Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Healthc Qual ; 46(2): 109-118, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150376

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: The early period of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid increase in out-of-office care. To capture the impact from COVID-19 on care for patients with hypertension, a questionnaire was disseminated to community health center clinicians. The extent, types, and causes of care delays and disruptions were assessed along with adaptations and innovations used to address them. Clinician attitudinal changes and perspectives on future hypertension care were also assessed. Of the 65 respondents, most (90.8%) reported their patients with hypertension experienced care delays or disruptions, including lack of follow-up, lack of blood pressure assessment, and missed medication refills or orders. To address care delays and disruptions for patients with hypertension, respondents indicated that their health center increased the use of telehealth or other technology, made home blood pressure devices available to patients, expanded outreach and care coordination, provided medication refills for longer periods of time, and used new care delivery options. The use of self-measured blood pressure monitoring (58.5%) and telehealth (43.1%) was identified as the top adaptations that should be sustained to increase access to and patient engagement with hypertension care; however, barriers to both remain. Policy and system level changes are needed to support value-based care models that include self-measured blood pressure and telehealth.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipertensão , Telemedicina , Humanos , Pressão Sanguínea , Pandemias , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Centros Comunitários de Saúde
2.
BMJ Glob Health ; 4(4): e001601, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31354975

RESUMO

Increased investment in primary care is associated with lower healthcare costs and improved population health. The allocation of scarce resources should be driven by robust models that adequately describe primary care activities and spending within a health system, and allow comparisons within and across health systems. However, disparate definitions result in wide variations in estimates of spending on primary care. We propose a new model that allows for a dynamic assessment of primary care spending (PC Spend) within the context of a system's total healthcare budget. The model articulates varied definitions of primary care through a tiered structure which includes overall spending on primary care services, spending on services delivered by primary care professionals and spending delivered by providers that can be characterised by the '4Cs' (first contact, continuous, comprehensive and coordinated care). This unifying framework allows a more refined description of services to be included in any estimate of primary care spend and also supports measurement of primary care spending across nations of varying economic development, accommodating data limitations and international health system differences. It provides a goal for best accounting while also offering guidance, comparability and assessments of how primary care expenditures are associated with outcomes. Such a framework facilitates comparison through the creation of standard definitions and terms, and it also has the potential to foster new areas of research that facilitate robust policy analysis at the national and international levels.

3.
Fam Med ; 51(2): 185-192, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30736045

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fee for service (FFS), the dominant payment model for primary care in the United States, compensates physicians based on volume. There are many initiatives exploring alternative payment models that prioritize value over volume. The Family Medicine for America's Health (FMAHealth) Payment Team has developed a comprehensive primary care payment (CPCP) model to support the move from activity- and volume-based payment to performance-based payment for value. METHODS: In 2016-2017, the FMAHealth Payment Team performed a comprehensive study of the current state of primary care payment models in the United States. This study explored the features, motivations, successes, and failures of a wide variety of payment arrangements. RESULTS: The results of this work have informed a definition of comprehensive primary care payment (CPCP) as well as a CPCP calculator. This quantitative methodology calculates a base rate and includes modifiers that recognize the importance of infrastructure and resources that have been found to be successful in innovative models. The modifiers also incorporate adjustments for chronic disease burden, social determinants of health, quality, and utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The calculator and CPCP methodology offer a potential roadmap for transitioning from volume to value and details how to calculate such an adjustable comprehensive payment. This has impact and interest for all levels of the health care system and is intended for use by practices of all types as well as health systems, employers, and payers.


Assuntos
Assistência Integral à Saúde/economia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Modelos Econômicos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
4.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 5(3): 317-25, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080781

RESUMO

PROBLEM: People of color suffer worse health outcomes than their White counterparts due, in part, to limited access to high-quality specialty care. PURPOSE: This article describes the events that led to the Bronx Health REACH coalition's decision to file a civil rights complaint with the New York State Office of the Attorney General alleging that three academic medical centers in New York City discriminated on the basis of payer status and race in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Hill-Burton Act, New York State regulations, and New York City Human Rights Law. KEY POINTS: Although the problem has not yet been resolved, the related community mobilization efforts have raised public awareness about the impact of disparate care, strengthened the coalition's commitment to achieve health equality, and garnered support among many city and state legislators. CONCLUSION: Community groups and professionals with relevant expertise can tackle complex systemic problems, but they must be prepared for a long and difficult fight.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Direitos Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Participação da Comunidade , Coalizão em Cuidados de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/etnologia , Grupos Minoritários , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Preconceito , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA