Assessment of a New ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Clone (SP384) for the Identification of ROS1 Rearrangements in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: the ROSING Study.

INTRODUCTION: The ROS1 gene rearrangement has become an important biomarker in NSCLC. The College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology testing guidelines support the use of ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening test, followed by confirmation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a molecular test in all positive results. We have evaluated a novel anti-ROS1 IHC antibody (SP384) in a large multicenter series to obtain real-world data. METHODS: A total of 43 ROS1 FISH-positive and 193 ROS1 FISH-negative NSCLC samples were studied. All specimens were screened by using two antibodies (clone D4D6 from Cell Signaling Technology and clone SP384 from Ventana Medical Systems), and the different interpretation criteria were compared with break-apart FISH (Vysis). FISH-positive samples were also analyzed with next-generation sequencing (Oncomine Dx Target Test Panel, Thermo Fisher Scientific). RESULTS: An H-score of 150 or higher or the presence of at least 70% of tumor cells with an intensity of staining of 2+ or higher by the SP384 clone was the optimal cutoff value (both with 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity). The D4D6 clone showed similar results, with an H-score of at least 100 (91% sensitivity and 100% specificity). ROS1 expression in normal lung was more frequent with use of the SP384 clone (p < 0.0001). The ezrin gene (EZR)-ROS1 variant was associated with membranous staining and an isolated green signal FISH pattern (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The new SP384 ROS1 IHC clone showed excellent sensitivity without compromising specificity, so it is another excellent analytical option for the proposed testing algorithm.

Assessment of ALK status by FISH on 1000 Spanish non-small cell lung cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement selectively respond to ALK inhibitors. Thus, identification of ALK rearrangements has become a standard diagnostic test in advanced NSCLC patients. Our institution has been a referral center in Spain for ALK determination by Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and the FISH patterns of the ALK gene and to evaluate the clinical and pathological features of patients with ALK alterations. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, 1092 samples were evaluated for ALK using FISH technique (927 histological samples, 165 cytological samples). Correlation with available clinical-pathological information was assessed. RESULTS: ALK rearrangement was found in 35 patients (3.2%). Cytological samples (using either direct smears or cell blocks), were more frequently non-assessable than histological samples (69% versus 89%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Within the ALK-rearranged cases the majority were female, non-smokers, and stage IV. CONCLUSIONS: Although assessable in cytological samples, biopsies are preferred when available for ALK evaluation by FISH. The ALK translocation prevalence and the associated clinico-pathological features in Spanish NSCLC patients are similar to those previously reported.