Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 32(6): 1135-1142, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404891

RESUMO

Blood glucose and its variability of is a major prognostic factor associated with morbidity. We hypothesized that intravenous microdialysis incorporated in a central venous catheter (CVC) would be interchangeable with changes in blood glucose measured by the reference method using a blood gas analyzer. Microdialysis and central venous blood glucose measurements were simultaneously recorded in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. The correlation between absolute values was determined by linear regression and the Bland-Altman test for repeated measurements was used to compare bias, precision, and limits of agreement. Changes in blood glucose measurement were evaluated by four-quadrant plot and trend interchangeability methods (TIM). In the 23 patients analyzed, the CVC was used as part of standard care with no complications. The correlation coefficient for absolute values (N = 99) was R = 0.91 (P < 0.001). The bias, precision and limits of agreement were - 9.1, 17.4 and - 43.2 to 24.9 mg/dL, respectively. The concordance rate for changes in blood glucose measurements (N = 77) was 85% with the four-quadrant plot. The TIM showed that 14 (18%) changes of blood glucose measurements were uninterpretable. Among the remaining 63 (82%) interpretable changes, 23 (37%) were interchangeable, 13 (20%) were in the gray zone, and 27 (43%) were not interchangeable. Microdialysis using a CVC appears to provide imprecise absolute blood glucose values with risk of insulin misuse. Moreover, only one third of changes in blood glucose measurements were interchangeable with the reference method using the TIM.


Assuntos
Análise Química do Sangue/métodos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Microdiálise/métodos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Idoso , Análise Química do Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Microdiálise/instrumentação , Microdiálise/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/instrumentação , Monitorização Intraoperatória/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 35(4): 261-7, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27083307

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the trending ability of calibrated pulse contour cardiac index (CIPC) monitoring during haemodynamic changes (passive leg raising [PLR] and fluid loading) compared with transpulmonary thermodilution CI (CITD). METHOD: Seventy-eight mechanically-ventilated patients admitted to intensive care with calibrated pulse contour following cardiac surgery were prospectively included and investigated during PLR, and after fluid loading. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a≥15% CITD increase after a 500ml bolus. Areas under the empiric receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCAUC) for changes in CIPC (ΔCIPC) during PLR to predict fluid responsiveness and after fluid challenge to predict an increase at least 15% in CITD after fluid loading were calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (71%) were classified as responders, 23 (29%) as non-responders. ROCAUC for ΔCIPC during PLR in predicting fluid responsiveness, its sensitivity, specificity, and percentage of patients within the inconclusive class of response were 0.67 (95% CI=0.55-0.77), 0.76 (95% CI=0.63-0.87), 0.57 (95% CI=0.34-0.77) and 68%, respectively. Bias, precision and limits of agreements and percentage error between CIPC and CITD after fluid challenge were 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.20), 0.26, -0.37 to 0.64 l min(-1)m(-2), and 20%, respectively. The concordance rate was 97% and the polar concordance at 30° was 91%. ROCAUC for ΔCIPC in predicting an increase of at least 15% in CITD after fluid loading was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76-0.92). CONCLUSION: Although ΔCIPC after fluid loading could track the direction of changes of CITD and was interchangeable with bolus transpulmonary thermodilution, PLR could not predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.


Assuntos
Débito Cardíaco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Calibragem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica , Assistência Perioperatória , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Termodiluição
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA