Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hear Res ; 446: 108997, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564963

RESUMO

The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition. Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation. Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case. The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Nervo Coclear , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico , Audição , Neuroma Acústico , Humanos , Neuroma Acústico/cirurgia , Neuroma Acústico/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Nervo Coclear/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Idoso , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento , Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Estimulação Acústica , Seleção de Pacientes
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(2): 673-682, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535079

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The clinician-graded electronic facial paralysis assessment (eFACE) is a relatively new digital tool for assessing facial palsy. The present study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the eFACE. METHODS: Forward-backward translation from the original English version was performed. Videos and photographs from 65 adult patients with unilateral facial paralysis (any severity, time course, and etiology) were evaluated twice by five otolaryngologists with varying levels of experience in facial palsy evaluation. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α and the intra- and inter-rater reliability were measured using intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was established by calculating Spearman's rho correlation (ρ) between the eFACE and the House-Brackmann scale (H-B) and Pearson's correlation (r) between the eFACE and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS). RESULTS: The Spanish version of the eFACE showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.8). The intra-rater reliability was nearly perfect for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.95-0.99), static score (0.92-0.96), and dynamic score (0.96-0.99) and important-to-excellent for synkinesis score (0.79-0.96). The inter-rater reliability was excellent for the total score (0.85-0.93), static score (0.80-0.90), and dynamic score (0.90-0.95) and moderate-to-important for the synkinesis score (0.55-0.78). The eFACE had a very strong correlation with the H-B (ρ = - 0.88 and - 0.85 for each evaluation, p < 0.001) and the SFGS (r = 0.92 and 0.91 each evaluation, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the eFACE is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment of facial function in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with facial paralysis.


Assuntos
Paralisia de Bell , Paralisia Facial , Sincinesia , Adulto , Humanos , Paralisia Facial/cirurgia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Face , Eletrônica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA