Association Between Mortality Due to Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Race in the United States From 2007 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: Asians and Pacific Islanders (API) exhibit increased incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, they are often excluded when the disease is studied. Risk-factors and incidence are well-researched while cancer-specific mortality trends remain unclear. We aimed to determine whether insurance status modifies the association between race and cancer-specific mortality in NPC patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used secondary data analysis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Patients ≥18 years with histologically confirmed primary NPC from 2007 - 2016 were included. The main outcome assessed was 5-year survival and the main exposure variable was race (API, white, black). Insurance status was classified into uninsured, any Medicaid, and insured (with any insurance). Potential confounders included age, sex, marital status, stage at diagnosis, and surgical treatment. Adjusted Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: 1610 patients were included (72.98% male, 27.02% female). 49.8% were API, 40.5% were Whites, and 9.8% Blacks. Maximum follow-up was 5-years. The adjusted hazards of 5-year cancer-specific death for API and Blacks compared with Whites were 0.77 (95% CI 0.62 - 0.96) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.65 - 1.31), respectively. Cases decreased with age in API and Blacks. 8.2% of cases had localized disease, 45.3% had local spread, and 44.6% had distant metastasis. Insurance status did not modify the association between race and mortality. CONCLUSION: Race is an important prognostic factor to account for in NPC patients. Investigating risk-factors and subtypes stratified by race may explain our findings.

Volumetry in the Assessment of Pituitary Adenoma Resection: Endoscopy versus Microscopy.

Background Assessment of the extent of resection after surgical resection of pituitary adenomas is most commonly reported in terms of the presence or absence of residual tumor. A quantitative comparison of volumetric resection between endonasal endoscopy (EE) and microsurgery (MS) has rarely been done. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of 154 patients with pituitary adenomas treated by the same surgeon at a single institution. We employed volumetric analysis pre- and postoperatively on two cohorts of pituitary adenoma patients treated through MS ( n = 37) versus EE approach ( n = 117). Results Volumetric analysis revealed a higher incidence of complete resection (64.4 vs. 56.8%) and mean volume reduction in the EE cohort (92.7 vs. 88.4%), although not significant. Recurrence rates were significantly lower in the EE group (7.7% vs 24.3%, p = 0.015). Subgroup analysis identified that patients with preoperative tumor volumes >1 mL were less likely to recur through EE (7.8 vs. MS: 29.6%; p = 0.0063). A higher incidence of complete resection was also noted in patients with favorable Knosp grades (0-1) (EE: 87.8 vs. MS: 63.2%; p = 0.036). Postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between both techniques. Conclusion Both microscopy and endoscopy are well-tolerated, effective approaches in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. Our series demonstrated that EE may be superior to MS in preventing tumor recurrence and achieving a complete resection in certain subsets of patients. EE provides a slight advantage in tumor control outcomes that may justify the paradigm shift to pure endoscopy at our center.

Assessment of human papillomavirus awareness in association with head and neck cancer at a screening event.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the baseline awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection as a cause of head and neck cancer (HNC) to design improved targeted screening and education efforts. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of collected survey at a cancer screening event. METHODS: This was a screening event at three hospitals and one community center in Miami, Florida. Participants were recruited throughout the Greater Miami area. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics of those who were aware of HPV and those who were not. Adjusted odds ratios, odds ratios, and χ2 tests were used in statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 196 women and 112 men were screened across four sites, with 187 participants at hospital-based events and 124 participants at the community-based event. Forty percent of respondents had heard of HPV, and 28.0% identified HPV as a risk factor for HNC. Non-Hispanic and Hispanic respondents were 3.309 and 2.445 times, respectively, more likely than Haitian respondents to have heard of HPV. Women were 2.488 times more likely than men to be aware of HPV. College graduates were 2.268 times more likely than those with less than a college degree to be aware of HPV. Younger respondents were more likely to be aware of HPV. Of those who identified HPV as a risk factor for HNC, 95.4% also correctly identified smoking and 75.9% also correctly identified alcohol as risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in HPV and HNC awareness were noted between gender, age, education level, and ethnicity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 128:386-392, 2018.