[Comprehensive health assessment of community-dwelling older people using mail method and its association with future transition to need for long-term care and dementia].

Objectives　We selected assessment items that can be used to evaluate the physical, mental, and social functions of community-dwelling older people comprehensively and easily, and examined whether these items could predict a future transition to the requirement for nursing care and dementia.Methods　We conducted a self-administered mail survey of 4,439 community-dwelling older people, who were not certified as requiring nursing care in 2011. The items for the survey were shortlisted out of a total of 54 items that were selected by referring to existing scales, and the evaluation items were determined by pass rate and factor analysis. The cut-off point of the total scores was estimated by ROC analysis using the certification of requiring long-term care (support level 1 or higher) and level of independence in the daily lives of older people with dementia (independence level I or higher) in 2014 as external criteria. The predictive validity was examined by binomial logistic regression analysis using the cut-off point of the total score and the score of the sub-domains as explanatory variables, and the requirement of nursing care and independence level of dementia in 2014 as objective variables.Results　A factor analysis of 1,810 subjects with no deficiencies in the 54 items identified 24 items in five domains (mental health, walking function, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), cognitive function, and social support). During the ROC analysis, the cut-off point of the total score was estimated to be 20/21 points (nursing care: AUC 0.75, sensitivity 0.77, specificity, 0.56; dementia: AUC 0.75; sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.55). The binomial logistic regression analysis showed that persons with a total score of less than 20 points in 2011 were significantly more likely to be certified as requiring nursing care (odds ratio 2.57, 95%CI 1.69-3.92, P<0.01) or show a decline in their independence level of dementia (odds ratio 3.12, 95%CI 1.83-5.32, P<0.01) in 2014. The scores of mental health, walking function, and IADL were significantly associated with certification of requiring nursing care, while walking function and cognitive function were significantly associated with dementia.Conclusion　We believe that the selected items in this study can successfully predict a transition to needing nursing care and dementia in the future. In the sub-domains, the results suggested an association with physical and mental function, as has been previously reported, but little association with social function.

Multiple impacts of an intergenerational program in Japan: Evidence from the Research on Productivity through Intergenerational Sympathy Project.

Compelling evidence supporting the benefits of social engagement in older adults has been increasingly discussed. However, knowledge regarding an intergenerational program is limited. Herein, we provide a targeted review of intergenerational programs by focusing on our novel interventional program, Research on Productivity through Intergenerational Sympathy. The Research on Productivity through Intergenerational Sympathy program is an intergenerational picture-book reading program launched in 2004. Participants were involved a 3-month intensive weekly training seminar comprising classes about book selection, reading techniques and basic knowledge of children's school life. Subsequently, they participated in group activities that involved playing a hand game, and reading picture books to children at kindergartens, elementary schools and public childcare centers, once every 1-2 weeks. The Research on Productivity through Intergenerational Sympathy program has shown improvement of physical and psychological functioning of older adults and healthy upbringing of children. Similarly, Experience Corps - designed to train and place volunteers in participating elementary schools for an academic year during which time they assist teachers - also showed positive effects for older adults' health status and the psychological/academic success of young children in the USA. Health promotion efforts for older adults must support social policy for the creation of meaningful service programs for older adults on a large social scale. As such, an intergenerational program based on the concept of social capital, defined as "features of social organization, such as trust, norms and networks, that can improve the efficacy of society by facilitating coordinated actions," is an effective and sustainable program for health promotion among older adults.

Development of the dementia assessment sheet for community-based integrated care system.

A series of our studies on the development of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System 21-items (DASC-21) were reviewed. Study 1: to examine the distribution of scores and internal reliability of DASC-21, trained nurses and researchers visited the homes of 1341 participants aged 65 years and older and living in the community. The nurses interviewed the participants and, when possible, their family members, to complete the DASC-21. Then, the Mini-Mental State Examination was carried out to select the participants of study 2. Study 2: to examine the concurrent and discriminant validity, experienced psychiatrists and psychologists, who were blind to the findings of study 1, visited the homes of 131 subjects who were selected from the participants of study 1 and completed the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Cronbach's coefficient alpha of the DASC-21 was 0.808-0.950. Scores of the DASC-21 significantly correlated with CDR total and box scores, Mini-Mental State Examination and Frontal Assessment Battery. In an analysis of variance, CDR had the main effect on the score of the DASC-21. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the DASC-21 had sufficient discriminatory ability between dementia (CDR1+) and non-dementia (CDR0 or CDR0.5; area under the curve = 0.804-0.895). When using a cut-off point of 30/31, sensitivity was 83.3-94.1% and specificity was 77.3-86.4%. The DASC-21 has sufficient reliability and validity as a tool to evaluate impairments in daily functioning and in cognitive functions, to detect dementia, and to assess the severity of dementia in the community.

[Reliability and validity of the simplified Japanese version of the WHO-Five Well-being Index (S-WHO-5-J)].

OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability and validity of the simplified Japanese version of the WHO-Five Well-Being Index (S-WHO-5-J), which reduces the original 6-point scale to a 4-point scale. METHODS: Subjects were selected from 4,439 community-dwelling elderly living in Tokyo. Their mean age +/- SD was 74.2 +/- 6.6 years, and 2,475 (55.8%) were female. We mailed a questionnaire to all potential subjects, and collected 3,068 (69.1%). We analyzed the data from 1,356 questionnaires that had no missing values for the following items: S-WHO-5-J, Geriatric Depression Scale short version (GDS-15), age, gender, persons living together, need of care, subjective rating of health, physical pain, subjective memory impairment, activities of daily living (TMIG Index of Competence), social support, housebound, and subjective feeling of economic affluence. The mean age +/- SD of the sample was 73.2 +/- 5.9 years, and the proportion of females was 51.1%. An additional analysis compared the number of missing values between a simplified version and an original version using the data of 2,034 subjects from another study. RESULTS: A factor analysis identified only one factor and showed high correlation coefficients between total score and items (0.79-0.87) and between all items (0.52-0.82) and a high Cronbach's alpha (0.889). The S-WHO-5-J was correlated to the GDS-15, to the item on mental health and to factors that affected mental health, physical health (subjective rating of health, physical pain, illness), physical function (walking, falling, nutritional status, oral health care), memory impairment, activities of daily living, and social function (housebound, interaction with others, social support). Additional analysis showed that there were fewer missing values for the S-WHO-5-J than for the WHO-5-J. CONCLUSION: The S-WHO-5-J is a reliable, valid, and convenient measure of mental health for large samples of community-dwelling elderly persons.

Brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in older Japanese: validation of the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

AIM: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), developed by Dr Nasreddine (Nasreddine et al. 2005), is a brief cognitive screening tool for detecting older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We examined the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the MoCA (MoCA-J) in older Japanese subjects. METHODS: Subjects were recruited from the outpatient memory clinic of Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital or community-based medical health check-ups in 2008. The MoCA-J, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the revised version of Hasegawa's Dementia Scale (HDS-R), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, and routine neuropsychological batteries were conducted on 96 older subjects. Mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) was found in 30 subjects and MCI in 30, with 36 normal controls. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha of MoCA-J as an index of internal consistency was 0.74. The test-retest reliability of MoCA, using intraclass correlation coefficient between the scores at baseline survey and follow-up survey 8 weeks later was 0.88 (P < 0.001). MoCA-J score was highly correlated with MMSE (r = 0.83, P < 0.001), HDS-R (r = 0.79, P < 0.001) and CDR (r = -0.79, P < 0.001) scores. The areas under receiver-operator curves (AUC) for predicting MCI and AD groups by the MoCA-J were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.90-1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI = 0.00-1.00), respectively. The corresponding values for MMSE and HDS-R were 0.85 (95% CI = 0.75-0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI = 0.00-1.00), and 0.86 (95% CI = 0.76-0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI = 0.00-1.00), respectively. Using a cut-off point of 25/26, the MoCA-J demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.0% and a specificity of 87.0% in screening MCI. CONCLUSION: The MoCA-J could be a useful cognitive test for screening MCI, and could be recommended in a primary clinical setting and for geriatric health screening in the community.