Automated image quality assessment for selecting among multiple magnetic resonance image acquisitions in the German National Cohort study.

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the perception of substandard image quality may prompt repetition of the respective image acquisition protocol. Subsequently selecting the preferred high-quality image data from a series of acquisitions can be challenging. An automated workflow may facilitate and improve this selection. We therefore aimed to investigate the applicability of an automated image quality assessment for the prediction of the subjectively preferred image acquisition. Our analysis included data from 11,347 participants with whole-body MRI examinations performed as part of the ongoing prospective multi-center German National Cohort (NAKO) study. Trained radiologic technologists repeated any of the twelve examination protocols due to induced setup errors and/or subjectively unsatisfactory image quality and chose a preferred acquisition from the resultant series. Up to 11 quantitative image quality parameters were automatically derived from all acquisitions. Regularized regression and standard estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Controlling for setup variations in 2342 series of two or more acquisitions, technologists preferred the repetition over the initial acquisition in 1116 of 1396 series in which the initial setup was retained (79.9%, range across protocols: 73-100%). Image quality parameters then commonly showed statistically significant differences between chosen and discarded acquisitions. In regularized regression across all protocols, 'structured noise maximum' was the strongest predictor for the technologists' choice, followed by 'N/2 ghosting average'. Combinations of the automatically derived parameters provided an area under the ROC curve between 0.51 and 0.74 for the prediction of the technologists' choice. It is concluded that automated image quality assessment can, despite considerable performance differences between protocols and anatomical regions, contribute substantially to identifying the subjective preference in a series of MRI acquisitions and thus provide effective decision support to readers.

A Context-based Chatbot Surpasses Trained Radiologists and Generic ChatGPT in Following the ACR Appropriateness Guidelines.

Background Radiological imaging guidelines are crucial for accurate diagnosis and optimal patient care as they result in standardized decisions and thus reduce inappropriate imaging studies. Purpose In the present study, we investigated the potential to support clinical decision-making using an interactive chatbot designed to provide personalized imaging recommendations from American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria documents using semantic similarity processing. Methods We utilized 209 ACR appropriateness criteria documents as specialized knowledge base and employed LlamaIndex, a framework that allows to connect large language models with external data, and the ChatGPT 3.5-Turbo to create an appropriateness criteria contexted chatbot (accGPT). Fifty clinical case files were used to compare the accGPT's performance against general radiologists at varying experience levels and to generic ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0. Results All chatbots reached at least human performance level. For the 50 case files, the accGPT performed best in providing correct recommendations that were "usually appropriate" according to the ACR criteria and also did provide the highest proportion of consistently correct answers in comparison with generic chatbots and radiologists. Further, the chatbots provided substantial time and cost savings, with an average decision time of 5 minutes and a cost of 0.19 € for all cases, compared to 50 minutes and 29.99 € for radiologists (both p < 0.01). Conclusion ChatGPT-based algorithms have the potential to substantially improve the decision-making for clinical imaging studies in accordance with ACR guidelines. Specifically, a context-based algorithm performed superior to its generic counterpart, demonstrating the value of tailoring AI solutions to specific healthcare applications.

K-t GRAPPA-accelerated 4D flow MRI of liver hemodynamics: influence of different acceleration factors on qualitative and quantitative assessment of blood flow.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility of k-t parallel imaging for accelerated 4D flow MRI in the hepatic vascular system by investigating the impact of different acceleration factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: k-t GRAPPA accelerated 4D flow MRI of the liver vasculature was evaluated in 16 healthy volunteers at 3T with acceleration factors R = 3, R = 5, and R = 8 (2.0 × 2.5 × 2.4 mm(3), TR = 82 ms), and R = 5 (TR = 41 ms); GRAPPA R = 2 was used as the reference standard. Qualitative flow analysis included grading of 3D streamlines and time-resolved particle traces. Quantitative evaluation assessed velocities, net flow, and wall shear stress (WSS). RESULTS: Significant scan time savings were realized for all acceleration factors compared to standard GRAPPA R = 2 (21-71 %) (p < 0.001). Quantification of velocities and net flow offered similar results between k-t GRAPPA R = 3 and R = 5 compared to standard GRAPPA R = 2. Significantly increased leakage artifacts and noise were seen between standard GRAPPA R = 2 and k-t GRAPPA R = 8 (p < 0.001) with significant underestimation of peak velocities and WSS of up to 31 % in the hepatic arterial system (p <0.05). WSS was significantly underestimated up to 13 % in all vessels of the portal venous system for k-t GRAPPA R = 5, while significantly higher values were observed for the same acceleration with higher temporal resolution in two veins (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: k-t acceleration of 4D flow MRI is feasible for liver hemodynamic assessment with acceleration factors R = 3 and R = 5 resulting in a scan time reduction of at least 40 % with similar quantitation of liver hemodynamics compared with GRAPPA R = 2.