Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 18(7): 771-777, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32967598

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Drains are used routinely in many centers at the conclusion of kidney transplant, despite a paucity of evidence to guide practice in kidney transplant. Studies have not shown benefit from prophylactic drain placement following other major abdominal and vascular operations, and usage is consequently declining. Our aim was to understand practice patterns and rationale for behavior in drain placement and management in kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an online survey of surgeons who routinely perform kidney transplants across Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: The response rate was 66% (43/66). Of respondents, 61% reported routine drain insertion, whereas 21% seldom inserted drains. Concerns about bleeding and anticoagulation (63%) and routine practice (58%) were the dominant reasons for drain insertion. The factors selected as most significant in determining drain removal were both volume and time (44%) and volume alone (33%). A volume of < 50 mL/day (51%) was the most commonly reported threshold for removal. The postoperative period of days 3 to 5 was the most commonly selected time point for drain removal (63%). Seventy-four percent of respondents would consider enrolling their patients in a randomized controlled trial to determine the benefits and harms of drain insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Although drain insertion is a common practice, transplant surgeons in Australia and New Zealand reported sufficient uncertainty concerning the potential benefits and harms to warrant design and conduct of a randomized controlled trial.


Assuntos
Drenagem/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Transplante de Rim/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Austrália , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/instrumentação , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Nova Zelândia , Segurança do Paciente , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 110(4): 445-50, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24962104

RESUMO

An inadequate volume of future liver remnant (FLR) remains an absolute contraindication to liver resection. FLR measurement correlates with surgical outcome and is fundamental to identify those patients that may benefit from portal vein embolization (PVE) and to assess the liver volume change following embolization. In order to minimize the risk of postoperative liver failure, preoperative analysis of FLR must be included in the surgical planning of every major liver resection. The aims of this review are to describe the use of preoperative volumetric analysis in modern liver surgery and indications for PVE.


Assuntos
Hepatectomia , Fígado/anatomia & histologia , Fígado/fisiopatologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Embolização Terapêutica , Humanos , Veia Porta , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(3): 749-56, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22933130

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers of patients with poor prognosis upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are at high risk of experiencing psychological distress and carer burden. The early postoperative period is a time of high patient care needs and transition of care, with carers new to the caring role. This study aimed to explore the experiences of family caregivers of people diagnosed with upper GI cancer after surgical intervention to (1) identify their unmet supportive care needs and (2) investigate how family caregivers perceive their role during this time. METHODS: Family caregivers of newly diagnosed postsurgical upper GI cancer patients were recruited. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted at 3 weeks and 3 months post-surgery. Analysis involved a constant comparative approach. Sampling was discontinued when information redundancy was achieved. Fifteen family caregivers participated in the first interview and eight agreed to a second interview. RESULTS: Family caregivers reported significant information and support needs. Family caregiver distress was exacerbated by a lack of patient care knowledge. Access to support was limited by caregivers' lack of understanding of the health system. Family caregivers view their role as part of their family responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insight into the supportive care needs of family caregivers of upper GI cancer patients and the impact of unmet need on the emotional well-being of family caregivers. These results will inform future supportive care service development and intervention research aimed at reducing unmet supportive care needs and psychological distress of family caregivers of patients with poor prognosis upper GI cancer.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Cuidadores/psicologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/terapia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Apoio Social , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Transplantation ; 91(10): 1110-3, 2011 May 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21389903

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Given the disparity between static supply and increasing demand for organs, the greatest challenge is broadening access to the benefits of kidney transplantation. Organs from small deceased pediatric donors are a potentially underused resource. These may be transplanted as en bloc kidney transplants (EBKTs) to one recipient or as single kidney transplants (SKTs) to two recipients, albeit with an increased risk of graft failure. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified data on transplant outcomes for recipients of organs from small pediatric deceased donors. A decision analysis model was constructed to allow the outcome in life years (LY) to be predicted for patients with end-stage kidney disease on the transplant waiting list depending on whether they received EBKT or SKT. RESULTS: At all recipient ages, the projected LY of both recipients of an SKT was greater than the projected LY of an EBKT recipient. The net estimated gain in LY associated with the SKT technique was greatest for recipients aged 20 to 39 years (14.3 years) and lowest for recipients aged 60 to 74 years (3.36 years). Only for recipients of organs from donors weighing less than 10 kg, there was an estimated net loss of LY associated with the SKT technique across all recipient age groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is a greater gain in overall life expectancy using SKTs, because this technique yields two recipients per donor, which more than compensates for the increased risk of graft failure.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Seleção do Doador , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Rim/anatomia & histologia , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Adulto , Idoso , Peso Corporal , Pré-Escolar , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Expectativa de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Listas de Espera , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA