Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Arch. pediatr. Urug ; 93(1): e202, jun. 2022. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1383636

RESUMO

Introducción: las anomalías congénitas (AC) son un problema de salud pública con impacto en la infancia, la mortalidad infantil (MI) y la discapacidad. En Uruguay, así como en otros países desarrollados, las AC y la prematuridad son las principales causas de MI. Objetivos: el objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar las anomalías más frecuentes en el país entre 2011 y 2014, y evaluar los factores de riesgo. Material y método: los datos se obtuvieron del Registro Nacional de Defectos Congénitos y Enfermedades Raras y Estadísticas Vitales del Ministerio de Salud Pública. Resultados: se determinó que prácticamente la mitad de los casos fueron: cardiopatías congénitas, síndrome de Down y defectos del tubo neural (anencefalia, encefalocele y mielomeningocele), representando 0,42% (812/191.820) y 2,85% (38/1334) de los nacidos vivos (NV) y de los óbitos fetales respectivamente. Las prevalencias por 10.000 NV y OF fueron: 38,52 y 149,93 para cardiopatías congénitas; 3,6 y 7,5 para síndrome de Down; 2,1 y 127,4 para defectos del tubo neural. La edad materna avanzada fue el principal factor de riesgo de síndrome de Down. Los factores de riesgo observados en las tres anomalías seleccionadas fueron: prematurez, depresión neonatal y bajo peso al nacer. Conclusiones: las anomalías congénitas en general y las seleccionadas en este trabajo en particular, constituyen una causa relevante de morbimortalidad en el período neonatal e infantil, plausibles de prevención. El diagnóstico temprano es fundamental para planificar servicios de salud especializados. Los resultados aquí presentados se pueden utilizar como línea de base para medir el impacto de las acciones de salud a nivel nacional.


Introduction: congenital anomalies (CA) are a public health problem with an impact on childhood, infant mortality (IM) and disability. In Uruguay, as well as in other developed countries, CA and prematurity are the main causes of IM. Objectives: analyze the most frequent anomalies in the country in 2011-2014 and evaluate risk factors. Material and methods: the data were obtained from the National Record of Congenital Defects and Rare Diseases and health statistics from the Ministry of Public Health. Results: it was determined that practically half of the cases were: congenital heart disease, Down syndrome and Neural Tube Defects (anencephaly, encephalocele and myelomeningocele), accounting for 0.42% (812/191,820) and 2.85% (38/1334) of live births and stillbirths respectively. The prevalence per 10,000 NV and stillbirths were: 38.52 and 149.93 for Congenital Heart Disease; 3.6 and 7.5 for Down Syndrome; 2.1 and 127.4 for neural tube defects. Advanced maternal age was the main risk factor for Down syndrome. The risk factors observed in the three selected anomalies were: prematurity, neonatal depression and low birth weight. Conclusions: congenital anomalies in general, and those selected in this study in particular, are a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns and infants, likely to be prevented. Early diagnosis is essential for planning specialized health services. The results presented in the present paper can be used as a baseline to measure the impact of health actions at national level.


Introdução: as anomalias congênitas (AC) são um problema de saúde pública com impacto na infância, na mortalidade infantil (MI) e na deficiência. No Uruguai, assim como em outros países desenvolvidos as AC e prematuridade são as principais causas de MI. Objetivos: analisar as anomalias mais frequentes no país, entre 2011-2014 e avaliar os fatores de risco. Material e métodos: os dados foram obtidos do Registro Nacional de Defeitos Congênitos e Doenças Raras e estatísticas vitais do Ministério da Saúde Pública. Resultados: determinou-se que praticamente a metade dos casos eram: cardiopatias congênitas, Síndrome de Down e Defeitos do tubo neural (anencefalia, encefalocele e mielomeningocele), representando 0,42% (812/191.820) e 2,85% (38/1334) de nascidos vivos-NV e natimortos, respectivamente. As prevalências por 10.000 NV e natimortos foram: 38,52 e 149,93 para Cardiopatia Congênita; 3,6 e 7,5 para Síndrome de Down; 2,1 e 127,4 para defeitos do tubo neural. A idade materna avançada foi o principal fator de risco para a síndrome de Down. Os fatores de risco observados nas três anomalias selecionadas foram: prematuridade, depressão neonatal e baixo peso ao nascer. Conclusões: as anomalias congênitas em geral e as selecionadas neste estudo em particular, constituem causa relevante de morbimortalidade no período neonatal e infantil, possível de ser prevenida. O diagnóstico precoce é fundamental para o planejamento de serviços de saúde especializados. Os resultados aqui apresentados podem ser usados como base para medir o impacto das ações de saúde realizadas a nível nacional.


Assuntos
Humanos , Síndrome de Down/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/epidemiologia , Uruguai/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco , Meningomielocele/epidemiologia , Encefalocele/epidemiologia , Anencefalia/epidemiologia
2.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 44(3): 660-668, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31984499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) is a disorder caused by alterations in embryo-fetal development due to prenatal alcohol exposure. It is estimated that between 0.5 and 2 per 1,000 individuals are born with FAS every year. In Brazil, there are few studies addressing the extent of the problem of FAS/fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD); these studies are confined to limited geographic areas. Therefore, we decided to perform a health needs assessment for FAS/FASD in Brazil. METHODS: To estimate the prevalence of FAS and FASD in Brazil, we used information from the literature, which estimates between 0.5 and 2/1,000 births per year for FAS and 10 to 50/1,000 for FASD. RESULTS: We estimated that approximately 1,500 to 6,000 children are born with FAS every year. Considering the whole population, the prevalence would be 95,377 to 380,000 affected people. However, when we consider FASD as a whole, we estimate that between 1,900,000 and 9,500,000 Brazilians might suffer the more severe consequences of alcohol exposure during pregnancy and be living with FASD. CONCLUSION: The results of the current study indicate that FAS and FASD are prevalent disorders in Brazil, and more policies targeting alcohol intake during pregnancy must be developed.


Assuntos
Transtornos do Espectro Alcoólico Fetal/epidemiologia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Bebidas Alcoólicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Brasil/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
J Community Genet ; 5(2): 147-55, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23990401

RESUMO

Recent economic improvement in Brazil has been reflected in better maternal-child health indicators, with decreases in infant and perinatal mortality. However, under-five mortality due to congenital disorders remained unchanged, and congenital disorders have become the second leading cause of infant mortality. In the present study, we used the PHG Foundation Health Needs Assessment (HNA) Toolkit with the objective of first assessing the burden of disease caused by neural tube defects (NTDs) in Brazil and the impact of interventions already put in place to address the burden, and second to evaluate and prioritize further interventions and policies required for its prevention and treatment. The results from these two components of the HNA process are described in this paper. The published literature was reviewed to identify studies of NTDs (prevalence; morbidity; prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal mortality; treatment or prevention). Data on indicators of maternal and child health were obtained directly from the Brazilian Ministry of Health, through the online Live Births Information System (SINASC) and from the Mortality Information System (SIM). Descriptive analyses included reports of the rates of NTD in liveborns, fetal, and infant deaths. Differences between folic acid flour pre-fortification (2001-2004) and post-fortification (2006-2010) periods were expressed as prevalence rate ratios. Around 20 % of fetal deaths were related to congenital disorders with approximately 5 % of those being NTDs. For infant mortality, congenital disorders were notified in approximately 15 % of cases, with NTDs present in 10 % of the malformed children. Although statistically significant, the prevalence rate ratio (PRR) for spina bifida in live births was only 0.937 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.884-0.994), a decrease of 6.3 % when comparing the pre and post-fortification periods. The impact of fortification seemed to be more visible in fetal deaths due to anencephaly (PRR = 0.727, 95 % CI 0.681-0.777) and for spina bifida (PRR = 0.700, 95 % CI 0.507-0.967) with associated decreases of 27.3 and 30 %. The lower impact of folic acid fortification in Brazil, compared to other Latin-American countries, can be due to differences in dietary habits, concentration of folic acid in flour, as well as characteristic population ethnic composition. The HNA led to the identification of the needs to be addressed in Brazil, including the improvement of reporting congenital disorders within the nationwide birth certification system, and revision of the policy of flour folic acid fortification.

5.
Community Genet ; 6(2): 77-83, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14560067

RESUMO

To evaluate patterns of drug use during pregnancy and other potential reproductive risks in pregnant women, we applied a standard questionnaire to 412 pregnant women classified as low socioeconomic status (SES) or as middle/high SES, in two cities of South Brazil. 77% of the women used at least one medication during pregnancy. We observed significant differences, when comparing low SES and middle/high SES groups, for the following variables: teenage pregnancies (28.4 vs. 12.4%); self-medication (21.8 vs. 13.1%); smoking habits (21.5 vs. 5.1%); unplanned pregnancies (69.5 vs. 51.8%); unwanted pregnancies (31.3 vs. 10.9%), and abortion attempts (13.1 vs. 5.8%). The average number of drugs consumed, however, was not different between low SES and middle/high SES. We believe that better education and conditions for family planning are key points to improve this scenario.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez , Classe Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Feminino , Humanos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA