Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 48(1): 50-58, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30391221

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence, correlates, and influences of male partner reproductive coercion (RC) and intimate partner violence (IPV) on unintended pregnancy (UIP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using population-based data. SETTING: Six participating states contributed data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained for 20,252 women who gave birth between 2012 and 2015 and completed the PRAMS survey within 9 months of giving birth. METHODS: Weighted descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the influence of RC and IPV on odds of UIP. RESULTS: Approximately 2.7% (n = 600) of participants reported physical IPV, and 1.1% (n = 285) reported RC. Participants less than 30 years of age, with low socioeconomic status, who were single and of Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity were at significantly increased risk of IPV. With the exception of Hispanic race/ethnicity, these sociodemographic characteristics were also associated with an increased risk for RC. Participants who experienced IPV had a nearly eightfold increased risk of RC (adjusted odds ratio = 7.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.68, 13.59]) than their nonabused counterparts. In univariate models, RC, IPV, or RC with IPV were significantly associated with increased odds of UIP (odds ratio [OR] = 2.18, 95% CI [1.38, 3.44]; OR = 2.36, 95% CI [1.75, 3.19]; OR = 3.55, 95% CI [1.56, 8.06], respectively); however, results were nonsignificant after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSION: In this population-based sample, we confirmed that there were links among IPV, RC, and UIP, all factors associated with poor maternal and infant outcomes. Screening for IPV and RC is an important step toward reducing rates of UIP.


Assuntos
Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Gravidez não Planejada/psicologia , Maus-Tratos Conjugais , Adulto , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/métodos , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/prevenção & controle , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/psicologia , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Gravidez , Prevalência , Comportamento Reprodutivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Parceiros Sexuais/psicologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/etnologia , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/prevenção & controle , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/psicologia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA