Return on investment of the diabetes foot care clinical pathway implementation in Alberta, Canada.

AIMS: Based on best practices, the diabetes foot care clinical pathway (DFCCP) has been developed and implemented in several clinics in Alberta, Canada. We performed a return on investment (ROI) analysis of this implementation. METHODS: We used a cohort design comparing both cost and return (in terms of reduced health services utilization, HSU) between diabetes patients who were exposed and who were unexposed, to the intervention. We used a difference-in-difference approach and a propensity-score-matching technique to minimize biases due to differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between two cohorts. We used a 1-year time-horizon and converted all costs/savings to 2019 Canadian dollars (1 CA$ ~= 0.75 US$). RESULTS: The intervention helped avoid $3500 in costs of HSU per patient-year. Subtracting the intervention cost of $500, the net benefit of intervention was $3000 (ranged $2400-$3700) per patient-year. The ROI ratio was estimated at 7.4 (ranged 6.1 to 8.8) meaning that every invested $1 returned $7.4 (ranged $6.1-$8.8) for the health system. The probability of intervention being cost-saving ranged from 99.5-100%. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of DFCCP in Alberta is cost-saving. A continuation of the pathway implementation at studied clinics and a spread to other clinics are recommended.

Digging deeper: quality of patient-provider communication across Hispanic subgroups.

BACKGROUND: Recent research suggests that ethnic subgroup designation plays an important role in health-related disparities among Hispanics. Our objective was to examine the influence of Hispanics' self-reported ethnic subgroup designation on perceptions of their health care providers' communication behaviors. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2005 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Participants included non-institutionalized Hispanics (n = 5197; US population estimate = 27,070,906), aged > or = 18 years, reporting visiting a health care provider within the past 12 months. Six (n = 6) items were used to capture respondents' perceptions of their health care providers' communication behaviors. RESULTS: After controlling for socio-demographic covariates, compared to Other Hispanics (reference group), very few differences in perceptions of health care providers communication emerged across ethnic subgroups. Puerto Ricans were more likely to report that their health care provider "always" showed respect for what they had to say (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.16-4.03). Both Puerto Ricans (OR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.06-4.92) and Mexicans (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.02-3.46) were more likely to indicate that their health care provider "always" spent enough time with them as compared to Other Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: We observed very few differences among Hispanics respondents in their perceived quality of interactions with health care providers as a function of their ethnic subgroup designation. While our findings somewhat contradict previous research, they do suggest that other underlying factors may influence the quality of perceived interactions with health care providers.

The medical dialogue: disentangling differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites.

BACKGROUND: Patients' race and ethnicity play an important role in quality of and access to healthcare in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of ethnicity--Hispanic whites vs. non-Hispanic whites--on respondents' self-reported interactions with healthcare providers. To understand, among Hispanic whites, how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics impact their interactions with healthcare providers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2002 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative survey on medical care conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. PARTICIPANTS: Civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged > or = 18 years who reported visiting a healthcare provider within the past 12 months prior to data collection. RESULTS: After controlling for several demographic and socioeconomic covariates, compared to non-Hispanic whites (reference group), Hispanic whites who had visited a doctor's office or clinic in the past 12 months were more likely to report that their healthcare provider "always" listened to them [odds ratio (OR) = 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.53], explained things so that they understood (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.41), showed respect for what they had to say (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.35-1.72), and spent enough time with them (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.38). However, Hispanics were less likely to indicate that their health care provider "always" gave them control over treatment options (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95) as compared to non-Hispanics. Within the Hispanic population exclusively, age, place of residence, census region, health insurance status, and presence of a usual source of care influenced self-reported interactions with healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: Hispanic white respondents were more likely to report that some aspects of provider-patient interactions were indicative of high quality, whereas those related to decision-making autonomy were not. These somewhat paradoxical results should be examined more fully in future research.

Can screening items identify surgery patients at risk of limited health literacy?

BACKGROUND: Health literacy skills (HLS) have been shown to have a major impact on patient outcomes. To identify patients with limited or marginal HLS, the accuracy of three established screening items were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied English-speaking adults (>or=21 years) attending a university-based vascular surgery clinic. Structured interviews were conducted to assess sociodemographic characteristics, screening items, and HLS. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves were plotted to assess the discriminatory capacity of each screening item in detecting patients with limited/marginal HLS. RESULTS: One hundred patients agreed to enter the study and met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62.0 +/- 12.9; 65 were female; 96 were Caucasian; and 32 had not completed high school. The three screening items were effective in detecting patients with limited (n=18) or marginal (n=21) HLS. "How often do you have someone (like a family member, friend, or hospital worker) help you read hospital materials?" (AUROC of 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.73, 0.92), "How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information?" (AUROC of 0.77; 95% CI=0.67, 0.86), and "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" (AUROC of 0.76; 95% CI=0.66, 0.86) were effective in detecting those with limited/marginal HLS skills. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide further evidence of the clinical usefulness of these screening items for detecting inadequate HLS in this patient population. Surgeons should consider administering these easy screening items to identify patients at greatest risk of limited or marginal HLS.

Literacy, medical care, and health status in Tennessee.

Based on the most recent information, Tennessee is facing an enormous problem with literacy and health outcomes. As a result, the healthcare industry is vulnerable because of patients' inability to understand and follow a plan of treatment. This in part has resulted in poor healthcare and increased costs in providing care. By implementing strategies such as those outlined in Table 1, strides can be made in improving the healthcare provided to Tennesseans and reducing costs associated.