[The role of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy in the assessment of dysphagia in neurological patients.] / Ruolo dello studio scintigrafico del transito orofaringoesofageo nella valutazione della disfagia nei pazienti affetti da patologia neurologica.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the role of oropharingoesophageal scintigraphy (OPES) in the management of neurological patients, investigating the clinical value of semiquantitative analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 39 neurological patients clinically evaluated and scored according to the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS) scale who underwent fibrolaryngoscopic swallowing examination (FEES) and OPES using a 99mTc-nanocolloid-radioblabelled semiliquid bolus. We calculated the following semiquantitative parameters: Oral Transit Time (OTT), Pharyngeal Transit Time (PTT), Esophageal Transit Time (ETT), Retention Index (RI), and Esophageal Emptying Rate (EER10s). Differences in OPES semiquantitative parameters between patients classified according to the DOSS scale were performed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Optimal semiquantitative parameters cut-off values that correlated with DOSS classification were investigated with ROC curves. The agreement between OPES, FEES and DOSS results was measured using Cohen's Kappa test (K). RESULTS: A significantly higher OTT (p=0.028), PTT (p=0.011) and ETT (p=0.030) and lower EER10s (p=0.016) values were identified. Moderate agreement resulted between OPES and DOSS results (k=0.429, 95%CI: 0.143-0.715, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a significant correlation between clinical dysphagia graded using DOSS scale and semiquantitative parameters obtained by OPES evaluation. Despite reliable and reproducible OPES results, allowing an adequate study also of the esophageal phase, nowadays scintigraphic study remains an underestimated method to be considered in the diagnosis of dysphagia and related complications.

Safety culture to improve accidental event reporting in radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The potential for unintended and adverse radiation exposure in radiotherapy (RT) is real and should be studied because RT is a highly complex, multistep process, which requires input from numerous individuals from different areas and steps of the RT workflow. The 'Incident' (I) is an event the consequence of which is not negligible from the point of view of protection or safety. A 'near miss' (NM) is defined as an event that is highly likely to happen but did not occur. The purpose of this work is to show that through systematic reporting and analysis of these adverse events, their occurrence can be reduced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Staff were trained to report every type of unintended and adverse radiation exposure and to provide a full description of it. RESULTS: By 2018, 110 worksheets had been collected, with an average of 6.1 adverse events per year (with 780 patients treated per year, meaning an average incident rate of 0.78%). In 2001-2009, 37 events were registered (13 I and 24 NM), the majority of them were in the decision phase (12/37), while in 2010-2013, there were 42 (1 I and 41 NM) in both the dose-calculation and transfer phase (19/42). In 2014-2018, 31 events (1 I and 30 NM) were equally distributed across the phases of the RT process. In 9/15 cases of I, some checkpoint was introduced. CONCLUSION: The complexity of the RT workflow is prone to errors, and this must be taken into account by encouraging a safety culture. The aim of this paper is to present the collected incidents and near misses and to show how organization and practice were modified by the acquired knowledge.

Vertebroplasty Using Calcium Triglyceride Bone Cement (Kryptonite™) for Vertebral Compression Fractures. A Single-Centre Preliminary Study of Outcomes at One-Year Follow-up.

This study assessed the one-year clinical and radiographic outcomes, in terms of pain-relief, vertebral re-fracture and complications, after vertebroplasty (VP) using a new osteoconductive cement (calcium triglyceride bone cement - Kryptonite™ bone cement, Doctors Research Group Inc., Southbury, CT, USA) to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Sixteen consecutive osteoporotic patients (12 women and four men, mean age 68+/-10.5) were treated with VP using Kryptonite™ bone cement for a total of 20 vertebral fractures. All the patients complained of a pain syndrome resistant to medical therapy and all procedures were performed under fluoroscopy control with neuroleptoanalgesia using a monopedicular approach in 12 patients and bipedicular approach in four patients. All patients were studied by MR and MDCT and were evaluated with the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) before treatment and at one and 12 months after the procedure. A successful outcome was observed in 80% of patients, with a complete resolution of pain. Differences in pre and post treatment VAS and ODI at one-year follow-up were significant (P<0.0001). We observed a disk and venous leakage in 66% of patients but only in one case did an asymptomatic pulmonary embolism occur during cement injection. Two cases of vertebral re-fractures at distant metamers were observed during follow-up. VP using Kryptonite bone cement is a helpful procedure that allows complete and long-lasting resolution of painful vertebral symptoms. The cost of the material is very high and the rate of disk and venous leakage is too high compared to standard cement.