Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2023 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395935

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients with Germ cell tumours (GCT) are at risk of long-term toxicities due to multimodality therapy. It is debatable whether there is an impact on the quality of life(QoL) of GCT survivors. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in India, using the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire, to compare the QoL between GCT survivors(disease free > 2 years) and healthy matched controls. A multivariate regression model was used to identify factors affecting QoL. RESULTS: A total of 55 cases and 100 controls were recruited. Cases had a median age of 32 years (interquartile range, IQR 28-40 years), ECOG PS of 0-1(75%), advanced stage III (58%), chemotherapy (94%) and 66% were > 5 years from diagnosis. The median age of controls: 35 years (IQR 28-43 years). A statistically significant difference was seen for emotional (85.8 ± 14.2 vs 91.7 ± 10.4, p 0.005), social(83.0 ± 22.0 vs 95.2 ± 9.6, p < 0.001) and global scales (80.4 ± 21.1 vs 91.3 ± 9.7, p < 0.001). Cases had more nausea and vomiting(3.3 ± 7.4 vs 1.0 ± 3.9, p 0.015), pain(13.9 ± 13.9 vs 4.8 ± 9.8, p < 0.001), dyspnea(7.9 + 14.3 vs 2.7 ± 9.1, p 0.007), and appetite loss(6.7 ± 14.9 vs 1.9 ± 7.9, p 0.016) and greater financial toxicity(31.5 ± 32.3 vs 9.0 ± 16.3, p < 0.001). Adjusting for age, performance status, BMI, stage, chemotherapy, RPLND, recurrent disease, and time since diagnosis, no predictive variables were significant. CONCLUSION: There is a detrimental impact of history of GCT in long term survivors of GCT.

2.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 22(1): 44-51, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452863

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We used plerixafor in 'a risk adapted approach' for stem cell mobilization for multiple myeloma (MM) patients prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January, 2017 and December, 2019 105 consecutive patients of MM were recruited (Study Cohort). Patients received inj G-CSF 10 µg/kg in 2 divided doses for 5 days. Day 4 peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ count was used as a guide; if count was < 20 cells/µl, patients received plerixafor. For those with ≥ 20 cells/µl apheresis was commenced on day 5. We compared their outcome with 156 MM patients transplanted between 2012 and 2016 with G-CSF mobilized PB stem cells (Control Cohort). Primary end point was to collect ≥2.0  ×  106 CD34+ cells/kg (minimal harvest). Secondary end points were: no of apheresis sessions, percentage of patients with optimal stem cell harvest (≥4.0  ×  106 CD34+ cells/kg) and cost analysis. An intent to treat analysis was done. RESULT: 96.2% of patients achieved ≥ 2.0  ×  106 CD34+ cells/kg in the study cohort vs. 87.2% in the control cohort, P < .01. Mean apheresis sessions were 1.5 vs. 1.7 respectively, P < .014 . Optimal stem cell harvest was 29.5% vs. 16%,P = .23. Days for neutrophil engraftment (P < 0.025) and for IV antibiotics (P < .0017) were favorable for the study cohort. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio was $ 15.80/- and $ 10.56/- per 1% increase to achieve a minimal and optimal harvest. CONCLUSION: Plerixafor in this risk adapted strategy resulted in successful mobilization, decreased time to engraftment and was cost effective.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Benzilaminas/uso terapêutico , Ciclamos/uso terapêutico , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacologia , Benzilaminas/farmacologia , Ciclamos/farmacologia , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
3.
Ann Hematol ; 100(10): 2487-2500, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236495

RESUMO

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important parameter to predict outcome in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Two different approaches have been used for the assessment of MRD by multiparametric flow cytometry that include the "Leukemia Associated Aberrant Immunophenotype (LAIP)" and "Difference from Normal (DFN)" approach. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 539 samples obtained from 281 patients of which 258 were paired samples and the remaining 23 samples were from post-induction time point only, to explore the utility of baseline immunophenotype (IPT) for MRD assessment. Single-tube 10-color panel was used both at diagnosis and MRD time points. Out of 281 patients, 31.67% (n = 89) were positive and 68.32% (n = 192) were negative for MRD. Among 258 paired diagnostic and follow-up samples, baseline IPT was required in only 9.31% (24/258) cases which included cases with hematogone pattern and isolated dim to negative CD10 expression patterns. Comparison of baseline IPT with post-induction MRD positive samples showed a change in expression of at least one antigen in 94.04% cases. Although the immunophenotypic change in expression of various antigens is frequent in post-induction samples of B-ALL, it does not adversely impact the MRD assessment. In conclusion, the baseline IPT is required in less than 10% of B-ALL, specifically those with hematogone pattern and/or dim to negative expression of CD10. Hence, a combination of DFN and LAIP approach is recommended for reliable MRD assessment.


Assuntos
Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/diagnóstico , Antígenos CD/análise , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem , Neoplasia Residual/terapia , Neprilisina/análise , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 44(1): 81-91, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27506431

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel theranostic agent, 177Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: Thirty-one mCRPC patients with progressive disease despite second-line hormonal therapy and/or docetaxel chemotherapy were recruited for the study. All patients underwent diagnostic68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CCPET/CT, prior to inclusion for therapy. Included patients then underwent quarterly 177Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 therapy. Hematological, kidney function, liver function tests, and serum PSA levels were recorded before and after therapy at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 month intervals. Biochemical response was assessed with trend in serum PSA levels. Metabolic response was assessed by PERCIST 1 criteria. Clinical response was assessed by visual analogue score (VASmax) analgesic score (AS), Karanofsky performance status (KPS), and ttoxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 65.93 ± 9.77 years (range: 38-81 years). The mean activity administered in the 31 patients was 5069 ± 1845 MBq ranging from one to four cycles. There was a decline in the mean serum PSA levels from the baseline (baseline: 275 ng/mL, post 1st cycle therapy: 141.75 ng/mL). Based on biochemical response criteria 2/31, 20/31, 3/31, and 6/31 had complete response (CR), partial response(PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. Metabolic response revealed 2/6 patients with CR, and the remaining 3/6 patients with PR and 1/6 patients with SD. The mean VASmax score decreased from 7.5 to 3. The mean analgesic score decreased from 2.5 to 1.8 after therapy. The mean KPS score improved from 50.32 to 65.42 after therapies. The mean ECOG performance status improved from 2.54 to 1.78 after therapy. Two patients experienced grade I and grade II hemoglobin toxicity each. None of the patients experienced nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: 177Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 radionuclide therapy is a safe and effective approach in the treatment of mCRPC patients.


Assuntos
Dipeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 1 Anel/uso terapêutico , Compostos Organometálicos/uso terapêutico , Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/psicologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/radioterapia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Dipeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 1 Anel/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lutécio , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Compostos Organometálicos/efeitos adversos , Peptídeos/efeitos adversos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Nanomedicina Teranóstica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA