Subtyping of Primary Aldosteronism in the AVIS-2 Study: Assessment of Selectivity and Lateralization.

CONTEXT: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the key test for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA), but its interpretation varies widely across referral centers and this can adversely affect the management of PA patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate in a real-life study the rate of bilateral success and identification of unilateral aldosteronism and their impact on blood pressure outcomes in PA subtyped by AVS. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: In a retrospective analysis of the largest international registry of individual AVS data (AVIS-2 study), we investigated how different cut-off values of the selectivity index (SI) and lateralization index (LI) affected rate of bilateral success, identification of unilateral aldosteronism, and blood pressure outcomes. RESULTS: AVIS-2 recruited 1625 individual AVS studies performed between 2000 and 2015 in 19 tertiary referral centers. Under unstimulated conditions, the rate of biochemically confirmed bilateral AVS success progressively decreased with increasing SI cut-offs; furthermore, with currently used LI cut-offs, the rate of identified unilateral PA leading to adrenalectomy was as low as <25%. A within-patient pairwise comparison of 402 AVS performed both under unstimulated and cosyntropin-stimulated conditions showed that cosyntropin increased the confirmed rate of bilateral selectivity for SI cut-offs ≥ 2.0, but reduced lateralization rates (P < 0.001). Post-adrenalectomy outcomes were not improved by use of cosyntropin or more restrictive diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSION: Commonly used SI and LI cut-offs are associated with disappointingly low rates of biochemically defined AVS success and identified unilateral PA. Evidence-based protocols entailing less restrictive interpretative cut-offs might optimize the clinical use of this costly and invasive test. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab XX: 0-0, 2020).

Assessment of the Quantitative Value Usefulness of the Aldosterone-Renin Ratio (ARR) for Primary Aldosteronism (AQUARR) Study.

Current guidelines recommend use of the aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR) for the case detection of primary aldosteronism (PA), the most common cause of secondary hypertension, in selected hypertensive patients. "Confirmatory" tests are then recommended in patients who tested positive at the ARR to exclude from further diagnostic work-up false positive results. Based on our experience we hypothesized that the ARR carries quantitative information, which can avoid the need of confirmatory tests. We herein describe a study protocol to identify the ARR cut-off value with a high specificity for the exclusion of aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) based on analysis of two large prospectively collected datasets of patients in which a conclusive diagnosis of APA was made by the four corners criteria. This will also serve to investigate the diagnostic gain provided over this ARR cut-off value by one confirmatory test, the captopril challenge test. Hence, with this protocol we expect to identify an ARR cut-off value that might prevent further testing in patients with either a low or a high probability of APA. This could translate in a higher diagnostic accuracy and, by preventing unnecessary invasive testing, into a substantial saving of money, time, and resources.

Molecular biology based assessment of green tea effects on oxidative stress and cardiac remodelling in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cardiovascular disease, the most common cause for morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has prompted the exploration of multiple approaches to improve outcomes. Cardiovascular risk factors such as oxidative stress (OxSt) and cardiac remodelling are common in ESRD and dialysis patients. Green tea (GT) is well recognized as reducing OxSt. This 6 months study evaluated in 20 ESRD patients under chronic dialysis, the effect of GT treatment (1 g/day as commercially available capsule) on cellular and plasma OxSt and proliferation related markers using a molecular biology approach. METHODS: Mononuclear cell p22(phox), Haeme Oxygenase (HO)-1 protein expression, and phosphorylated ERK1/2 status were evaluated in dialysis patients at baseline, after 3 and 6 months of GT treatment by Western blot analysis and plasma oxLDL by ELISA. Cardiac remodelling was assessed by echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) mass determination at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: GT treatment reduced p22(phox) and pERK1/2 from baseline while HO-1 increased. At baseline, LV mass correlated with both p22(phox) and oxLDL. GT treatment decreased LV mass from baseline, which correlated with oxLDL. 9 patients had LV hypertrophy at baseline, which, at 6 months, was normalized in 5 and reduced in 3, showing a parallel decrease of p22(phox), pERK1/2, oxLDL and increase of HO-1. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with GT decreased the expression of OxSt-related proteins tightly associated with cardiovascular disease and decreased LV mass. It appears highly likely that the addition of GT can provide a benefit in terms of cardiovascular protection in dialysis patients.

A stress reaction affects assessment of selectivity of adrenal venous sampling and of lateralization of aldosterone excess in primary aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: A stress reaction involving increased cortisol release, which has not been documented thus far, might affect the assessment of selectivity of catheterization during adrenal venous sampling (AVS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an ACTH-driven cortisol release occurs during AVS and whether it influences the assessment of selectivity by the step-up of cortisol (plasma cortisol concentrations, PCC) between the adrenal vein blood (PCC(SIDE)) and the inferior vena cava (PCC(IVC)), e.g. the selectivity index (SI). DESIGN AND METHODS: We determined the SI in samples obtained simultaneously at starting AVS (t-15) and again after 15  min (t0) in 34 consecutive patients with proven aldosterone-producing adenoma. We then calculated the SI with PCC(SIDE) obtained at t-15 and at t0, and the PCC(IVC) values obtained at the different time point, thus simulating sequential AVS. RESULTS: The PCC(SIDE) and the SI fell significantly from t-15 to t0 on both the sides. When PCC(SIDE) obtained at t-15 was combined with PCC(IVC) at t0, the SI values were higher than those obtained with simultaneously drawn samples. This led to label as selective more AVS studies than with bilaterally simultaneous data, especially when using higher cutoffs for the SI. CONCLUSIONS: A transient increase in cortisol release from both adrenal glands occurs in the majority of the patients who undergo AVS. This stress reaction can influence the assessment of both the selectivity of the catheterization during the sequential AVS technique and the lateralization of aldosterone excess.

Adrenal vein sampling for primary aldosteronism: the assessment of selectivity and lateralization of aldosterone excess baseline and after adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal vein sampling is crucial for identifying the primary aldosteronism subtypes, but the cutoff values for ascertaining selectivity of catheterization and lateralization of aldosterone secretion remain controversial. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety of adrenal vein sampling, the cutoff values for the selectivity and lateralization indexes, and the effect of adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation on selectivity index and lateralization index performance. DESIGN: We assessed the proportion of selective adrenal vein sampling at different selectivity index cutoff values in 151 consecutive patients with primary aldosteronism undergoing bilaterally simultaneous adrenal vein sampling. Aldosterone-producing adenoma was diagnosed on the basis of the evidence of primary aldosteronism and lateralized aldosterone secretion, adenoma at pathological examination, and normokalemia, and correction of primary aldosteronism and cure or improvement of hypertension at follow-up. In 44 patients with bilaterally selective adrenal vein sampling and unequivocal diagnosis of aldosterone-producing adenoma on the basis of all these criteria, we examined the cutoff values of the lateralization index for assessing the lateralization of aldosterone excess and the effect of adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation on selectivity index and lateralization index. RESULTS: Adrenal vein rupture occurred in one case (0.7%). Bilaterally selective adrenal vein sampling decreased steadily (from 79.9 to 40.2%) with increase in the selectivity index cutoffs from 1.1 to 5.0. Likewise, the proportion of correctly identified aldosterone-producing adenomas decreased (from 95.5 to 43.2%) with increase in lateralization index cutoffs from 1.125 to 5.0. Adrenocorticotropic hormone improved the assessment of selectivity but exerted a confounding effect on lateralization index. CONCLUSION: Adrenal vein sampling is safe; increasing the selectivity index cutoffs lowers the number of usable adrenal vein samplings; higher lateralization index cutoff values lead to missing a proportion of aldosterone-producing adenomas. The improved selectivity rate provided by adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation should be weighed against the loss of correct lateralization.

Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part I: Methodological issues for assessment in the different vascular beds: a statement by the Working Group on Endothelin and Endothelial Factors of the European Society of Hypertension.

An enormous number of studies in the last two decades have been devoted to investigating the role of the endothelium in cardiovascular diseases. Nonetheless, the optimal methodology for investigating the multifaceted aspects of endothelial dysfunction is still under debate. Biochemical markers, molecular genetic tests and invasive and non-invasive tools with and without pharmacological and physiological stimuli have been introduced. Furthermore newer pharmacological tools have been proposed. However, the application of these methodologies should fulfil a number of requirements in order to provide conclusive answers in this area of research. Thus, the most relevant methodological issues in the research on endothelial function and dysfunction are summarized in this paper.