Tracking global resources and capacity for health research: time to reassess strategies and investment decisions.

The COVID-19 pandemic and more recently the Monkeypox outbreak emphasize the urgency and importance of improving the availability and equitable distribution of resources for health research across rich and poor countries. Discussions about the persistent imbalances in resource allocation for health research between rich and poor countries are not new, but little or no progress has been made in redressing these imbalances over the years. This is critical not only for emergency preparedness, but for the worlds' ability to improve population health in an equitable manner. Concerned with the lack of progress in this area, Member States of the World Health Organization requested the establishment of a Global Observatory on Health Research and Development, with the aim of consolidating, monitoring and analyzing relevant information on health research and development, with a view to informing the coordination and prioritization of new investments. In this commentary, we highlight some of the striking disparities from the Observatory's analysis over the 5 years since its establishment and reflect on what is needed to overturn stagnant progress.

WHO target product profiles to shape global research and development.

Research and development leading to new and improved health products is essential for achieving healthier lives for populations worldwide. However, new products in development do not always match the global need for products for neglected diseases and populations. To promote research, provide an incentive for investment and align products with the needs of end-users, research needs to be better coordinated and prioritized. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed target product profiles that define the characteristics required in new health products to address the greatest public health needs. A WHO target product profile document presents a need and provides guidance on what to include to consider access and equity as part of the research and development plan from the outset. WHO has also set up the Target Product Profile Directory, a free-to-use online database of characteristics used to describe desired health products, including medicines, vaccines, diagnostic tools and medical equipment. Here we describe the process of developing a WHO target product profile, and the benefits of this type of guidance. We urge product developers to share product profiles addressing unmet needs in public health, to help in progress towards global targets for better health and well-being.

Promouvoir la santé des populations à travers le monde va de pair avec la recherche-développement responsable de la conception et de l'optimisation de produits sanitaires. Pourtant, les nouveaux produits à l'étude ne répondent pas toujours aux exigences mondiales des populations et maladies négligées. En vue de promouvoir la recherche, de favoriser les investissements et d'aligner les produits sur les besoins des utilisateurs finaux, les travaux doivent être mieux coordonnés et leurs priorités, mieux définies. L'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) a donc élaboré des profils de produits cibles qui déterminent les caractéristiques requises pour les nouveaux produits sanitaires, afin qu'ils correspondent davantage aux besoins les plus criants en matière de santé publique. Un profil de produit cible établi par l'OMS est un document qui met en évidence un besoin et fournit des indications sur les aspects à prendre en compte pour garantir l'accès et l'équité dès le départ dans le plan de recherche-développement. L'OMS a également publié un Répertoire des profils de produits cibles, une base de données en ligne consultable gratuitement qui reprend les caractéristiques employées pour décrire les produits sanitaires souhaités (médicaments, vaccins, outils diagnostiques et équipements médicaux). Dans le présent document, nous détaillons le processus de développement d'un profil de produit cible par l'OMS, mais aussi les avantages que comportent de telles indications. Nous encourageons vivement les laboratoires à partager les profils de produits qui répondent à des besoins non satisfaits en matière de santé publique, afin de contribuer à avancer vers les objectifs mondiaux de santé et de bien-être.

La investigación y el desarrollo de productos sanitarios nuevos y mejorados son esenciales para que las poblaciones de todo el mundo vivan más sanas. Sin embargo, los productos nuevos en desarrollo no siempre se ajustan a las necesidades mundiales de productos para enfermedades y poblaciones desatendidas. Para promover la investigación, incentivar la inversión y adaptar los productos a las necesidades de los usuarios finales, es necesario coordinar mejor la investigación y establecer prioridades. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha elaborado perfiles de productos específicos que definen las características que deben reunir los productos sanitarios nuevos para satisfacer las principales necesidades de salud pública. Un documento de perfil de producto específico de la OMS presenta una necesidad y ofrece orientación sobre lo que debe incluirse para tener en cuenta el acceso y la equidad como parte del plan de investigación y desarrollo desde el principio. La OMS también ha creado el Directorio de Perfiles de Productos Específicos, una base de datos en línea de uso gratuito con las características utilizadas para describir los productos sanitarios deseados, incluidos medicamentos, vacunas, herramientas de diagnóstico y equipos médicos. En el presente documento, describimos el proceso de elaboración de un perfil de producto específico de la OMS y las ventajas de este tipo de orientación. Instamos a los desarrolladores de productos a compartir perfiles de productos que aborden necesidades no cubiertas en salud pública para contribuir al avance hacia los objetivos mundiales de mejora de la salud y el bienestar.

The Self-Testing AfRica (STAR) Initiative: accelerating global access and scale-up of HIV self-testing.

INTRODUCTION: HIV self-testing (HIVST) was first proposed as an additional option to standard HIV testing services in the 1980s. By 2015, two years after the first HIVST kit was approved for the American market and the year in which Unitaid invested in the "HIV Self-Testing AfRica (STAR) Initiative," HIVST remained unexplored with negligible access in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). However, rapid progress had been made. This commentary outlines the interlinked market, regulatory and policy barriers that had inhibited product development and kept HIVST out of LMIC policy. We detail the components of STAR that enabled rapid HIVST scale-up, including critical investments in implementation, research, market forecasting, and engagement with manufacturers and regulators. DISCUSSION: The STAR Initiative has generated crucial information about how to distribute HIVST products effectively, ethically and efficiently. Service delivery models range from clinic-based distribution to workplace and partner-delivered approaches to reach first-time male testers, to community outreach to sex workers and general population "hotspots." These data directly informed supportive policy, notably the 2016 WHO guidelines strongly recommending HIVST as an additional testing approach, and regulatory change through support for WHO prequalification of the first HIVST kit in 2017. In July 2015, only two countries had national HIVST policies and were implementing HIVST. Three years later, 59 countries have policies, actively implemented in 28, with an additional 53 countries reporting policies under development. By end-November 2018 several quality-assured HIVST products had been registered, including two WHO prequalified tests. STAR Initiative countries have drafted regulations governing in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST products. With enabling policies, pre-qualification and regulations in place, donor procurement of kits has increased rapidly, to a forecasted estimate of 16 million HIVST kits procured by 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The STAR Initiative provided a strong foundation to introduce HIVST in LMICs and allow for rapid scale-up based on the wealth of multi-country evidence gathered. Together with sustained coordination and acceleration of market development work, HIVST can help address the testing gap and provide a focused and cost-effective means to expand access to treatment and prevention services.

Ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030: Scientific Developments from the 2016 INTEREST Conference in Yaoundé, Cameroon.

The underpinning theme of the 2016 INTEREST Conference held in Yaoundé, Cameroon, 3-6 May 2016 was ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030. Focused primarily on HIV treatment, pathogenesis and prevention research in resource-limited settings, the conference attracted 369 active delegates from 34 countries, of which 22 were in Africa. Presentations on treatment optimization, acquired drug resistance, care of children and adolescents, laboratory monitoring and diagnostics, implementation challenges, HIV prevention, key populations, vaccine and cure, hepatitis C, mHealth, financing the HIV response and emerging pathogens, were accompanied by oral, mini-oral and poster presentations. Spirited plenary debates on the UNAIDS 90-90-90 treatment cascade goal and on antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis took place. Joep Lange career guidance sessions and grantspersonship sessions attracted early career researchers. At the closing ceremony, the Yaoundé Declaration called on African governments; UNAIDS; development, bilateral, and multilateral partners; and civil society to adopt urgent and sustained approaches to end HIV by 2030.

Towards Multidisciplinary HIV-Cure Research: Integrating Social Science with Biomedical Research.

The quest for a cure for HIV remains a timely and key challenge for the HIV research community. Despite significant scientific advances, current HIV therapy regimens do not completely eliminate the negative impact of HIV on the immune system; and the economic impact of treating all people infected with HIV globally, for the duration of their lifetimes, presents significant challenges. This article discusses, from a multidisciplinary approach, critical social, behavioral, ethical, and economic issues permeating the HIV-cure research agenda. As part of a search for an HIV cure, both the perspective of patients/participants and clinical researchers should be taken into account. In addition, continued efforts should be made to involve and educate the broader community.

The HIV Cure Research Agenda: The Role of Mathematical Modelling and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The research agenda towards an HIV cure is building rapidly. In this article, we discuss the reasons for and methodological approach to using mathematical modeling and cost-effectiveness analysis in this agenda. We provide a brief description of the proof of concept for cure and the current directions of cure research. We then review the types of clinical economic evaluations, including cost analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis. We describe the use of mathematical modeling and cost-effectiveness analysis early in the HIV epidemic as well as in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. We then highlight the novel methodology of Value of Information analysis and its potential role in the planning of clinical trials. We close with recommendations for modeling and cost-effectiveness analysis in the HIV cure agenda.