Risk assessment in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia before early haemopoietic stem cell transplantation with a geno-identical donor: an easy clinical prognostic score to identify patients who benefit most from allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation.

In 1402 patients allografted in Europe during the period 1990-2000 with an HLA-identical sibling in first remission (CR1), the median interval from CR1 to allotransplant (96 days) was a major prognostic factor, patients transplanted earlier having a worse outcome. We studied in depth the 414 fully evaluable patients transplanted less than 96 days after achieving CR1; in these patients, only three factors predicted for the outcome by multivariate analysis: patient age, CR1 achievement with one or more induction courses and the recipient/donor sex combination. These three factors overcame the information from cytogenetics and source of stem cells. Three prognostic groups could be identified in relation to the outcome, using a prognostic score affecting 1 to each poor risk factor (total from 0 to 3): Group 1 (good prognosis) includes patients <35 years old, achieving CR1 with one induction course and to be transplanted with any other sex combination than female to male (score 0); group 2 (intermediate) with one adverse factor (score 1); and group 3 (bad prognosis) with two or three adverse criteria (scores 2 and 3). In these three groups, the 3-year leukaemia-free survival was 56+/-5%, 48+/-4% and 29+/-4% and the overall survival was 65+/-5, 53+/-4 and 29+/-5%, respectively. Therefore, adult patients with ALL and a score of 0 or 1 are good candidates for an early transplant if they have an identical sibling donor. Patient age, response to induction and the sex of the HLA-identical family donor (if existing) are the strongest easy predictors of the outcome for an early transplant in an adult patient with ALL. No additional information is mandatory.

[Difference in costs of autologous transplantation of peripheral and bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells. A retrospective analysis over 1 year of transplantation in lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and myeloma in a Center]. / Différence de coût des autogreffes de cellules-souches hématopoïétiques circulantes et médullaires.

The study analysed the financial benefits of transplantation with peripheral blood stem-cells primed after chemotherapy and growth factor in comparison with bone marrow transplantation. Twenty-three consecutive transplantations were performed during one year: 14 peripheral blood stem-cell (CSC group) and 9 bone marrow transplantations (MO group). No differences in patients characteristics were seen between the two groups except for higher number of "BEAM" conditioning in CSC group. Were analyzed delay in neutrophil and platelet recovery, numbers of days in hospital, with fever, under antibiotics, costs of supportive therapy, stem-cell collection and cryopreservation. Difference was significant for duration of neutropenia with advantages in CSC group, but the number on days in hospital, with fever or under antibiotics were similar. Number of platelet transfusions was reduced in CFC group: this economical advantage was lost with the cost of growth factor used for priming stem-cells stem-cell collections and cryopreservations. In our retrospective study, financial advantages associated to peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation was not verified.