Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.

The patient-provider relationship is a key driver of patient satisfaction as it relates to overall healthcare experience. We surveyed patients undergoing radiation therapy to determine what they consider to be the most valued qualities in their interactions with the healthcare team. An ethics-approved 35-item patient satisfaction survey was developed in-house to gain insights on patients' perception of their relationship with the healthcare team throughout their cancer journey. There were 199 completed survey, median age 68 years, 54% women and 45% men. Almost all (95%) "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that their physicians had been sensitive and compassionate. Over 90% felt that they received adequate explanations about their treatment, and had their questions answered. The vast majority (93%) felt included in the decision-making process. Patients reported the 5 most highly rated qualities among their healthcare providers (HCPs) as knowledge, kindness, honesty, good communication, and a cheerful attitude. Overall satisfaction was high but areas for improvement were identified including being offered future appointments for further discussion, more information about clinical trials, other treatments, and community resources. Patients noted their HCPs tended to focus on the physical and emotional needs of patients, but spiritual and cultural needs were rarely addressed. Patients receiving radiotherapy reported high rates of satisfaction across many aspects of their care. These findings also reinforce the different aspects of holistic care that can be improved, and serve as a reminder to clinicians that patients perceive their role as more than just that of a medical expert.

Pain assessment during conscious sedation for cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: This observational study set out to evaluate the effectiveness of conscious sedation anesthesia for pain control during high-dose-rate (hdr) brachytherapy using a ring-and-tandem applicator system for patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: At the time of initiation of the hdr cervical cancer brachytherapy program at our institution, patients received a detailed symptom assessment during the procedures. Brachytherapy was carried out using a Smit sleeve, together with a ring-and-tandem applicator. Midazolam and an opioid-hydromorphone, morphine, or fentanyl-were the main agents used to achieve conscious sedation. RESULTS: From January 2009 to October 2010, 20 patients (median age: 45 years) underwent 57 procedures. All patients received chemoradiation with curative intent. The median duration of the procedures was 1.4 hours, and no significant cardiovascular events were noted. The total dose of intravenous midazolam used ranged from 0.5 mg to 8.5 mg (median: 2.5 mg). The total dose of intravenous morphine equivalent used ranged from 2.5 mg to 60 mg (median: 8 mg). The mean and median pain scores during the procedures were 1.4 and 1.1 respectively. Brief moments of moderate to severe incidental pain were noted at the time of certain events during the procedure-specifically during insertion of the ring-and-tandem applicator. The maximal pain score during the entire procedure ranged from 0 to 10 (median: 4.7). The period of recovery from conscious sedation was relatively brief (median discharge time: 1 hour). CONCLUSIONS: We were able to demonstrate that patients undergoing hdr brachytherapy for cervical cancer can achieve good pain control with conscious sedation.

A cost-outcome analysis of adjuvant postmastectomy locoregional radiotherapy in premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To calculate cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios for adjuvant postmastectomy locoregional radiotherapy in premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients and to place these ratios in the context of generally accepted medical expenditures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A spreadsheet-based activity costing model using 1997 Canadian (cdn) capital, operating, and administrative costs has been used to identify, from the institutional perspective, the incremental cost of adding radiotherapy to surgery and chemotherapy for this group of patients. Outcome data were derived from two recently published clinical trials and were converted to discounted incremental life years and quality-adjusted life years gained. Recommended health economics principles were employed in the quantification of both costs and outcomes, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. Three referenced publications provide a context within which to evaluate the calculated cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios. RESULTS: The incremental cost of adjuvant radiotherapy for this group of patients is calculated to be approximately $7,000cdn in 1997 Canadian dollars and in the Canadian socialized health-care environment. Based on published work the discounted incremental outcome benefit is calculated to be 0.5 life years or 0.45 quality-adjusted life years at ten years. Thus, cost effectiveness and cost-utility ratios are estimated to be $14,000cdn and $15,600cdn, respectively. CONCLUSION: Within the context of generally accepted medical expenditures, adjuvant postmastectomy locoregional radiotherapy for premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients would be regarded as a cost-effective treatment strategy.