Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Public Health Dent ; 84(1): 3-12, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38031495

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association among barriers to dental care services, dentition groups, and self-reported oral health status for Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We used data from the 2017 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which included participants aged ≥65 years who were enrolled in Medicare and had completed the oral health exam. We created a dentition group variable using the detailed dental examination data to account for the presence of natural, replaced, removable, or missing teeth. Through bivariate and logistic analyses, we explored the relationship between barriers to receiving dental care services, dentition groups, and reported oral and general health statuses, along with other control variables. RESULTS: For the total Medicare population as well as in the four subgroup analyses, we showed that those with barriers to dental care services were more likely to report fair or poor oral health status. Those who were edentulous, had complete dentures, or had less than a full mouth of teeth had greater barriers and worse oral and general health than did those with all-natural teeth. Among those who reported fair or poor general health, those with less than a full mouth of teeth showed similar levels of barriers to dental care services and worse perceived oral health than did those without any teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Helping the 65 years and older population retain their teeth in good condition will improve their overall health. Investment in oral hygiene and health for the current and future Medicare populations could improve their overall health.


Assuntos
Dentição , Saúde Bucal , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Medicare , Assistência Odontológica
2.
Med Decis Making ; 39(5): 593-604, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31409187

RESUMO

Introduction. Estimating costs of medical care attributable to treatments over time is difficult due to costs that cannot be explained solely by observed risk factors. Unobserved risk factors cannot be accounted for using standard econometric techniques, potentially leading to imprecise prediction. The goal of this work is to describe methodology to account for latent variables in the prediction of longitudinal costs. Methods. Latent class growth mixture models (LCGMMs) predict class membership using observed risk factors and class-specific distributions of costs over time. Our motivating example models cost of care for children with cystic fibrosis from birth to age 17. We compare a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with LCGMMs. Both models use the same covariates and distribution to predict average costs by combinations of observed risk factors. We adopt a Bayesian estimation approach to both models and compare results using the deviance information criterion (DIC). Results. The 3-class LCGMM model has a lower DIC than the GLMM. The LCGMM latent classes include a low-cost group where costs increase slowly over time, a medium-cost group with initial higher costs than the low-cost group and with more rapidly increasing costs at older ages, and a high-cost group with a U-shaped trajectory. The risk profile-specific mixtures of classes are used to predict costs over time. The LCGMM model shows more delineation of costs by age by risk profile and with less uncertainty than the GLMM model. Conclusions. The LCGMM approach creates flexible prediction models when using longitudinal cost data. The Bayesian estimation approach to LCGMM presented fits well into cost-effectiveness modeling where the estimated trajectories and class membership can be used for prediction.


Assuntos
Teorema de Bayes , Fibrose Cística/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Econômicos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Incerteza
3.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 51(12): 1295-1303, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27740724

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous estimates of the cost of care for pediatric Cystic fibrosis (CF) showed wide variation, without specific summary of pulmonary drug costs. METHODS: Enrolled CF children from the Wisconsin newborn screening trial were evaluated quarterly per protocol. Assessments systematically included all treatments, hospitalizations, and nutritional and pulmonary outcomes. Direct medical costs from hospital billing and medical records from 1989 to 2010 were used to describe costs by age-ranges and subgroups throughout follow-up. Outpatient drugs were separated by category (pulmonary/otherwise). Inpatient and drug costs were examined by clinical risk factors (presence of meconium ileus, pancreatic insufficiency, and expected severity of genetic mutations). RESULTS: Seventy-three children were followed for an average of 12.9 years with an average annual total cost of care of $24,768. Outpatient drug costs (53%) and hospitalizations (32%) represented the majority of costs. Drug costs were 48% for pulmonary indications and 52% for non-pulmonary. Pulmonary drug costs for children taking dornase were 54% of their drug costs while pulmonary drug costs were only 31% for children not taking dornase. Significant differences in frequency of inpatient stays existed for children with pancreatic insufficiency. Substantial differences in treatment costs exist as children age and by clinical risk factor. CONCLUSION: This study provides more accurate longitudinal estimates of CF care costs throughout childhood and shows that increasing age, pancreatic insufficiency, use of dornase, and hospitalizations are key determinants of cost. These estimates can be included in evaluations of the cost-effectiveness of new, highly expensive treatments being introduced for any CF population. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1295-1303. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Fibrose Cística/economia , Desoxirribonuclease I/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Desoxirribonuclease I/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Triagem Neonatal , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Wisconsin
4.
Med Decis Making ; 35(5): 622-32, 2015 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25532826

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, more than 10% of national health expenditures are for prescription drugs. Assessing drug costs in US economic evaluation studies is not consistent, as the true acquisition cost of a drug is not known by decision modelers. Current US practice focuses on identifying one reasonable drug cost and imposing some distributional assumption to assess uncertainty. METHODS: We propose a set of Rules based on current pharmacy practice that account for the heterogeneity of drug product costs. The set of products derived from our Rules, and their associated costs, form an empirical distribution that can be used for more realistic sensitivity analyses and create transparency in drug cost parameter computation. The Rules specify an algorithmic process to select clinically equivalent drug products that reduce pill burden, use an appropriate package size, and assume uniform weighting of substitutable products. Three diverse examples show derived empirical distributions and are compared with previously reported cost estimates. RESULTS: The shapes of the empirical distributions among the 3 drugs differ dramatically, including multiple modes and different variation. Previously published estimates differed from the means of the empirical distributions. Published ranges for sensitivity analyses did not cover the ranges of the empirical distributions. In one example using lisinopril, the empirical mean cost of substitutable products was $444 (range = $23-$953) as compared with a published estimate of $305 (range = $51-$523). CONCLUSIONS: Our Rules create a simple and transparent approach to creating cost estimates of drug products and assessing their variability. The approach is easily modified to include a subset of, or different weighting for, substitutable products. The derived empirical distribution is easily incorporated into 1-way or probabilistic sensitivity analyses.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Algoritmos , Custos de Medicamentos , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/métodos , Humanos , Lisinopril/administração & dosagem , Lisinopril/economia , Naproxeno/administração & dosagem , Naproxeno/economia , Estados Unidos
5.
JAMA Intern Med ; 174(1): 114-21, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24247482

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive for detecting breast cancer. Low specificity, cost, and little evidence regarding mortality benefits, however, limit recommendations for its use to high-risk women. How breast MRI is actually used in community settings is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe breast MRI trends and indications in a community setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study at a not-for-profit health plan and multispecialty group medical practice in New England of 10,518 women aged 20 years and older enrolled in the health plan for at least 1 year who had at least 1 breast MRI between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Breast MRI counts were obtained from claims data. Clinical indication (screening, diagnostic evaluation, staging or treatment, or surveillance) was determined using a prediction model developed from electronic medical records on a subset of participants. Breast cancer risk status was assessed using claims data and, for the subset, also through electronic medical record review. RESULTS; Breast MRI use increased more than 20-fold from 6.5 per 10,000 women in 2000 to 130.7 per 10,000 in 2009. Use then declined and stabilized to 104.8 per 10,000 by 2011. Screening and surveillance, rare indications in 2000, together accounted for 57.6% of MRI use by 2011; 30.1% had a claims-documented personal history and 51.7% a family history of breast cancer, whereas 3.5% of women had a documented genetic mutation. In the subset of women with electronic medical records who received screening or surveillance MRIs, only 21.0% had evidence of meeting American Cancer Society (ACS) criteria for breast MRI. Conversely, only 48.4% of women with documented deleterious genetic mutations received breast MRI screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Breast MRI use increased steeply over 10 years and then stabilized, especially for screening and surveillance among women with family or personal history of breast cancer; most women receiving screening and surveillance breast MRIs lacked documented evidence of meeting ACS criteria, and many women with mutations were not screened. Efforts are needed to ensure that breast MRI use and documentation are focused on those women who will benefit most.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Mama/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Estudos de Coortes , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Feminino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/economia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Adulto Jovem
6.
Am J Prev Med ; 32(2): 139-42, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17196785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Employers cite a lack of information on the cost of insurance coverage for smoking-cessation treatment as a barrier to its provision. This study describes the use of a new insurance benefit for smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy, and its pharmaceutical costs to a large public employer between 2001 and 2003. METHODS: Annual enrollment and pharmaceutical claims data were collected from the health plans that contracted with the Wisconsin Department of Employee Trust Funds (ETF). State employees, retirees, and adult dependents who obtained health insurance through the ETF constituted our sample, approximately 150,000/year. Pharmacotherapy benefit use was defined as a paid claim for one of four U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved smoking-cessation medications. Pharmaceutical cost was defined as the ingredient cost (+) dispensing fee (-) member copayment. Analyses included estimation of the proportion of smokers who used the benefit each year and across 3 years, the average annual cost per user, and the per member per month (PMPM) pharmaceutical cost to the employer. Data were collected from 2001 to 2004 and analyzed in 2005-2006. RESULTS: Annual benefit use among smokers ranged from 6% to 7% with a 3-year rate of approximately 17%. The PMPM cost of the covered pharmacotherapy was approximately 0.13 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: The cost to employers of providing insurance coverage for smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy to their employees is low. By informing insurance purchasing decisions, these results may facilitate the adoption of such coverage, with the goal of ultimately reducing the proportion of employees who smoke.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico/economia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Adulto , California , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
7.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 98(11): 774-82, 2006 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16757702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many guidelines recommend screening mammography every 1-2 years for women older than 40 years; more than 70% of women now participate in routine screening. No studies have examined the societal impact of screening practices over the past decade in the United States on costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We performed a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis comparing actual and alternative screening mammography scenarios. METHODS: We used a discrete-event simulation model of breast cancer epidemiology to estimate the costs and the number of QALYs that were associated with observed screening mammography patterns in the United States from 1990 to 2000 for women aged 40 years or older. We also estimated costs and QALYS for no screening and for 64 alternative screening scenarios. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were computed. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key parameters. RESULTS: Actual U.S. screening patterns from 1990 to 2000 accrued 947.5 million QALYs and cost $166 billion over the lifetimes of the screened women, resulting in a gain of 1.7 million QALYs for an additional cost of $62.5 billion compared with no screening. Among those polices that were not dominated--i.e., for which no alternative existed that produced more QALYs for lower costs--screening all women aged 40-80 years annually per some U.S. guidelines was the most expensive option, costing $58,000 per additional QALY gained compared with the next most costly alternative, screening all women aged 45-80 years annually. Many alternative screening scenarios generated more QALYs for less cost (with savings up to $6 billion) than actual screening patterns over the study period. Sensitivity analysis showed that conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of screening mammography policies were highly sensitive to small, short-term detrimental effects on quality of life from the screening test itself. CONCLUSIONS: Choosing among the efficient policies to guide current screening recommendations requires consideration of costs to promote participation in screening and measurement of acute quality-of-life effects of mammography.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Custos Diretos de Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia/efeitos adversos , Programas de Rastreamento/efeitos adversos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Saúde da Mulher
8.
J Pediatr ; 147(3 Suppl): S101-5, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16202771

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To extend previous evaluations of costs of cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosis and examine key issues in assessing the CF cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: Costs for CF newborn screening (NBS) including CF multi-mutation testing are analyzed by using data from the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene. Electronic data from 2 Wisconsin CF centers are used to illustrate the complexity of analyzing CF health care utilization and costs. RESULTS: The current cost-per-newborn of a CF multi-mutation test is 50% higher than testing for a single mutation. Data collection for the cost-of-care study requires a combination of electronic and manual data collection; modeling of cost data requires consideration of any censoring. Hospitalizations are shown to have a large impact on costs and show high variability at the individual level. Sixty-nine percent of children with meconium ileus had some hospitalization versus 56% of children without meconium ileus. CONCLUSION: A cost-benefit analysis of CF multi-mutation testing is warranted. The study of health care cost data is complex and utilization varies between children. Individual-level modeling of CF costs must include factors contributing to the severity of the disease and allow for consideration of individual-level utilization, such as the number of hospitalizations.


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem Neonatal/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Fibrose Cística/economia , Fibrose Cística/terapia , Análise Mutacional de DNA/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Humanos , Íleus/economia , Íleus/etiologia , Imunoensaio/economia , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/economia , Mecônio , Modelos Econométricos , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Wisconsin
9.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 2(4): A15, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16164819

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Uncertainty about levels of employee use of an insurance benefit for smoking-cessation treatment has presented a barrier to employers considering the adoption of such coverage. This study examined self-reported awareness and use of a new insurance benefit for smoking-cessation treatment among a sample of Wisconsin state employees, retirees, and adult dependents. METHODS: We evaluated the self-reported use of insurance coverage for smoking-cessation treatment during the first 2 years of its availability to the Wisconsin state employee, retiree, and adult dependent population. We conducted analyses of responses to smoking-related questions in 2001 and 2002 cross-sectional surveys of insured state employees, retirees, and adult dependents, weighted to represent this population. RESULTS: In 2002, benefit use among smokers aware of the benefit was 39.6%, and benefit use among smokers unaware of the benefit was 3.5%. Only 27.4% of smokers were aware of the benefit in 2002; use among all smokers was 13.6%. Of all smokers, 30.4% used smoking-cessation treatment medication (over-the-counter or covered) in 2002. Smoking prevalence was 15.6% in 2001 and 13.2% in 2002. CONCLUSION: In an educated employee population, self-reported smoking-cessation treatment benefit use was modest among all smokers during its first 2 years of availability. Benefit awareness was low in this educated population, which may help explain low use rates, particularly given the 30% of all smokers who attempted to quit smoking with the help of smoking-cessation treatment medication. These data provide use-rate estimates for states contemplating adoption of an evidence-based smoking-cessation treatment benefit.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Adulto , Conscientização , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados , Humanos , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/economia , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Aposentadoria , Fumar/economia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/terapia , Governo Estadual , Wisconsin/epidemiologia
10.
J Pediatr ; 142(6): 617-23, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12838188

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost of diagnosing cystic fibrosis (CF) through a newborn screening program with the traditional method and to estimate the cost of CF diagnosis if a national newborn screening program is implemented. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were conducted to determine the annual number of sweat tests in 1991 and in 2000 after implementation of statewide screening. A national survey of sweat test costs was used to estimate the annual expense for diagnosing CF in the United States through newborn screening. RESULTS: Since the introduction of newborn screening for CF, the numbers of sweat tests ordered annually have decreased from 1670 to 804 (including 134 follow-up tests from screening). The current estimated annual cost of Wisconsin CF newborn screening and diagnosis is $4.58 per newborn infant. The estimated annual cost per newly diagnosed CF infant using the traditional method is $4.97 per newborn infant. If no additional sweat tests were ordered outside of the newborn screening program, the estimated annual cost of a Wisconsin CF newborn screening and diagnosis is $2.66 per newborn and $2.47 per newborn for a national CF newborn screening program. CONCLUSIONS: A CF newborn screening program provides a potentially cost-saving alternative to the traditional method of diagnosis of CF.


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Triagem Neonatal/economia , Cloretos/análise , Redução de Custos , Fibrose Cística/economia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Método de Monte Carlo , Suor/química , Tripsinogênio/análise , Wisconsin
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA