Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 13, 2017 01 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28056974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite substantial investment in detection, early intervention and evidence-based treatments, current management strategies for diabetes-associated retinopathy and cardiovascular disease are largely based on real-time and face-to-face approaches. There are limited data re telehealth facilitation in type 2 diabetes management. Therefore, we aim to investigate efficacy of telehealth facilitation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease care in high-risk vulnerable Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in remote/very remote Australia. METHODS: Using a pre-post intervention design, 600 Indigenous Australians with type 2 diabetes will be recruited from three primary-care health-services in the Northern Territory. Diabetes status will be based on clinical records. There will be four technological interventions: 1. Baseline retinal imaging [as a real-time patient education/engagement tool and telehealth screening strategy]. 2. A lifestyle survey tool administered at ≈ 6-months. 3. At ≈ 6- and 18-months, an electronic cardiovascular disease and diabetes decision-support tool based on current guidelines in the Standard Treatment Manual of the Central Australian Rural Practitioner's Association to generate clinical recommendations. 4. Mobile tablet technology developed to enhance participant engagement in self-management. Data will include: Pre-intervention clinical and encounter-history data, baseline retinopathy status, decision-support and survey data/opportunistic mobile tablet encounter data. The primary outcome is increased participant adherence to clinical appointments, a marker of engagement and self-management. A cost-benefit analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: Remoteness is a major barrier to provision and uptake of best-practice chronic disease management. Telehealth, beyond videoconferencing of consultations, could facilitate evidence-based management of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in Indigenous Australians and serve as a model for other conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN 12616000370404 was retrospectively registered on 22/03/2016.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Telemedicina/normas , Austrália/etnologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etnologia , Doença Crônica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde do Indígena/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde do Indígena/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/etnologia , Nova Zelândia , Northern Territory , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Projetos de Pesquisa , Saúde da População Rural , Autocuidado/métodos , Apoio Social , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Comunicação por Videoconferência/organização & administração , Comunicação por Videoconferência/normas
4.
Health Econ ; 15(6): 645-52, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16470718

RESUMO

Self-reported health (SRH) is one of the most frequently employed measures for assessing income-related health inequalities between counties. A previous study has shown that 28% of respondents changed their assessment of their health status when asked a SRH question on two occasions in the same survey (first as part of self-completed questionnaire and then in a personal interview). This study re-examines this issue using another survey where SRH was again asked twice of respondents, but this time the personal interview was first and self-completion second. We find the same variation in responses, but the predominant direction is away from the 'extreme' categories 'Excellent' and 'Poor' which is the opposite direction to the previous study. We therefore conclude that the most likely explanation is a mode of administration effect that makes people less likely to choose the extreme categories in a self-completion questionnaire, but not a personal interview. However, this effect has a relatively minor impact on measures of inequality. This is due to a large proportion of the movement (i.e. movement to the middle) not being related to income and hence does not systematically impact on the cumulative distribution of health across this measure of socio-economic status.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Autorrevelação , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Classe Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA