Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250061, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33857240

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Systems epidemiology approaches may lead to a better understanding of the complex and dynamic multi-level constellation of contributors to cancer risk and outcomes and help target interventions. This grant portfolio analysis aimed to describe the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) investments in systems epidemiology and to identify gaps in the cancer systems epidemiology portfolio. METHODS: The analysis examined grants funded (2013-2018) through seven NIH systems science Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) as well as cancer-specific systems epidemiology grants funded by NCI during that same time. Study characteristics were extracted from the grant abstracts and specific aims and coded. RESULTS: Of the 137 grants awarded under the NIH FOAs, 52 (38%) included systems epidemiology. Only five (4%) were focused on cancer systems epidemiology. The NCI-wide search (N = 453 grants) identified 35 grants (8%) that included cancer systems epidemiology in their specific aims. Most of these grants examined epidemiology and surveillance-based questions (60%); fewer addressed clinical care or clinical trials (37%). Fifty-four percent looked at multiple scales within the individual (e.g., cell, tissue, organ), 49% looked beyond the individual (e.g., individual, community, population), and few (9%) included both. Across all grants examined, the systems epidemiology grants primarily focused on discovery or prediction, rather than on impacts of intervention or policy. CONCLUSIONS: The most notable finding was that grants focused on cancer versus other diseases reflected a small percentage of the portfolio, highlighting the need to encourage more cancer systems epidemiology research. Opportunities include encouraging more multiscale research and continuing the support for broad examination of domains in these studies. Finally, the nascent discipline of systems epidemiology could benefit from the creation of standard terminology and definitions to guide future progress.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Organização do Financiamento/economia , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economia , Neoplasias , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 103(6): 501-7, 2011 Mar 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21293027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer kills more than 1 million people worldwide each year. Whereas several human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers have been identified, the role of HPV in lung carcinogenesis remains controversial. METHODS: We selected 450 lung cancer patients from an Italian population-based case-control study, the Environment and Genetics in Lung Cancer Etiology. These patients were selected from those with an adequate number of unstained tissue sections and included all those who had never smoked and a random sample of the remaining patients. We used real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to test specimens from these patients for HPV DNA, specifically for E6 gene sequences from HPV16 and E7 gene sequences from HPV18. We also tested a subset of 92 specimens from all never-smokers and a random selection of smokers for additional HPV types by a PCR-based test for at least 54 mucosal HPV genotypes. DNA was extracted from ethanol- or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue under strict PCR clean conditions. The prevalence of HPV in tumor tissue was investigated. RESULTS: Specimens from 399 of 450 patients had adequate DNA for analysis. Most patients were current (220 patients or 48.9%) smokers, and 92 patients (20.4%) were women. When HPV16 and HPV18 type-specific primers were used, two specimens were positive for HPV16 at low copy number but were negative on additional type-specific HPV16 testing. Neither these specimens nor the others examined for a broad range of HPV types were positive for any HPV type. CONCLUSIONS: When DNA contamination was avoided and state-of-the-art highly sensitive HPV DNA detection assays were used, we found no evidence that HPV was associated with lung cancer in a representative Western population. Our results provide the strongest evidence to date to rule out a role for HPV in lung carcinogenesis in Western populations.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Alphapapillomavirus/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Proteínas Oncogênicas Virais/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Proteínas Repressoras/genética , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/complicações , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/diagnóstico , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/virologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA