A guide to interpreting economic studies in infectious diseases.

Healthcare providers continue to seek improved methods for preventing, detecting and treating diseases that affect human survival and quality of life. At the same time, there will always be financial constraints because of limited societal resources. Many of the discussions on how to provide economically sound solutions to this challenge have not fully engaged the input of clinicians in the field. The purpose of this review is to increase economic knowledge for clinicians. We cover healthcare cost elements and methods used to assign value to a health outcome. We outline the challenges in conducting economic studies in the field of infectious diseases. Finally, we discuss the meaning of efficiency from multiple perspectives, and how the concept of economic externalities applies to infectious diseases.

Distribution of variable vs fixed costs of hospital care.

CONTEXT: Most strategies proposed to control the rising cost of health care are aimed at reducing medical resource consumption rates. These approaches may be limited in effectiveness because of the relatively low variable cost of medical care. Variable costs (for medication and supplies) are saved if a facility does not provide a service while fixed costs (for salaried labor, buildings, and equipment) are not saved over the short term when a health care facility reduces service. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative variable and fixed costs of inpatient and outpatient care for a large urban public teaching hospital. DESIGN: Cost analysis. SETTING: A large urban public teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All expenditures for the institution during 1993 and for each service were categorized as either variable or fixed. Fixed costs included capital expenditures, employee salaries and benefits, building maintenance, and utilities. Variable costs included health care worker supplies, patient care supplies, diagnostic and therapeutic supplies, and medications. RESULTS: In 1993, the hospital had nearly 114000 emergency department visits, 40000 hospital admissions, 240000 inpatient days, and more than 500000 outpatient clinic visits. The total budget for 1993 was $429.2 million, of which $360.3 million (84%) was fixed and $68.8 million (16%) was variable. Overall, 31.5% of total costs were for support expenses such as utilities, employee benefits, and housekeeping salaries, and 52.4% included direct costs of salary for service center personnel who provide services to individual patients. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cost in providing hospital service is related to buildings, equipment, salaried labor, and overhead, which are fixed over the short term. The high fixed costs emphasize the importance of adjusting fixed costs to patient consumption to maintain efficiency.

Emergency Department Observation Unit versus hospital inpatient care for a chronic asthmatic population: a randomized trial of health status outcome and cost.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine if an accelerated treatment protocol administered to acute asthmatics presenting to a Hospital Emergency Department Observation Unit (EDOU) can offset the need for inpatient admissions and reduce total cost per episode of care without sacrificing patient quality of life. METHODS: The authors used a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing postintervention patient quality of life for EDOU care versus standard inpatient care as measured by the standardized Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) SF-36 instrument. Other measures reported include: clinical status as measured by peak flow rates, total cost per treatment arm using microcosting techniques, and relapse-free survival 8 weeks after treatment. Eligible patients (n = 113) were assigned randomly to an EDOU or inpatient care from a consecutive sample of 250 acute asthmatic patients presenting to an urban hospital emergency department who could not resolve their acute asthma exacerbation after 3 hours of emergency department therapy. RESULTS: Patients assigned to the EDOU had lower mean costs of treatment (EDOU = $1,202 versus Hospital Inpatient = $2,247) and higher quality of life outcomes after intervention in five of eight domains measured by the MOS SF-36: Physical Functioning, Role Functioning-Emotional, Social Functioning, Mental Health, and Vitality. No differences were found in clinical outcomes as measured by peak flow rates or postintervention relapse-free survival. Univariate comparative findings were re-examined and confirmed through multivariable analysis when baseline SF-36 scores and postintervention peak expiratory flow rates clinical status were used as covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the EDOU was a lower cost and more effective treatment alternative for a refractory asthmatic population presenting to the Emergency Department. Several baseline MOS SF-36 domains proved useful in predicting or validating posttreatment clinical status, relapse, and total costs of care. Outcome SF-36 domain scores were also useful in identifying patients with the most favorable clinical, cost, and relapse rate outcomes at the study endpoint.

Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: More than 3 million patients are hospitalized yearly in the United States for chest pain. The cost is over $3 billion just for those found to be free of acute disease. New rapid diagnostic tests for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have resulted in the proliferation of accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) and chest pain observation units. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of an emergency department (ED)-based ADP can reduce hospital admission rate, total cost, and length of stay (LOS) for patients needing admission for evaluation of chest pain. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing admission rate, total cost, and LOS for patients treated using ADP vs inpatient controls. Total costs were determined using empirically measured resource utilization and microcosting techniques. SETTING: A large urban public teaching hospital serving a predominantly African American and Hispanic population. PATIENTS: A sample of 165 patients was randomly selected from a larger consecutive sample of 429 patients with chest pain concurrently enrolled in an ADP diagnostic cohort trial. Eligible patients presented to the ED with clinical findings suggestive of AMI or acute cardiac ischemia (ACI) but at low risk using a validated predictive algorithm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes measured for each subject were LOS and total cost of treatment. RESULTS: The hospital admission rate for ADP vs control patients was 45.2% vs 100% (P<.001). The mean total cost per patient for ADP vs control patients was $1528 vs $2095 (P<.001). The mean LOS measured in hours for ADP vs control patients was 33.1 hours vs 44.8 hours (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, ADP saved $567 in total hospital costs per patient treated. Use of ED-based ADPs can reduce hospitalization rates, LOS, and total cost for low-risk patients with chest pain needing evaluation for possible AMI or ACI.

A comparison between emergency diagnostic and treatment unit and inpatient care in the management of acute asthma.

BACKGROUND: Emergency diagnostic and treatment units (EDTUs) may provide an alternative to hospitalization for patients with reversible diseases, such as asthma, who fail to adequately respond to emergency department therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the medical and cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and quality of life of patients receiving EDTU care for acute asthma compared with inpatient care. METHODS: A prospective, randomized clinical trial performed at 2 urban public hospitals enrolled patients with acute asthma (age range, 18-55 years) not meeting discharge criteria after 3 hours of emergency department therapy. Patients were treated with inhaled adrenergic agonists and steroids in an EDTU for up to 9 hours after randomization or with routine therapy in a hospital ward. Patients were followed up for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discharge rate from the EDTU, length of stay, relapse rates, days missed from work or school, days incapacitated during waking hours, symptom-free days and nights, nocturnal awakenings, direct medical costs, patients satisfaction, and patient quality of life. RESULTS: The study consisted of 222 patients with asthma. Sixty-five patients (59%) treated in an EDTU were discharged home; the remainder were admitted to the hospital. There were no differences during the follow-up period in relapse rates (P = .74) or in any other morbidities between the EDTU and inpatient groups. There were significant differences in the length of stay, patient satisfaction, and quality of life favoring EDTU care. The mean (+/-SD) cost per patient in the EDTU group was $1202.79 +/- $1343.96, compared with $2247.32 +/- $1110.18 for the control group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of selected patients with asthma in an EDTU results in the safe discharge of most such patients. This study suggests that quality gains and cost-effective measures can be achieved by the use of such units.

Feasibility of a rapid diagnostic protocol for an emergency department chest pain unit.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the applicability of a short-stay protocol for exclusion of acute ischemic heart disease without hospital admission and to analyze these results in the context of a conceptual model. METHODS: An observational study of patients who presented with chest pain to the emergency department of an 886-bed inner-city municipal hospital and who needed hospital admission to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients were assessed by ED attending physicians to determine eligibility for an alternative, 12-hour protocol in an ED chest pain observation unit (CPOU) followed by immediate exercise testing. Outcome measures were proportion of patients eligible for the short-stay protocol, risk factor profile, and reasons for exclusion. RESULTS: Of 500 patients screened, 446 had sufficient data points to determine protocol eligibility. Of these, 238 (53.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7% to 57.9%) were found to have low probability for AMI. After study exclusion criteria were applied to the patient cohort, 63 patients (14.1%; 95% CI, 10.9% to 17.3%) were eligible for the protocol. The most common reasons for exclusion were history of coronary artery disease (46%) and inability to perform an interpretable exercise tolerance test (42%). CONCLUSION: Although most admitted patients with chest pain (53%) were at low probability for AMI, only a minority (14%) were eligible for a short-stay protocol that required patients to be free of known coronary artery disease and able to perform an exercise tolerance test. Factors affecting the operations and efficiency of a CPOU include clinical characteristics of the target patient population, protocol tests used, and hospital occupancy and reimbursement patterns.

Patient satisfaction with an emergency department chest pain observation unit.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction is an essential outcome measure in the diagnosis and treatment of acute chest pain in the emergency department. We compared patient satisfaction with the diagnostic protocol of a chest pain observation unit (CPOU) and standard inpatient hospitalization. METHODS: We prospectively studied patients who presented to the ED with chest pain and were found to have a low risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but who still might have benefited from a diagnostic protocol to rule out AMI. Consenting patients (N = 104) were randomized to the CPOU (experimental) arm or the hospital inpatient (control) arm and assessed for satisfaction by means of an interview before hospital discharge. RESULTS: The CPOU protocol scored higher on four summary ratings of overall patient satisfaction. Correlations between overall satisfaction, number, and type of problems with care, and patient characteristics demonstrated content validity and revealed strengths and improvements that might be made in CPOUs. CONCLUSION: Patients were more satisfied with rapid diagnosis in the CPOU than with inpatient stays for acute chest pain. Our findings add important information to the standard practice of weighing clinical and cost outcomes between two medical care alternatives.