Simplifying Arterial Coupling in Microsurgery-A Preclinical Assessment of an Everter Device to Aid with Arterial Anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: A novel arterial everter device was engineered to simplify microvascular coupling of arteries by reliably securing the stiff, muscular wall of arteries over coupler pins. We compare microvascular coupling with the everter device to manual suturing for arterial anastomoses in a live large animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this preliminary study, bilateral external femoral arteries of five male swine were exposed and sharply divided. Arteries were anastomosed using either interrupted sutures (n = 5) or the everter device and Synovis Coupler (n = 5). The efficiency in engaging coupler pins, the time taken to perform the anastomosis, and vessel patency immediately post-op and at 1-week postanastomosis were evaluated. Vessel wall injury and luminal stenosis were compared between groups using histomorphometric analyses. RESULTS: On an average, 80% of coupler pins engaged the vessel walls after a single pass of the everter. The average time to perform the anastomosis was significantly less when using the everter/coupler compared with manual suturing (6:35 minutes versus 25:09 minutes, p < 0.001). Immediately post-op, 100% patency was observed in both groups. At 1 week post-op, four of five (80%) of coupled arteries and all five (100%) of hand-sewn arteries were patent. The degree of arterial wall injury, neointimal formation, and luminal stenosis for patent arteries were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Successful arterial anastomoses using the everter device with the Synovis Coupler was easier and significantly more efficient when compared with a standard hand-sewn technique. Both techniques had acceptable patency rates and similar effects on the vessel wall and intima.

The Early Years of Practice: An Assessment of Operative Efficiency and Cost of Free Flap and Implant Breast Reconstruction at an Academic Institution.

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term costs, and financial implications of improvements in operative efficiency of free flap and implant-based breast reconstruction within an academic practice. Methods The billing records of 162 patients who underwent postmastectomy implant-based or free flap breast reconstruction by two newly hired microsurgeons at an academic institution during the 2011, 2012, and 2013 fiscal years were reviewed. Actual data on professional revenue, relative value units (RVUs), and facility costs for the first stage of reconstruction as well as costs of postoperative complications were assessed. Results Free flaps consistently generated more revenue and RVUs than implants (p < 0.001). Rates of major complications and associated costs were greater for free flaps during the first 2 years of practice; however, by the 3rd year rates were similar between free flaps and implants (14.3 vs. 18.2%, p = 0.72). There was a 26% reduction in free flap operative time in 2013 as compared with 2011. Operative efficiency (hourly RVU) of first stage procedures increased each year for both modalities. At the completion of reconstruction, flaps and implants had comparable hourly reimbursement ($1,053 vs. $947, p = 0.72) and hourly RVU (22 vs. 29, p = 0.06). Conclusions Contrary to perceptions that free flap breast reconstructions are financially inefficient for the surgeon, we have found that these complex reconstructive procedures are profitable. Even in the early years of practice, hourly reimbursements from completed flap reconstructions are similar to reimbursements received from similar staged implant reconstructions.

Comprehensive breast reconstruction in an academic surgical practice: an evaluation of the financial impact.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the financial implications of providing all forms of breast reconstruction at a single academic institution with insurance as the primary mode of reimbursement. METHODS: Billing records of 152 patients who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction offered at the University of Michigan for the 2012 fiscal year were reviewed. Professional and facility revenue, cost, and earnings for the first stage of reconstruction were calculated by applying actual collections and charges. Similar financial data were compiled for a subset of 49 patients who went on to complete reconstruction. RESULTS: The professional revenue and expenses allocated to breast reconstruction were $647,437 and $591,184, respectively (8.7 percent margin). Health care system facility revenue and costs were $2,762,797 and $2,773,131, respectively (-0.4 percent margin). Physician reimbursement by surgical time was highest for delayed tissue expander placement ($3505 per operating room hour). Abdominal free flap reconstructions resulted in greater professional revenue for the first stage of reconstruction ($7801 versus $2961) and for completed reconstructions ($14,943 versus $7703) relative to implant reconstructions. The facility also did better fiscally after the first stage of abdominally based reconstruction compared with implant reconstructions (10 percent versus -10.4 percent margin). CONCLUSIONS: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction for this academic surgical practice remains fiscally profitable. Implant-based reconstruction compared with abdominal flap reconstruction produces greater revenue per operative hour but ultimately generates less total revenue and results in financial losses for the facility. Abdominally based perforator flap reconstruction reimbursed through standard insurance plans can be financially advantageous for the academic surgical practice and health care system.