A microdosing framework for absolute bioavailability assessment of poorly soluble drugs: A case study on cold-labeled venetoclax, from chemistry to the clinic.

This work presents an end-to-end approach for assessing the absolute bioavailability of highly hydrophobic, poorly water-soluble compounds that exhibit high nonspecific binding using venetoclax as a model drug. The approach utilizes a stable labeled i.v. microdose and requires fewer resources compared with traditional approaches that use radioactive 14 C-labeled compounds. The stable labeled venetoclax and internal standard were synthesized, then an i.v. formulation was developed. In the clinical study, female subjects received a single oral dose of venetoclax 100 mg followed by a 100-µg i.v. dose of cold-labeled 13 C-venetoclax at the oral time of maximum concentration (Tmax ). The i.v. microdose was prepared as an extemporaneous, sterile compounded solution on the dosing day by pharmacists at the clinical site. Several measures were taken to ensure the sterility and safety of the i.v. preparation. A sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed to allow the detection of plasma levels from the i.v. microdose. Plasma samples were collected through 72 h, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Postdosing sample analysis demonstrated the consistency of the preparations and allowed the precise calculation of the pharmacokinetic parameters based on the actual injected dose. The absolute bioavailability of venetoclax was estimated at 5.4% under fasting conditions. Venetoclax extraction ratio was estimated to be 0.06 suggesting that the fraction transferred from the enterocytes into the liver is limiting venetoclax bioavailability. The proposed framework can be applied to other highly hydrophobic, poorly water-soluble compounds that exhibit high nonspecific binding to support the understanding of their absorption and disposition mechanisms and guide formulation development.

Assessment of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions of Elagolix, a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist.

Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist indicated for the management of endometriosis-associated pain and in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate indicated for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) in premenopausal women. Elagolix coadministered with estradiol/norethindrone acetate is in late-stage development for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Based on the in vitro profile of elagolix metabolism and disposition, 9 drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies evaluating the victim and perpetrator characteristics of elagolix were conducted in 144 healthy volunteers. As a victim of cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and transporter-mediated DDIs, elagolix area under the curve (AUC) increased by ∼2-fold following coadministration with ketoconazole and by ∼5- and ∼2-fold with single and multiple doses of rifampin, respectively. As a perpetrator, elagolix decreased midazolam AUC (90% confidence interval) by 54% (50%-59%) and increased digoxin AUC by 32% (23%-41%). Elagolix decreased rosuvastatin AUC by 40% (29%-50%). No clinically significant changes in exposure on coadministration with sertraline or fluconazole occurred. A elagolix 150-mg once-daily regimen should be limited to 6 months with strong CYP3A inhibitors and rifampin because of the potential increase in bone mineral density loss, as described in the drug label. A 200-mg twice-daily regimen is recommended for no more than 1 month with strong CYP3A inhibitors and not recommended with rifampin. Elagolix is contraindicated with strong organic anion transporter polypeptide B1 inhibitors (eg, cyclosporine and gemfibrozil). Consider increasing the doses of midazolam and rosuvastatin when coadministered with elagolix, and individualize therapy based on patient response. Clinical monitoring is recommended for P-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic window (eg, digoxin). Dose adjustments are not required for sertraline, fluconazole, bupropion (or any CYP2B6 substrate), or elagolix when coadministered.

Monte Carlo simulation analysis of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin pharmacodynamics against intensive care unit-isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The aim of the present study was to compare the potential of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin to achieve their requisite pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to simulate the PK/PD indices of the investigated antimicrobials. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was estimated at minimum inhibitory concentration values ranging from 0.03 to 32 µg/mL to define the PK/PD susceptibility breakpoints. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was computed using minimum inhibitory concentration data from the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit study. Analysis of the simulation results suggested the breakpoints of 4 µg/mL for ceftobiprole (500 mg/2 h t.i.d.), 0.25 µg/mL for dalbavancin (1000 mg), 0.12 µg/mL for daptomycin (4 mg/kg q.d. and 6 mg/kg q.d.) and tigecycline (50 mg b.i.d.), and 2 µg/mL for linezolid (600 mg b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1 g b.i.d. and 1.5 g b.i.d.). The estimated CFR were 100, 100, 70.6, 88.8, 96.5, 82.4, 89.4, and 98.3% for ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin (4 mg/kg/day), daptomycin (6 mg/kg/day), linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin (1 g b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1.5 g b.i.d.), respectively. In conclusion, ceftobiprole and dalbavancin have the highest probability of achieving their requisite PK/PD targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ICU settings. The susceptibility predictions suggested a reduction of the vancomycin breakpoint to 1 µg/mL.