Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 81(12): 1181-1188, 2023 03 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36948735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that diverse care teams optimize patient outcomes. Describing the current representation of women and minorities has been a critical step in improving diversity across several fields. OBJECTIVES: To address the lack of data specific to pediatric cardiology, the authors conducted a national survey. METHODS: U.S. academic pediatric cardiology programs with fellowship training programs were surveyed. Division directors were invited (July 2021 to September 2021) to complete an e-survey of program composition. Underrepresented minorities in medicine (URMM) were characterized using standard definitions. Descriptive analyses at the hospital, faculty, and fellow level were performed. RESULTS: Altogether, 52 of 61 programs (85%) completed the survey, representing 1,570 total faculty and 438 fellows, with a wide range in program size (7-109 faculty, 1-32 fellows). Although women comprise approximately 60% of faculty in pediatrics overall, they made up 55% of fellows and 45% of faculty in pediatric cardiology. Representation of women in leadership roles was notably less, including 39% of clinical subspecialty directors, 25% of endowed chairs, and 16% of division directors. URMM comprise approximately 35% of the U.S. population; however, they made up only 14% of pediatric cardiology fellows and 10% of faculty, with very few in leadership roles. CONCLUSIONS: These national data suggest a "leaky pipeline" for women in pediatric cardiology and very limited presence of URRM overall. Our findings can inform efforts to elucidate underlying mechanisms for persistent disparity and reduce barriers to improving diversity in the field.


Assuntos
Cardiologia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Feminino , Criança , Estados Unidos , Docentes de Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Grupos Minoritários
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 79(12): 1170-1180, 2022 03 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331412

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent data have demonstrated that overall mortality and adverse events are not significantly different for primary repair (PR) and staged repair (SR) approaches to management of neonates with symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF). Cost data can be used to compare the relative value (cost for similar outcomes) of these approaches and are a potentially more sensitive measure of morbidity. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the economic costs associated with PR and SR in neonates with sTOF. METHODS: Data from a multicenter retrospective cohort study of neonates with sTOF were merged with administrative data to compare total costs and cost per day alive over the first 18 months of life in a propensity score-adjusted analysis. A secondary analysis evaluated differences in department-level costs. RESULTS: In total, 324 subjects from 6 centers from January 2011 to November 2017 were studied (40% PR). The 18-month cumulative mortality (P = 0.18), procedural complications (P = 0.10), hospital complications (P = 0.94), and reinterventions (P = 0.22) did not differ between PR and SR. Total 18-month costs for PR (median $179,494 [IQR: $121,760-$310,721]) were less than for SR (median: $222,799 [IQR: $167,581-$327,113]) (P < 0.001). Cost per day alive (P = 0.005) and department-level costs were also all lower for PR. In propensity score-adjusted analyses, PR was associated with lower total cost (cost ratio: 0.73; P < 0.001) and lower department-level costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study of neonates with sTOF, PR was associated with lower costs. Given similar overall mortality between treatment strategies, this finding suggests that PR provides superior value.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Tetralogia de Fallot , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tetralogia de Fallot/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 114(6): 2383-2390, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35337788

RESUMO

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently proposed a substantial cut to reimbursement for surgical services, punctuating a steady decline in reimbursement for clinical services provided by cardiothoracic surgeons during the last several decades. Meanwhile, the costs of practicing cardiothoracic surgery continue to increase. In an effort to defect against diminishing control over patient care and further negative changes affecting reimbursement, cardiothoracic surgeons must be able to convincingly demonstrate their value to patients and the health care system. However, the overall contribution of a cardiothoracic surgeon can be difficult to measure objectively and varies widely according to a host of factors, including practice setting, experience, subspecialization, and the local market. To address these challenges, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Practice Management has commissioned a Writing Task Force to raise awareness, to concentrate knowledge, and to organize information related to compensation as a comprehensive resource for cardiothoracic surgeons. The purpose of this initial report is to provide an overview of the major factors having an impact on compensation for cardiothoracic surgeons.


Assuntos
Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Cirurgiões , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Medicare , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Recursos Humanos
5.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 113(3): 866-873, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34116004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For the more than 40,000 children in the United States undergoing congenital heart surgery annually, the relationship between hospital quality and costs remains unclear. Prior studies report conflicting results and clinical outcomes have continued to improve over time. We examined a large contemporary cohort, aiming to better inform ongoing initiatives seeking to optimize health care value in this population. METHODS: Clinical information (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Database) was merged with standardized cost data (Pediatric Health Information Systems) for children undergoing heart surgery from 2010 to 2015. In-hospital cost variability was analyzed using Bayesian hierarchical models adjusted for case-mix. Quality metrics examined included in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay (PLOS), and a composite. RESULTS: Overall, 32 hospitals (n = 45,315 patients) were included. Median adjusted cost per case varied across hospitals from $67,700 to $51,200 in the high vs low cost tertile (ratio 1.32; 95% credible interval, 1.29 to 1.35), and all quality metrics also varied across hospitals. Across cost tertiles, there were no significant differences in the quality metrics examined, with the exception of PLOS. The PLOS findings were driven by high-risk The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery categories 4 and 5 cases (adjusted median length of stay 16.8 vs 14.9 days in high vs low cost tertile [ratio 1.13, 1.05 to 1.24]), and intensive care unit PLOS. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary congenital heart surgery costs vary across hospitals but were not associated with most quality metrics examined, highlighting that performance in one area does not necessarily convey to others. Cost variability was associated with PLOS, particularly related to intensive care unit PLOS and high-risk cases. Care processes influencing PLOS may provide targets for value-based initiatives in this population.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Cirurgia Torácica , Teorema de Bayes , Criança , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estados Unidos
6.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 110(3): 962-968, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimal methods to assess resource utilization in congenital heart surgery remain unclear. We compared traditional cost-to-charge ratio methods with newer standardized cost methods that aim to more directly assess resources consumed. METHODS: Clinical data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database were linked with resource use data from the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database (2010 to 2015). Standardized cost methods specific to the congenital heart surgery population were developed and compared with cost-to-charge ratio methods. Resource use in the overall population and variability across hospitals were described using hierarchical mixed effect models adjusting for case-mix. RESULTS: Overall, 43 hospitals (65,331 patients) were included. There were minimal population-level differences in the distribution of resource use as estimated by the two methods. At the hospital level, there was less apparent variability in resource use across centers with the standardized cost vs cost-to-charge ratio method, overall (coefficient of variation 20% vs 25%) and across complexity (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery [STAT]) categories. When hospitals were categorized into tertiles by resource use, 33% changed classification depending on which resource use method was used (26% by one tertile and 7% by two tertiles). CONCLUSIONS: In this first evaluation of standardized cost methodology in the congenital heart population, we found minimal differences vs traditional methods at the population level. At the hospital level, the magnitude of variation in resource use was less with standardized cost methods, and approximately one third of centers changed resource use categories depending on the methodology used. Because of these differences, care should be taken in future studies and in benchmarking and reporting efforts in selecting optimal methodology.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estados Unidos
8.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 32(1): 128-137, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31518703

RESUMO

The objective of this study is to simulate regionalization of congenital heart surgery (CHS) in the United States and assess the impact of such a system on travel distance and mortality. Patients ≤18 years of age who underwent CHS were identified in 2012 State Inpatient Databases. Operations were stratified by the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 (RACHS-1) method, with high risk defined as RACHS-1 levels 4-6. Regionalization was simulated by progressive closure of hospitals, beginning with the lowest volume hospital. Patients were moved to the next closest hospital. Analyses were conducted (1) maintaining original hospital mortality rates and (2) estimating mortality rates based on predicted surgical volumes after absorbing moved patients. One hundred fifty-three hospitals from 36 states performed 1 or more operation (19,064 operations). With regionalization wherein, all hospitals performed >310 operations, 37 hospitals remained, from 12.5% to 17.4% fewer deaths occurred (83-116/666), and median patient travel distance increased from 38.5 to 69.6 miles (P < 0.01). When only high-risk operations were regionalized, 3.9-5.9% fewer deaths occurred (26-39/666), and the overall mortality rate did not change significantly. Regionalization of CHS in the United States to higher volume centers may reduce mortality with minimal increase in patient travel distance. Much of the mortality reduction may be missed if solely high-risk patients are regionalized.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/organização & administração , Serviços Centralizados no Hospital/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Regionalização da Saúde/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Área Programática de Saúde , Bases de Dados Factuais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiopatias Congênitas/mortalidade , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Viagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
9.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 107(2): 574-581, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30248321

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several countries have regionalized congenital heart surgery (CHS). Before considering regionalization in the US, the current landscape must be understood. This investigation characterized the network of US hospitals providing CHS, including hospital locations and patient travel patterns. METHODS: Patients ≤18 years undergoing CHS were identified in 2012 State Inpatient Databases from 39 states. Cases were stratified by the RACHS-1 method (high-risk defined as RACHS-1 categoris 4 to 6). Hospital and patient locations were identified. Patients were mapped to hospitals where they underwent surgery. RESULTS: A total of 153 hospitals across 36 states performed ≥1 RACHS-1 case (19,064 operations). Of these, 101 hospitals (66%) were located within 25 miles of another hospital. Median annual RACHS-1 case volume was 90 (range, 1 to 797), with 55 hospitals performing ≤50 cases. A total of 111 hospitals (73%) performed ≥1 high-risk case. Of these, 39 (35%) performed ≤10 high-risk cases/year. Overall mortality rate was 3.5% (n = 666), with risk-adjusted mortality being lowest at hospitals in the highest-volume quartile (≥150 cases/year). About 25% of patients (n = 4,012) traveled >100 miles, with most traveling to hospitals within the highest-volume quartile; 53% of patients (n = 8,376) bypassed the nearest CHS hospital. Mortality was not associated with travel distance. CONCLUSIONS: We identified more US hospitals performing CHS than has been previously described. Many are small-volume and are in close proximity to one another. Patients are already traveling long distances to hospitals within the highest-volume quartile. These data help define the current landscape of CHS and associated considerations regarding regionalization.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 102(5): 1580-1587, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27457827

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Performance assessment in congenital heart surgery is challenging due to the wide heterogeneity of disease. We describe current case mix across centers, evaluate methodology inclusive of all cardiac operations versus the more homogeneous subset of Society of Thoracic Surgeons benchmark operations, and describe implications regarding performance assessment. METHODS: Centers (n = 119) participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (2010 through 2014) were included. Index operation type and frequency across centers were described. Center performance (risk-adjusted operative mortality) was evaluated and classified when including the benchmark versus all eligible operations. RESULTS: Overall, 207 types of operations were performed during the study period (112,140 total cases). Few operations were performed across all centers; only 25% were performed at least once by 75% or more of centers. There was 7.9-fold variation across centers in the proportion of total cases comprising high-complexity cases (STAT 5). In contrast, the benchmark operations made up 36% of cases, and all but 2 were performed by at least 90% of centers. When evaluating performance based on benchmark versus all operations, 15% of centers changed performance classification; 85% remained unchanged. Benchmark versus all operation methodology was associated with lower power, with 35% versus 78% of centers meeting sample size thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in congenital heart surgery case mix across centers. Metrics based on benchmark versus all operations are associated with strengths (less heterogeneity) and weaknesses (lower power), and lead to differing performance classification for some centers. These findings have implications for ongoing efforts to optimize performance assessment, including choice of target population and appropriate interpretation of reported metrics.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Benchmarking , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/classificação , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Tamanho da Amostra , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 100(3): 1071-6; discussion 1077, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26245503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accurate hospital outcome measures in congenital heart surgery are important to multiple initiatives. While methods have been developed to account for differences in procedural case-mix, characteristics patients bring into the operation that may also vary across hospitals and influence outcome have received less attention. We evaluated the impact of these characteristics in a large cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing congenital heart surgery at centers participating in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (2010 to 2013) with adequate data quality were included. Variation across hospitals in important patient characteristics was examined, and hospital operative mortality rates were compared with and without adjustment for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 86 centers (52,224 patients) were included. There was greater than twofold variation across hospitals for nearly all patient characteristics examined. For example, the proportion of a center's surgical population comprised of neonates ranged from 12.8% to 26.6% across hospitals; the proportion with a non-cardiac anomaly ranged from 0.7% to 5.0%. When hospital mortality rankings were evaluated based on "standard" (adjustment for differences in procedural case-mix alone) versus "full" models (adjustment for both differences in procedural case-mix and patient characteristics), 14.0% changed their ranking for mortality by 20 or greater positions, 34.9% of centers changed which mortality quartile they were classified in, and 14.0% changed their statistical classification (statistically higher, lower, or same-as-expected mortality). CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of patients undergoing congenital heart surgery vary across centers and impact hospital outcomes assessment. Methods to assess outcomes and relative performance should account for these characteristics.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino
12.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 100(4): 1416-21, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26184555

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing focus on optimizing health care quality and reducing costs. The care of children undergoing heart surgery requires significant investment of resources, and it remains unclear how costs of care relate to quality. We evaluated this relationship across a multicenter cohort. METHODS: Clinical data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database were merged with cost data from the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database for children undergoing heart surgery (2006 to 2010). Hospital-level costs were modeled using Bayesian hierarchical methods adjusting for case-mix, and hospitals were categorized into cost tertiles. The primary quality metric evaluated was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 27 hospitals (30,670 patients) were included. Median adjusted cost per case was $82,360 and varied fivefold across hospitals, while median adjusted mortality was 3.4% and ranged from 2.4% to 5.0% across hospitals. Overall, hospitals in the lowest cost tertile had significantly lower adjusted mortality rates compared with the middle and high cost tertiles (2.5% vs 3.8% and 3.5%, respectively, both p < 0.001). When assessed at the individual hospital level, most (75%) but not all hospitals in the lowest cost tertile were also in the lowest mortality tertile. Similar relationships were seen across the spectrum of surgical complexity. Lower cost hospitals also had shorter length of stay and trends toward fewer major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Lowest cost hospitals generally deliver the highest quality care for children undergoing heart surgery, although there is some variation in this relationship. This information is important in the design of initiatives aiming to optimize health care value in this population.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/normas , Custos Hospitalares , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido
13.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 97(2): 659-65, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24365213

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infants supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after a Norwood operation face in-hospital mortality rates of 60% to 70%. There are limited data on completion of staged palliation for the subset of patients who survive to hospital discharge. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study of 64 sequential patients at a single institution supported by ECMO after a Norwood operation. Primary endpoints were survival to hospital discharge, stage II palliation, and stage III palliation. Predictors of non-survival to each endpoint were identified with logistic regression. Survival was compared with a 3:1 era-matched group of control patients who underwent a Norwood operation but did not require ECMO. RESULTS: Survival to hospital discharge, stage II palliation, and stage III palliation was 43.8%, 35.9%, and 25.4%, respectively for ECMO cases. Factors independently associated with non-survival to hospital discharge included female gender, ECMO 7 days or greater, and need for renal replacement therapy on ECMO. Non-Caucasian race and ECMO 7 days or greater were independently associated with non-survival to stage II, while non-Caucasian race, lower birth weight, and ECMO 7 days or greater were independently associated with non-survival to stage III. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with decreased survival at each endpoint. Patients who survived ECMO had increased interstage mortality between hospital discharge and stage II palliation. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after a Norwood operation can be life-saving but ultimate survival through staged palliation remains suboptimal. The elevated mortality risk for patients supported by ECMO persists after hospital discharge. Both socioeconomic factors and ECMO-related morbidity may contribute to midterm mortality.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Procedimentos de Norwood , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA