RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 4% to 8% of patients with HIV-1 treated with abacavir present a hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). Various studies have shown a direct association between human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*5701 and HSR to abacavir. The objective of this study was to analyze whether systematic HLA-B*5701 testing to prevent HSR in patients treated with abacavir is a cost-effective option for the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: An analytical decision-making model was constructed as a decision tree model for a simulated cohort of 1000 HIV patients to evaluate whether HLA-B*5701 testing to prevent HSR to abacavir was cost effective compared with not performing the test. The parameters included in the model and the use of healthcare resources should the patient develop HSR were taken from the PREDICT-1 study and the opinion of clinical experts. The principal result obtained was the incremental cost per HSR avoided. The time horizon of the analysis was to 2 months [corrected] . All costs were expressed in 2008 Euros. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the total direct healthcare costs per patient were 1344 and 1322 with and without HLA-B*5701 testing respectively, and that 36 cases of HSR were prevented per 1000 screened patients. These results yielded a cost per HSR avoided of 630. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were sensitive to the cost of the test, with an economic saving of 102 or a cost-effectiveness ratio of 4234. CONCLUSIONS: The model predicts that generalized use of the HLA-B*5701 test before prescribing abacavir in HIV+ patients could represent an economic saving or a limited additional cost for the National Health System which may be counterbalanced by the benefits in terms of a lower incidence of HSR.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Didesoxinucleosídeos/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/economia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Soropositividade para HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Antígenos HLA-B , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Antígenos HLA-B/imunologia , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antiretroviral treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients seems to increase the coronary risk (CR) in these patients. Adequate assessment of CR has significant implications for the management of these patients. Our objective was to compare 2 systems for assessing 10-year CR in HIV-infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: CR was calculated in a prospective cohort of 205 HIV-infected patients using Framingham tables and REGICOR adapted tables. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in these patients was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age (standard deviation) was 41.4 (8.2) years. Most patients were taking antiretrovirals and had a good immunological status. Current smoking was reported by 77.1% of patients, while a history of dyslipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes was found in 29.3%, 7.3%, and 4.9% of patients, respectively. Lipodystrophy was seen in 41% of patients, abdominal obesity in 21.5%, and a sedentary lifestyle in 50.7% Mean values obtained were 6.55 (6.36) in the Framingham scale and 2.85 (2.31) in the REGICOR scale. A 10-year CR greater than 10% was found in 26 patients (12.9%) with the Framingham tables and in 4 patients (2.0%) with the REGICOR tables. The difference between both methods was significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Application of the Framingham tables to our cohort may overestimate the CR. Studies aimed at identifying the most adequate method for measuring CR in HIV-infected patients are required. Until such data are available, estimation of CR in these patients should be taken with caution.
