Lessons learned from a survey of the diagnosis and treatment journeys of postmenopausal women with hypertension.

In this qualitative, experiential study, 300 members of the database of WomenHeart: The National Coalition for Women With Heart Disease completed an online survey about hypertension diagnosis and treatment, patient education, and perceptions of this and related conditions. Based on the findings from the survey, characteristics of the prototypical journey were identified. To the extent to which the surveyed WomenHeart members represent typical experiences, this survey provides insights into common hurdles women encounter in their journey throughout the hypertension diagnosis and treatment process. Results of this study suggest the need for a patient-centric approach to hypertension management and to implement programs with the intention of comprehensively assessing and meeting individual needs. Further studies would be of value to expand on patients' journeys in the management of hypertension and identify the types of products, services, and programming that most effectively support treatment adherence and achievement of optimal blood pressure control.

Progression to type 2 diabetes, healthcare utilization, and cost among pre-diabetic patients with or without comorbid hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined progression to type 2 diabetes and compared healthcare utilization and costs among patients with pre-diabetes, with or without comorbid hypertension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study drew from a large national claims database (2003-2008). Patients were ≥18 years of age with a medical claim or lab value indicating the presence of pre-diabetes. The index date was the first pre-diabetes diagnosis (ICD-9 codes 790.21, 790.22, 790.29) or qualifying lab value of fasting plasma glucose or impaired glucose intolerance. All patients had ≥12-month data pre- and post- index date. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors affecting progression to type 2 diabetes, and to estimate the impact of hypertension status and diabetes progression on healthcare utilization and cost. RESULTS: 144,410 patients met study criteria, with an average follow-up of 802 (SD 344) days. Among participants, 30.7% progressed to diabetes, with a mean 288 (SD 340) days from pre-diabetes identification to diabetes diagnosis. Compared with patients who did not progress, the total adjusted medical costs for patients who developed diabetes increased by $1429 in 1 year, $2451 in 2 years, and $3621 in 3 years (p < 0.001). Patients with concomitant hypertension were significantly more likely to progress to type 2 diabetes, and had higher total medical costs compared to patients without hypertension ($476 higher in 1 year, $949 in 2 years, $1378 in 3 years). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-diabetes who progressed to type 2 diabetes had higher healthcare utilization and costs compared with patients who did not. The presence of hypertension substantially increased costs and was associated with higher likelihood of diabetes progression. Blood pressure, lifestyle intervention, body mass index, and other factors cannot be examined due to the limitations of the data. Results may not be generalizable to patients with insurance other than commercial or Medicare.

Cardiovascular outcomes among patients newly initiating atorvastatin or simvastatin therapy: a large database analysis of managed care plans in the United States.

BACKGROUND: While the results of randomized clinical trials have indicated that statins improve outcomes in patients without cardiovascular disease (CVD), it remains uncertain whether there are differences in efficacy between statins, particularly in clinical practice, where the public health implications could be substantial. OBJECTIVE: We assessed cardiovascular (CV) outcomes among primary-prevention patients newly initiating therapy with atorvastatin or simvastatin. METHODS: Using claims data from 92 US managed care plans, we identified new statin users without CVD who initiated atorvastatin (10 or 20 mg) or simvastatin (20 or 40 mg) from January 2003 to September 2005 and were continuously enrolled in a covered plan for > or = 12 months before and > or = 1 month after the initiation of statin therapy. The main outcome was the time to the first CV event (hospitalization related to myocardial infarction, angina, or coronary artery disease; stroke; amaurosis fugax; transient ischemic attack; peripheral or central nervous system vascular disease; or revascularization). Persistence with treatment was calculated in terms of the number of days during follow-up that a patient remained on statin treatment, starting from the date of the first prescription fill to the end of the study or the date at which therapy was discontinued. RESULTS: A total of 168,973 patients initiating atorvastatin (mean dose, 13.5 mg) and 50,658 patients initiating simvastatin (mean dose, 28.5 mg) were followed for a median of 1.5 years. Atorvastatin patients were significantly more persistent with treatment than simvastatin patients (median treatment duration, 158 vs 124 days, respectively; P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, type of health plan, payer type, geographic region, calendar year of statin initiation, physician specialty, comorbidities, concomitant therapies, and total direct health care costs in the year before statin initiation, use of atorvastatin was associated with significantly fewer CV events compared with use of simvastatin (hazard ratio = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In these patients without CVD, atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg was associated with a significantly lower risk of CV events compared with simvastatin 20 or 40 mg. Further studies are required to determine whether differences in persistence, achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, or other factors contribute to these differences in outcomes.