Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Coron Artery Dis ; 32(2): 112-118, 2021 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33394691

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) often have multivessel coronary artery disease. We utilized the OPEN CTO study to evaluate patients who underwent single-vessel versus multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during CTO PCI. METHODS: Patients were considered to have undergone single-vessel CTO PCI if they underwent target-vessel only CTO PCI. Patients who underwent multivessel PCI during their index CTO PCI procedure were considered to have undergone multivessel PCI. The additional lesions treated in the multivessel group could be either a separate CTO lesion in a separate epicardial vessel or PCI attempt of any non-CTO stenosis during the same index procedure. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate predictors of technical success, in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and health status measures. RESULTS: Eighty hundred twenty-one patients underwent single-vessel CTO PCI and 179 (17.9%) underwent multivessel PCI during their CTO PCI procedure. Baseline comorbidities, index CTO lesion complexity, and successful crossing strategies used were similar between the two groups. Total procedural time (142.6 versus 115.9 minutes, P < 0.01) and contrast administered (293.8 versus 255.0 ml, P < 0.01) were increased in the multivessel CTO PCI group. Single-vessel versus multivessel PCI during these cases did not affect the likelihood of achieving technical success [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.75] nor the risk for MACCE (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.11). Quality of life (QOL) metrics were similar between the two groups at baseline and 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in technical success, in-hospital MACCE rates, or QOL metrics at 30-day follow-up for patients who underwent single-vessel versus multivessel PCI during CTO PCI.


Assuntos
Angioplastia/métodos , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 12(4): 323-331, 2019 02 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30711549

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the costs of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the association of complications during CTO PCI with costs and length of stay (LOS). BACKGROUND: CTO PCI generally requires more procedural resources and carries higher risk for complications than PCI of non-CTO vessels. The costs of CTO PCI using the hybrid approach have not been described, and no studies have examined the impact of complications on in-hospital costs and LOS in this population. METHODS: Costs were calculated for 964 patients in the 12-center OPEN-CTO (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures) registry using prospectively collected resource utilization and billing data. Multivariate models were developed to estimate the incremental costs and LOS associated with complications. Attributable costs and LOS were calculated by multiplying the independent cost of each event by its frequency in the population. RESULTS: Mean costs for the index hospitalization were $17,048 ± 9,904; 14.5% of patients experienced at least 1 complication. Patients with complications had higher mean hospital costs (by $8,603) and LOS (by 1.5 days) than patients without complications. Seven complications were independently associated with increased costs and 6 with LOS; clinically significant perforation and myocardial infarction had the greatest attributable cost per patient. Overall, complications accounted for $911 per patient in hospital costs (5.3% of the total costs) and 0.2 days of additional LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Complications have a significant impact on both LOS and in-hospital costs for patients undergoing CTO PCI. Methods to identify high-risk patients and develop strategies to prevent complications may reduce CTO PCI costs.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/economia , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Traumatismos Cardíacos/economia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/etiologia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
3.
JAMA Cardiol ; 3(11): 1041-1049, 2018 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267035

RESUMO

Importance: Same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with lower costs and preferred by patients. However, to our knowledge, contemporary patterns of SDD after elective PCI with respect to the incidence, hospital variation, trends, costs, and safety outcomes in the United States are unknown. Objective: To examine (1) the incidence and trends in SDD; (2) hospital variation in SDD; (3) the association between SDD and readmissions for bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or mortality at 30, 90, and 365 days after PCI; and (4) hospital costs of SDD and its drivers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cross-sectional cohort study included 672 470 patients enrolled in the nationally representative Premier Healthcare Database who underwent elective PCI from 493 hospitals between January 2006 and December 2015 with 1-year follow-up. Exposures: Same-day discharge, defined by identical dates of admission, PCI procedure, and discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death, bleeding requiring a blood transfusion, AKI and AMI at 30, 90, or 365 days after PCI, and costs from hospitals' perspective, inflated to 2016. Results: Among 672 470 elective PCIs, 221 997 patients (33.0%) were women, 30 711 (4.6%) were Hispanic, 51 961 (7.7%) were African American, and 491 823 (73.1%) were white. The adjusted rate of SDD was 3.5% (95% CI, 3.0%-4.0%), which increased from 0.4% in 2006 to 6.3% in 2015. We observed substantial hospital variation for SDD from 0% to 83% (median incidence rate ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 3.48-4.23), implying an average (median) 382% likelihood of SDD at one vs another hospital. Among SDD (vs non-SDD) patients, there was no higher risk of death, bleeding, AKI, or AMI at 30, 90, or 365 days. Same-day discharge was associated with a large cost savings of $5128 per procedure (95% CI, $5006-$5248), driven by reduced supply and room and boarding costs. A shift from existing SDD practices to match top-decile SDD hospitals could annually save $129 million in this sample and $577 million if adopted throughout the United States. However, residual confounding may be present, limiting the precision of the cost estimates. Conclusions and Relevance: Over 2006 to 2015, SDD after elective PCI was infrequent, with substantial hospital variation. Given the safety and large savings of more than $5000 per PCI associated with SDD, greater and more consistent use of SDD could markedly increase the overall value of PCI care.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 121(5): 558-563, 2018 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29289358

RESUMO

Stress testing is endorsed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Appropriate Use Criteria to identify appropriate candidates for Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). However, the relation between stress test risk classification and health status after CTO PCI is not known. We studied 449 patients in the 12-center OPEN CTO registry who underwent stress testing before successful CTO PCI, comparing outcomes of patients with low-risk (LR) versus intermediate to high-risk (IHR) findings. Health status was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency (SAQ AF), Quality of Life (SAQ QoL), and Summary Scores (SAQ SS). Stress tests were LR in 40 (8.9%) and IHR in 409 (91.1%) patients. There were greater improvements on the SAQ AF (LR vs IHR 14.2 ± 2.7 vs 23.3 ± 1.3 points, p <0.001) and SAQ SS (LR vs IHR 20.8 ± 2.3 vs 25.4 ± 1.1 points, p = 0.03) in patients with IHR findings, but there was no difference between groups on the SAQ QoL domain (LR vs IHR 24.8 ± 3.4 vs 27.3 ± 1.6 points, p = 0.42). We observed large health status improvements after CTO PCI in both the LR and IHR groups, with the greatest reduction in angina among those with IHR stress tests. Although patients with higher risk studies may experience greater reduction in angina symptoms, on average, patients with LR stress tests also experienced large improvements in symptoms after CTO PCI, suggesting patients with refractory symptoms should be considered appropriate candidates for CTO PCI regardless of stress test findings.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Oclusão Coronária/classificação , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Teste de Esforço , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Clin Cardiol ; 40(8): 521-527, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28300284

RESUMO

Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce risk of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but require dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for a longer term than bare-metal stents (BMS). Few studies have examined clinical predictors of DES vs BMS, and variability in provider selection between DES and BMS in clinical practice has not been well described. These insights can inform our understanding of current practice and may identify opportunities to improve decision-making stent selection decinsion-making. In a multicenter registry, 3295 consecutive patients underwent PCI by 158 interventional cardiologists across 10 US sites. Eighty percent of patients with treated with DES. Using hierarchical regression, diabetes mellitus, multivessel disease, health insurance, and white race were independently associated with greater DES use, whereas increasing age, history of hypertension, anticipated surgery, use of warfarin, lower hemoglobin, prior history of bleeding, and treatment of right coronary and left circumflex artery lesions as compared with PCI of left anterior descending artery were associated with lower likelihood of receiving DES. Adjusted rates of DES use across providers varied from 52.3% to 94.6%, and adjusted median odds ratio for DES selection was 1.69. DES selection appeared to reflect physicians' attempts to balance benefits of DES against risks of prolonged DAPT. Nevertheless, marked residual variability in DES selection across providers persisted after adjusting for predictors of restenosis, bleeding, and other factors. Further studies are needed to better understand drivers of this variability and identify the impact of patient and provider preferences on stent selection at the time of PCI.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Stents Farmacológicos , Metais , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Stents , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Comorbidade , Reestenose Coronária/etiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Seleção de Pacientes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Desenho de Prótese , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
6.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 9(22): 2343-2352, 2016 11 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27884360

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). BACKGROUND: Recent trials have reported lower rates of target lesion revascularization with DCB angioplasty versus standard PTA. However, the cost-effectiveness of DCB angioplasty is unknown. METHODS: A prospective economic study was performed alongside the IN.PACT SFA II (IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery [SFA] and Proximal Popliteal Artery [PPA]) trial, which randomized 181 patients with femoropopliteal disease to the IN.PACT DCB versus standard PTA. Resource use data were collected over 2-year follow-up, and costs were assigned using resource-based accounting and billing data. Health utilities were assessed using the EuroQol 5-dimensions questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness was assessed as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained using a decision-analytic model on the basis of empirical data from the trial assuming identical long-term mortality. RESULTS: Initial costs were $1,129 per patient higher with DCB angioplasty than standard PTA, driven by higher costs for the DCB itself. Between discharge and 24 months, target limb-related costs were $1,212 per patient lower with DCB angioplasty such that discounted 2-year costs were similar for the 2 groups ($11,277 vs. $11,359, p = 0.97), whereas QALYs tended to be greater among patients treated with DCBs (1.53 ± 0.44 vs. 1.47 ± 0.42, p = 0.40). The probability that DCB angioplasty is cost-effective compared with standard PTA was 70% using a threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained and 79% at a threshold of $150,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with femoropopliteal disease, DCB angioplasty is associated with better 2-year outcomes and similar target limb-related costs compared with standard PTA. Formal cost-effectiveness analysis on the basis of these results suggests that use of the DCB angioplasty is likely to be economically attractive.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/economia , Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/economia , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/economia , Artéria Femoral , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Artéria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/economia , Idoso , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Constrição Patológica , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Custos de Medicamentos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
7.
Arch Intern Med ; 172(15): 1145-52, 2012 Aug 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22777536

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Benefits of drug-eluting stents (DES) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are greatest in those at the highest risk of target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Drug-eluting stents cost more than bare-metal stents (BMS) and necessitate prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which increases costs, bleeding risk, and risk of complications if DAPT is prematurely discontinued. Our objective was to assess whether DES are preferentially used in patients with higher predicted TVR risk and to estimate if lower use of DES in low-TVR-risk patients would be more cost-effective than the existing DES use pattern. METHODS: We analyzed more than 1.5 million PCI procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI registry from 2004 through 2010 and estimated 1-year TVR risk with BMS using a validated model. We examined the association between TVR risk and DES use and the cost-effectiveness of lower DES use in low-TVR-risk patients (50% less DES use among patients with <10% TVR risk) compared with existing DES use. RESULTS: There was marked variation in physicians' use of DES (range 2%-100%). Use of DES was high across all predicted TVR risk categories (73.9% in TVR risk <10%; 78.0% in TVR risk 10%-20%; and 83.2% in TVR risk >20%), with a modest relationship between TVR risk and DES use (relative risk, 1.005 per 1% increase in TVR risk [95% CI, 1.005-1.006]). Reducing DES use by 50% in low-TVR-risk patients was projected to lower US health care costs by $205 million per year while increasing the overall TVR event rate by 0.5% (95% CI, 0.49%-0.51%) in absolute terms. CONCLUSIONS: Use of DES in the United States varies widely among physicians, with only a modest correlation to patients' risk of restenosis. Less DES use among patients with low risk of restenosis has the potential for significant cost savings for the US health care system while minimally increasing restenosis events.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Reestenose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Stents Farmacológicos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Reestenose Coronária/etiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Stents Farmacológicos/efeitos adversos , Stents Farmacológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
8.
Am J Cardiol ; 108(7): 949-54, 2011 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21784387

RESUMO

New-onset, hospital-acquired anemia (HAA) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is independently associated with poor outcomes. The patterns of recovery from HAA after AMI and their association with mortality and health status are unknown. In the prospective 24-center Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in acute myocardial infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH) registry, we identified 530 patients with AMI and HAA (defined as normal hemoglobin at admission with the development of anemia by discharge) who had a repeat, protocol-driven hemoglobin measurement at 1 month after discharge. The 1-month measures were used to define persistent (persistent anemia) and transient (anemia resolved) HAA. The patients' health status was assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months after AMI using the Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary, and the health status of patients with persistent and transient HAA was compared using multivariate repeated measures regression analysis. Mortality was compared using the log-rank test and proportional hazards regression analysis. Overall, 165 patients (31%) developed persistent HAA. The adjusted mean Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary scores at the follow-up visit were significantly lower in those with persistent HAA than in those with transient HAA (-2.0 points, 95% confidence interval -3.6 to -0.3; p = 0.02). During a median follow-up of 36 months, the crude mortality (13% vs 5%, p = 0.002) and multivariate-adjusted mortality (hazard ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 4.21, p = 0.04) was greater in patients with persistent HAA. In conclusion, HAA persists 1 month after discharge in nearly 1 of 3 patients and is associated with worse health status and greater mortality. Additional investigation is needed to understand whether HAA prevention, recognition, and treatment, particularly among those with persistent HAA, will improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Anemia/epidemiologia , Convalescença , Nível de Saúde , Registros Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Anemia/sangue , Anemia/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA