Endosonography is superior to angiography in the preoperative assessment of vascular involvement among patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Surgical exploration in patients with pancreatic carcinoma without adequate preoperative attempts to determine resectability results in resection in only a minority of patients. Besides distant metastases, involvement of the major vessels is the most important parameter for determining resectability in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Angiography has been an integral part of pancreatic cancer staging. Lately, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a more accurate tool in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. We hypothesize that EUS is more accurate than selective venous angiography (SVA) for assessing resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma based on preoperative evaluation of vascular involvement. Twenty-one patients who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively evaluated with both EUS and SVA before undergoing surgical exploration for attempted curative resection. Vascular involvement was determined by EUS and SVA using previously described criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of EUS and SVA in assessing vascular involvement were compared, using surgical exploration as the gold standard. Endoscopic ultrasound had a higher sensitivity than SVA for detecting vascular involvement (86% vs. 21%, respectively; p = 0.0018). The specificity and accuracy of EUS for detecting vascular involvement was 71% and 81%, respectively. In contrast, the specificity and accuracy of SVA for detecting vascular involvement was 71% and 38%, respectively. Endoscopic ultrasound is significantly more sensitive than angiography for detecting vascu lar involvement in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and, thus, may improve patient selection for attempted curative resection.

The consequences of a major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Bile duct injury is perhaps the most feared complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The focus of this study was on the immediate and short-term outcome of patients who have undergone repair of major bile duct injuries with respect to hospital stay, perioperative interventions, and reoperations. The records of patients who underwent surgery at three academic hospitals in Philadelphia (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, and Graduate Hospital) from 1990 to 1995 for repair of a major biliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed. A major biliary injury was defined as any disruption (including ligation, avulsion, or resection) of the extrahepatic biliary system. Small biliary leaks not requiring surgery were excluded. Thirty-two patients sustained major bile duct injuries. The injury was recognized immediately in 10 patients. The remaining 22 patients had pain (59%), jaundice (50%), and/or fever (32%) as the symptom heralding the injury. Bismuth classification was as follows: 13% of patients were class I, 63% were class II, 7% were class III, 7% were class IV, and 10% were class V. Biliary reconstruction included a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in 30 patients and two were primary repairs. There was one postoperative death from multiorgan system failure. The mean length of hospital stay after repair was 17 +/- 8 days. Over a mean follow-up period of 11.5 +/- 10.5 months, 11 patients (38%) required 19 emergency readmissions, most commonly for cholangitis. Five patients (17%) required postoperative balloon dilatation for biliary stricture. At follow-up 18 patients (62.0%) remain asymptomatic with normal liver function, eight (28%) are experiencing episodic cholangitis, and three (10%) are asymptomatic with persistently elevated liver function values. The consequences of a major biliary tract injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy include a complex operative repair resulting in a lengthy postoperative stay with an increased risk of death, an excessive number of perioperative diagnostic and therapeutic studies, frequent readmissions (often as emergencies), and a lifelong risk of restricture. The "cost" to these patients remains enormous.

Pneumatic dilatation or esophagomyotomy treatment for idiopathic achalasia: clinical outcomes and cost analysis.

The choice between pneumatic dilatation and surgical esophagomyotomy as the initial treatment for achalasia is controversial. The aims of this study were to determine the long term clinical outcome and costs of treating achalasia initially with pneumatic dilatation as compared to esophagomyotomy. Of 123 patients undergoing an initial pneumatic dilatation for achalasia at our institution from 1976 to 1986, 71 (58%) received no further treatment for achalasia during a mean follow up of 4.7 +/- 2.8 years. Only 15 of these 123 patients (12%) eventually underwent surgical esophagomyotomy (two for perforation during pneumatic dilatation, 13 for persistent or recurrent symptoms). The degree of dysphagia at follow up was improved to a similar degree in patients treated with an initial pneumatic dilatation as compared to patients treated with an initial esophagomyotomy. Patients with age > or = 45 years at time of initial pneumatic dilatation had fewer subsequent treatments for persistent or recurrent symptoms and had less dysphagia on follow up as compared to patients < 45 years. Subsequent pneumatic dilatations to treat persistent or recurrent symptoms were less beneficial than an initial pneumatic dilatation. The cost of esophagomyotomy was 5 times greater than the cost of pneumatic dilatation. When costs were analyzed to include subsequent treatments of symptomatic patients, the total expectant costs of treating with an initial esophagomyotomy remained 2.4 times greater than treating with an initial pneumatic dilatation. This study suggests that an initial pneumatic dilatation will be the only treatment needed for the majority of patients with achalasia. A treatment regimen starting with pneumatic dilatation has less overall costs than starting with esophagomyotomy. For each subsequent pneumatic dilatation, however, the clinical benefit leans toward surgery.

Resting energy expenditure in morbid obesity.

Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured in 112 morbidly obese adults prior to elective gastric bypass surgery. The patients studied ranged from 157 to 327% of ideal body weight. Standard nutritional assessment indices (serum total protein, albumin, total iron binding capacity, hematocrit, and white blood cell count) were within normal limits. REE was estimated by the Harris-Benedict formula using both current weight and ideal weight. Measured REE was significantly less than expected (p less than 0.01) using current weight and significantly greater than expected (p less than 0.01) when ideal weight was used as the standard. Linear regression analysis between standard indices that reflect resting metabolic rate in normal adults and measured REE in study patients did not demonstrate sufficient correlation to be clinically useful in this patient population. Standard surgical therapy may result in highly variable weight loss in this population if the wide range of resting energy expenditure and the consequential variability in individual caloric deficits is not considered. Standard predictors do not identify those patients likely to be unsuccessful with a given weight loss regimen.

The efficacy of nutritional assessment and support in cancer surgery.

Malnutrition is common in cancer patients and may be an important determinant of operative morbidity and mortality. To determine whether preoperative nutritional assessment can be used to identify a group of high-risk patients, and whether preoperative TPN decreases morbidity and mortality in this group, retrospective, nonrandomized review of 159 patients who were subjected to major cancer surgery was performed. All patients underwent preoperative multiparameter assessment. A previously developed and validated nutritional assessment model (Prognostic Nutritional Index) was used to evaluate the probability of operative complications. Based on predicted outcome (PNI), patients were assigned to either a high-risk or low-risk group for statistical comparison with actual outcome. The effect of preoperative TPN was then analyzed in both risk groups for determination of efficacy of preoperative nutritional support. Substantial malnutrition was found to exist among patients undergoing major cancer surgery and was closely correlated with subsequent morbidity and mortality. This predictive nutritional assessment model accurately identifies a subset of cancer surgery patients at increased risk of operative morbidity and mortality. In this high risk group (PNI greater than or equal to 40%), preoperative nutritional support significantly reduces operative morbidity.

Assessment of peritoneojugular shunts by direct roentgenographic examination.

The silicone rubber tubing of the LeVeen peritoneojugular shunt can be safely punctured with a 23 gauge needle. Radiopaque contrast material can be injected through the needle to delineate the cause of any obstruction to the venous tubing.