Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(6): 102512, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442842

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the most life-threatening pathologies characterized by sudden cardiac death and is among the leading causes of mortality in the developed world. AIMS: This study investigates the demographic, socio-economic, and healthcare access disparities in the US among patients with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective original research study conducted using the BRFSS (Behavioural risk factor surveillance system) database of CDC (Centers for disease control and prevention).Data was extracted from the BRFSS on 3rd January 2024 to identify patients with MI in the year 2021 and multivariate models were used to assess the relationship between factors such as age, gender, income levels, and education in patients with myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Individuals in the age group of 65 years or older constituted the highest percentage of MI cases at 66.33 % (OR, 16.66; 95 % CI, 10.27-27.02; p-value <0.0001).Males showed a higher prevalence of MI, accounting for 61.19 % of cases, and females demonstrated lower susceptibility (OR, 0.46; 95 % CI, 0.43-0.50; p-value <0.0001).High school graduates (Grade 12 or GED) exhibited the highest incidence at 32.08 % (OR, 1.44; 95 % CI, 0.81-2.56; p-value 0.2084). Retirees accounted for the highest incidence at 56.06 %, with significantly increased odds compared to those employed for wages (OR, 1.93; 95 % CI, 1.71-2.19; p-value <0.0001).The analysis of income levels indicated the highest MI incidence in the $25,000 <= Income < $35,000 group (17.31 % of cases). CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is necessary to further disentangle the interaction between MI and factors such as age, gender, education level, race, employment status, and income level, and as the findings of this study suggest, retired individuals and individuals from lower-income groups indicate a disparity in access to timely treatment regarding MI. Thus, the determination of such discrepancies needs to be addressed regarding how such factors affect access to timely healthcare, especially in matters of widely prevalent diseases such as MI.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Infarto do Miocárdio , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/etnologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; : 102529, 2024 Mar 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503361

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the most life-threatening pathologies characterized by sudden cardiac death and is among the leading causes of mortality in the developed world. AIMS: This study investigates the demographic, socio-economic, and healthcare access disparities in the US among patients with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective original research study conducted using the BRFSS (Behavioural risk factor surveillance system) database of CDC (Centers for disease control and prevention).Data was extracted from the BRFSS on 3rd January 2024 to identify patients with MI in the year 2021 and multivariate models were used to assess the relationship between factors such as age, gender, income levels, and education in patients with myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Individuals in the age group of 65 years or older constituted the highest percentage of MI cases at 66.33% (OR, 16.66; 95% CI, 10.27-27.02; p-value <0.0001).Males showed a higher prevalence of MI, accounting for 61.19% of cases, and females demonstrated lower susceptibility (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.43-0.50; p-value <0.0001).High school graduates (Grade 12 or GED) exhibited the highest incidence at 32.08% (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.81-2.56; p-value 0.2084). Retirees accounted for the highest incidence at 56.06%, with significantly increased odds compared to those employed for wages (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.71-2.19; p-value <0.0001).The analysis of income levels indicated the highest MI incidence in the $25,000 <= Income < $35,000 group (17.31% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is necessary to further disentangle the interaction between MI and factors such as age, gender, education level, race, employment status, and income level, and as the findings of this study suggest, retired individuals and individuals from lower-income groups indicate a disparity in access to timely treatment regarding MI. Thus, the determination of such discrepancies needs to be addressed regarding how such factors affect access to timely healthcare, especially in matters of widely prevalent diseases such as MI.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA