RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the legal, professional, and consumer status of prescribers dispensing legend and over-the-counter drugs in the United States. METHODS: Legal and academic databases were searched to identify those states that permit prescribers to dispense medications to patients and any limitations on such practice. In addition, prescribers and patients-consumers were surveyed to learn about the prevalence and perceptions of such practice. The use of drug samples was explicitly excluded from the study. MAIN RESULTS: Surveys were obtained from 556 physicians, 64 NPs, and 999 patient-consumers of drugs dispensed by prescribers. Forty-four states authorize prescriber dispensing. Midlevel practitioners (i.e., NPs and physician assistants) are authorized to dispense in 43 states. Thirty-two states do not require dispensing prescribers to compete additional registration to dispense medications, and 30 states require some level of compliance with pharmacy practice requirements. Prescriber dispensing is common, independent of patient age or insurance coverage. Prescriber dispensing appears driven by physician and patient perceptions of convenience and cost reductions. Future dispensing is likely to increase due to consumers' satisfaction with the practice. Consumer self-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were equivalent between pharmacist- and physician-dispensed drugs, but urgent and emergency clinic ADR consultations were slightly lower with physician dispensing. CONCLUSIONS: Prescriber dispensing is firmly entrenched in the U.S. health care system, is likely to increase, does not appear to increase ADRs, and may reduce urgent care and emergency department visits. The reduction in urgent care and emergency department visits requires further study to confirm these preliminary findings.
Assuntos
Coleta de Dados , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Profissionais de Enfermagem/normas , Médicos/normas , Honorários por Prescrição de Medicamentos/normas , Adulto , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente/economia , Assistência Farmacêutica/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The Walgreen Companies recently settled a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) administrative action and other investigations arising in connection with a controlled substance distribution facility in Florida and several of its retail pharmacies. These DEA enforcement actions upon a national chain pharmacy have resulted in a series of policies and professional practices that appear to functionally disrupt continuity of patient care. The policy issues transcend the professions and go to the core of our responsibilities to patients. It is unfortunate that regulations intended to prevent diversion also dramatically disrupt interprofessional relations. Based on public statements of professional organizations, unification on this issue seems possible. This presents an opportunity to revisit collaboration among prescribers and pharmacists in legislative and regulatory advocacy. A uniform definition of "legitimate medical purpose" is needed to maximize patient access to needed pharmacotherapy while remaining vigilant for diversion.