Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Psychiatriki ; 30(3): 216-225, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31685453

RESUMO

School bullying is increasingly recognized as an important factor affecting both individual's wellbeing and social functioning. Several studies provide evidence for the potential role of contextual factors that relate to bullying victimization such as the socioeconomic status of the parents/ family, the quality of family and home environment, the school climate, structure and ethos, and also various community characteristics. The objectives of this school-based, cross-sectional study were to report the prevalence of the perception of being bullied in a sample of Greek children and adolescents from 6 to 17 years of age and to investigate the relations among the subjective impression of bullying victimization and several sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors. We hypothesized that influences external to individual children and adolescents play a decisive role to their perception of being victimized. Bullying victimization was measured through a simple "yes/no" question, which confirmed or rejected respectively the fact that the child or adolescent has been at some time victimized in the school environment. Also, demographic and socioeconomic data about the families of children and adolescents were collected. A total of 1,588 children (51.8% females, mean age ± SD: 12.9±2.8 years) were assessed. The overall prevalence of victimization was 10.4%. Multiple logistic regression analysis on the probability of being victimized identified that living at a main urban center (Odds Ratio[OR]: 2.63, CI: 1.78-3.87, p<0.001), presence of a person with a chronic illness at home (OR: 1.90, CI: 1.12-3.20, p=0.016), poor family economic status (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.05-3.20, p=0.032),and increased number of adults at home (OR: 2.00, CI: 1.00-3.77, p=0,041) had a positive correlation with the prevalence of reported bullying victimization. Moreover, higher parental educational level related to lower probability of victimization (OR: 0.88, CI: 0.78-0.99, p=0.05). These findings demonstrate that several demographic and socioeconomic factors play a potential role in bullying victimization among schoolchildren. Our results also highlight the need to consider the influence of contextual factors in the design of targeting efforts countering and/or preventing bullying victimization.


Assuntos
Bullying/psicologia , Vítimas de Crime/psicologia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Escolaridade , Família , Feminino , Grécia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pais , Prevalência , Instituições Acadêmicas , Fatores Sexuais , Classe Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos
2.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 31(5): 419-426, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30209931

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP) have proven to be effective tools for reducing the use of antimicrobials. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of an ASP implantation in a medical Ward. METHODS: Prospective intervention study in a medical ward with a heterogeneous composition. In September 2014, an ASP based on prospective audits was implemented. Antimicrobial consumption and the length of stay and mortality in all patients admitted, as well as in the main infections present in the unit, were compared before and after two years of the ASP implementation. RESULTS: A total of 378 infectious episodes of 335 pa-tients were evaluated in 168 meetings. The prescriber ac-cepted 92.3% of the suggestions. The consumption of an-timicrobials reviewed was reduced from 31.3 to 17.6 DDD / 100-stays (ß =-0.40, P = 0.015). The average cost per income was reduced from € 161.4 to € 123.3 (-23.6%). No differences were found in total length of stay or mortality. There were no changes in the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection or candidemia between the two periods. There were no significant differences in length of stay or mortality in total bacteremia, candidemia, and urinary tract infections caused by multiresistant bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an ASP in a heterogeneous medical ward significantly reduces the use of antimicrobials in a short time horizon without adversely affecting the evolution of the patients..


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos/organização & administração , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/economia , Clostridioides difficile , Redução de Custos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Feminino , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Departamentos Hospitalares/economia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 7: 527-35, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26508881

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of three echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin) and generic fluconazole in the treatment of nonneutropenic adult patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in intensive care units in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision-tree model was applied. The success and safety (hepatic and renal adverse effects) of first-line treatments were obtained from meta-analyses and systematic reviews of clinical trials. In the case of failure, a second-line treatment (liposomal amphotericin B after the echinocandins, or one of the echinocandins after fluconazole) was administered. The duration of the treatments (14 days total) was established by a panel of clinical experts using the Delphi method and according to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. The cost of the medications and renal toxicity were considered. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations were carried out. RESULTS: The total cost of the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis with anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, and fluconazole was €5,483, €5,968, €6,231, and €2,088, respectively. Anidulafungin was the dominant treatment (more effective, less expensive) compared to micafungin and caspofungin. The cost of achieving one more patient successfully treated with anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin compared to fluconazole was €17,199, €23,962, and €27,339, respectively. The result remained stable, despite modification of the duration of the first-line and second-line treatments, as well as most of the dosing regimens. The probabilistic analysis also remained stable. CONCLUSION: In accordance with this economic study, anidulafungin would produce savings and would be the dominant treatment compared with micafungin and caspofungin in nonneutropenic adult patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in intensive care units in Spain.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA