Rectal Prolapse Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and optimal management of rectal prolapse following repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM) has not been well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium registry. All children with a history of ARM repair were included. Our primary outcome was rectal prolapse. Secondary outcomes included operative management of prolapse and anoplasty stricture following operative management of prolapse. Univariate analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with our primary and secondary outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess the association between laparoscopic ARM repair and rectal prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients met inclusion criteria; 163 (14.3%) developed rectal prolapse. On univariate analysis, prolapse was significantly associated with male sex, sacral abnormalities, ARM type, ARM complexity, and laparoscopic ARM repairs (p < 0.001). ARM types with the highest rates of prolapse included rectourethral-prostatic fistula (29.2%), rectovesical/bladder neck fistula (28.8%), and cloaca (25.0%). Of those who developed prolapse, 110 (67.5%) underwent operative management. Anoplasty strictures developed in 27 (24.5%) patients after prolapse repair. After controlling for ARM type and hospital, laparoscopic ARM repair was not significantly associated with prolapse (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 1.50 (0.84, 2.66), p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Rectal prolapse develops in a significant subset of patients following ARM repair. Risk factors for prolapse include male sex, complex ARM type, and sacral abnormalities. Further research investigating the indications for operative management of prolapse and operative techniques for prolapse repair are needed to define optimal treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Healthcare Burden and Cost in Children with Anorectal Malformation During the First 5 Years of Life.

OBJECTIVE: To identify cumulative 5-year healthcare costs and healthcare days in children with anorectal malformation (ARM) and to compare the cumulative 5-year healthcare costs and healthcare days in children with ARM with 3 control cohorts: healthy, premature, and congenital heart disease (CHD). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective case-control study using the Truven MarketScan database of commercial claims encounters between 2008 and 2017. The ARM, CHD, and premature cohorts were identified using a targeted list of International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Revision diagnosis and Current Procedural Terminology codes. The healthy cohort included patients without ARM, preterm birth, or CHD. RESULTS: We identified 664 children with ARM, 3356 children with heart disease, 63 190 children who were born preterm, and 2947 healthy patients. At 5 years, the total healthcare costs of children with ARM ($273K, 95% CI $168K-$378K) were similar to the premature cohort ($246K, 95% CI $237K-$255K) and lower than the CHD cohort ($466K, 95% CI $401K-$530K, P < .001). Total healthcare days were similar in children with ARM (158 days, 95% CI 117-198) and prematurity (141 days, 95% CI 137-144) but lower than CHD (223 days, 95% CI 197-250, P = .02). In ARM, outpatient care (126 days, 95% CI 93-159) represented the largest contribution to total healthcare days. CONCLUSIONS: Children with ARM accumulate similar healthcare costs to children with prematurity and comparable healthcare days to children with CHD and prematurity in the first 5 years of life. Outpatient care represents the majority of healthcare days in children with ARM, identifying this as a target for quality improvement and demonstrating the long-term impact of this condition.

A genealogical assessment of familial clustering of anorectal malformations.

Familial recurrence of anorectal malformations (ARMs) has been reported in single institution case series and in two population-based studies. Here, we investigate the familial aggregation of ARMs using well-established, unbiased methods in a population genealogy of Utah. Study subjects included 255 ARM cases identified from among the two largest healthcare providers in Utah with linked genealogy data using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes. The genealogical index of familiality (GIF) statistic, which compares the average pair-wise relatedness of cases to sets of matched controls, was used to test excess familial clustering. We also estimated relative risks (RRs) for ARM and associated phenotypes in relatives of cases adjusting for age-, sex-, and birthplace. Significant excess familial clustering was observed for all ARM subjects (GIF p < 1e-3). Significant RR estimates for ARM (RR = 15.6, p = 3.3e-6), and for almost all co-morbid birth defects previously associated with ARM, were observed among first-degree relatives of ARM case subjects. This genealogically-based population survey of familial aggregation of ARMs confirms the presence of a heritable component to ARMs and provides unbiased risk estimates to relatives of cases, which may have clinical utility.

A structured bowel management program for patients with severe functional constipation can help decrease emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and healthcare costs.

BACKGROUND: Published health-care costs related to constipation in children in the USA are estimated at $3.9 billion/year. We sought to assess the effect of a bowel management program (BMP) on health-care utilization and costs. METHODS: At two collaborating centers, BMP involves an outpatient week during which a treatment plan is implemented and objective assessment of stool burden is performed with daily radiography. We reviewed all patients with severe functional constipation who participated in the program from March 2011 to June 2015 in center 1 and from April 2014 to April 2016 in center 2. ED visits, hospital admissions, and constipation-related morbidities (abdominal pain, fecal impaction, urinary retention, urinary tract infections) 12 months before and 12 months after completion of the BMP were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four patients were included (center 1 = 96, center 2 = 88). Sixty-three (34.2%) patients had at least one unplanned visit to the ED before treatment. ED visits decreased to 23 (12.5%) or by 64% (p < 0.0005). Unplanned hospital admissions decreased from 65 to 28, i.e., a 56.9% reduction (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: In children with severe functional constipation, a structured BMP decreases unplanned visits to the ED, hospital admissions, and costs for constipation-related health care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Paravertebral regional blocks decrease length of stay following surgery for pectus excavatum in children.

PURPOSE: Management of postoperative pain following repair of pectus excavatum has traditionally included thoracic epidural analgesia, narcotics, and benzodiazepines. We hypothesized that the use of intercostal or paravertebral regional blocks could result in decreased inpatient length of stay (LOS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 137 patients (118 Nuss and 19 Ravitch - Nuss and Ravitch patients were analyzed separately) who underwent surgical repair of pectus excavatum with pain management via epidural, intercostal, or paravertebral analgesia from January 2009-December 2012. Measured outcomes included LOS, pain scores, benzodiazepine/narcotic requirements, emesis, professional fees, hospital cost, and total cost. RESULTS: In the Nuss patients, LOS was significantly reduced in the paravertebral group (p<0.005) and the intercostal group (p<0.005) compared to the epidural group, but was paradoxically countered by a nonsignificant increase in total cost (p=0.09). While benzodiazepine doses/day was not increased in the paravertebral group (p=0.08), an increase was seen in narcotic use (p<0.005). Despite increased narcotic use, no differences were seen in emesis between epidural and paravertebral use. Compared to epidural, pain scores were higher for both intercostal and paravertebral on day one (p<0.005), but equivalent for paravertebral on day three (p=0.62). The Ravitch group was too small for detailed independent statistical analysis but followed the same overall trend seen in the Nuss patients. CONCLUSION: Our use of paravertebral continuous infusion pain catheters for pectus excavatum repair was an effective alternative to epidural analgesia resulting in shorter LOS but not a decrease in overall cost.

Charge Awareness Affects Treatment Choice: Prospective Randomized Trial in Pediatric Appendectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether charge awareness affects patient decisions. BACKGROUND: Pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis can be treated with open or laparoscopic techniques. These 2 operations are considered to have clinical equipoise. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, nonobese children admitted to a children's hospital with uncomplicated appendicitis were randomized to view 1 of 2 videos discussing open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Videos were identical except that only one presented the difference in surgical materials charges. Patients and parents then choose which operation they desired. Videos were available in English and Spanish. A postoperative survey was conducted to examine factors that influenced choice. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 01738750). RESULTS: Of 275 consecutive cases, 100 met enrollment criteria. In the group exposed to charge data (n = 49), 63% chose open technique versus 35% not presented charge data (P = 0.005). Patients were 1.8 times more likely to choose the less expensive option when charge estimate was given (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.75). The median total hospital charges were $1554 less for those who had open technique (P < 0.001) and $528 less for the group exposed to charge information (P = 0.033). Survey found that 90% of families valued having input in this decision and 31% of patients exposed to charge listed it as their primary reason for their choice in technique. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and parents tended to choose the less expensive but equally effective technique when given the opportunity. A discussion of treatment options, which includes charge information, may represent an unrealized opportunity to affect change in health care spending.

Implementing an ultrasound-based protocol for diagnosing appendicitis while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound to diagnose appendicitis in children is well-documented but not universally employed outside of pediatric academic centers, especially in the United States. Various obstacles make it difficult for institutions and radiologists to abandon a successful and accurate CT-based imaging protocol in favor of a US-based protocol. OBJECTIVE: To describe how we overcame barriers to implementing a US-based appendicitis protocol among a large group of nonacademic private-practice pediatric radiologists while maintaining diagnostic accuracy and decreasing medical costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of physicians (pediatric surgery, pediatric emergency medicine and pediatric radiology) approved an imaging protocol using US as the primary modality to evaluate suspected appendicitis with CT for equivocal cases. The protocol addressed potential bias against US and accommodated for institutional limitations of radiologist and sonographer experience and availability. Radiologists coded US reports according to the probability of appendicitis. Radiology reports were compared with clinical outcomes to assess diagnostic accuracy. During the study period, physicians from each group were apprised of the interim US protocol accuracy results. Problematic cases were discussed openly. RESULTS: A total of 512 children were enrolled and underwent US for evaluation of appendicitis over a 30-month period. Diagnostic accuracy was comparable to published results for combined US/CT protocols. Comparing the first 12 months to the last 12 months of the study period, the proportion of children achieving an unequivocal US result increased from 30% (51/169) to 53% (149/282) and the proportion of children undergoing surgery based solely on US findings increased from 55% (23/42) to 84% (92/109). Overall, 63% (325/512) of patients in the protocol did not require a CT. Total patient costs were reduced by $30,182 annually. CONCLUSION: We overcame several barriers to implementing a US protocol. During the study period our ability to visualize the appendix with US increased and utilization of CT decreased. Our overall diagnostic accuracy with the US-based protocol was comparable to other published results and remained unchanged throughout the study.

Neurologically intact children with an isolated skull fracture may be safely discharged after brief observation.

PURPOSE: The management of children presenting with an isolated skull fracture (ISF) posttrauma is highly variable. We sought to estimate the risk of neurologic deterioration in children with a Glasgow coma score (GCS) 15 and ISF to reduce unnecessary hospital admissions. METHODS: A retrospective review at a level I pediatric trauma referral center was conducted for patients with ISF on head computed tomography from 2003 to 2008. Patients were excluded for injury greater than 24 hours prior, GCS less than 15, intracranial pathology, significant fracture depression, or complex fractures involving facial bones or skull base. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were identified with an ISF. The median age was 11 months, with falls accounting for 87% of the injuries. One hundred seventy-seven patients were admitted, and 58 patients were discharged from the emergency department after a period of observation (median, 3.3 hours). Median length of stay for those admitted to the hospital was 18.2 hours. One patient developed vomiting following overnight observation and a repeat computed tomography scan demonstrated a small extra-axial hematoma that required no intervention. The mean total costs for patients discharged from the emergency department were $291 vs $1447 for those admitted for observation (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with a presenting GCS of 15 and an ISF can be safely discharged from the emergency department after a short period of observation if they are asymptomatic and have a reliable social environment. This could result in significant savings by eliminating inpatient costs.