Factors influencing the indication of coronary angiography in patients presenting with chest pain unspecified: an analysis of two decades (1994-2014).

Guidelines for cardiac catheterization in patients with non-specific chest pain (NSCP) provide significant room for provider discretion, which has resulted in variability in the utilization of invasive coronary angiograms (CAs) and a high rate of normal angiograms. The overutilization of CAs in patients with NSCP and discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease is an important issue in medical care quality. As a result, we sought to identify patient demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors that influenced the performance of a CA in patients with NSCP who were discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We intended to establish reference data points for gauging the success of new initiatives for the evaluation of this patient population. In this 20-year retrospective cohort study (1994-2014), we examined 107 796 patients with NSCP from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System, a large statewide validated database that contains discharge data for all patients with cardiovascular disease admitted to every non-federal hospital in NJ. Patients were partitioned into two groups: those offered a CA (CA group; n = 12 541) and those that were not (No-CA group; n = 95 255). Geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were compared between the two groups using multivariable logistic regression, which determined the predictive value of each categorical variable on the odds of receiving a CA. Whites were more likely than Blacks and other racial counterparts (19.7% vs. 5.6% and 16.5%, respectively; P < .001) to receive a CA. Geographically, patients who received a CA were more likely admitted to a large hospital compared to small- or medium-sized ones (12.5% vs. 8.9% and 9.7%, respectively; P < .05), a primary teaching institution rather than a teaching affiliate or community center (16.1 % vs. 14.3% and 9.1%, respectively; P < .001), and at a non-rural facility compared to a rural one (12.1% vs. 6.5%; P < .001). Lastly from a socioeconomic standpoint, patients with commercial insurance more often received a CA compared to those having Medicare or Medicaid/self-pay (13.7% vs. 9.5% and 6.0%, respectively; P < .001). The utilization of CA in patients with NSCP discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease in NJ during the study period may be explained by differences in geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. Patients with NSCP should be well scrutinized for CA eligibility, and reliable strategies are needed to reduce discretionary medical decisions and improve quality of care.

Assessment of one-year risk of ischemic stroke versus major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Background: Patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of stroke. Several guidelines to assess the risk of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in AF patients have been published. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score has been adopted widely for predicting stroke within one year of the index AF diagnosis and is used to guide the prescription of anticoagulants. Anticoagulation therapy increases the risk of bleeding and scoring systems such as HAS-BLED assess the risk of major bleeding in anticoagulated patients. Despite these advances, no study has examined the risks of the two outcomes simultaneously. How patients' fear of particular outcomes affects these risks also remains unknown. Methods: We incorporated the risks of ischemic stroke and major bleeding within one year of the index AF admission as well as the fear of stroke and bleeding of each individual patient. The patients enrolled in this retrospective observational study were identified using hospital admission data from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS), a statewide database including all hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease in New Jersey. Probabilities of the outcomes (ischemic stroke, major bleeding, both, or neither within one year of the index AF admission) were estimated using multinomial regression with patient demographics and comorbidities (heart failure [HF], hypertension [HTN], diabetes mellitus [DM], anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], kidney disease [KD], prior stroke or transient ischemic attack [TIA]) as predictors. These estimates were used in a Deming regression to model the association of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in grouped patients. The assessment of the importance of each outcome was superimposed on the final model to arrive at a recommendation for anticoagulation therapy. Results: The results of the Deming regression indicated a positive relationship between ischemic stroke and major bleeding (slope = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37 to 1.97). Estimates of the risks of the two outcomes and the lines of best fit from Deming regression were determined. This model for risk assessment of stroke and major bleeding within one year of the index AF hospital admission combined objective data and subjective assessment of the relative fear of stroke versus bleeding by each hypothetical patient on 0-100 scale. Examples with the fears of stroke versus major bleeding being equal (50-50) and a higher fear of stroke (80-20) are presented. Conclusions: The new model for risk assessment of ischemic stroke and major bleeding within one year of the index AF hospital admission proposed in this work used objective, empirically driven measures, and subjective assessment of the outcomes' importance for individual patients. Such models may assist physicians in their decision making regarding anticoagulation therapy.

Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 5-Year Follow-up of Weight Loss, Comorbidity Resolution, and Cost.

Background. The Single-Port Instrument Delivery Extended Reach (SPIDER) surgical system is a safe revolutionary technology that defeated difficulties of single-incision surgery. We assessed the long-term outcomes of SPIDER sleeve gastrectomy (SPIDER SG) versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in morbidly obese patients. Methods. Retrospective review of patients who underwent SPIDER SG or LSG in our center matched by the date of surgery (2012-2013). We reviewed weight loss results up to 5 years, complication rates, procedure and hospitalization durations, financial cost, and effect on comorbidities. Results. Patients underwent 200 SPIDER SG and 220 LSG. At baseline, SPIDER SG versus LSG patients had a mean body mass index of 43.8 ± 5.6 and 48.6 ± 8.1 kg/m2, respectively. At 1 year, both groups had comparable percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). At 5 years, SPIDER SG had %EWL of 54.6 ± 24.8 compared with 57.8 ± 29.9 in LSG (P = .4). Nine SPIDER SG (4.5%) required conversion to LSG. Complications occurred in both groups: 4% versus 4.1% (P = .95). At 2-year follow-up, diabetes mellitus was reversed in 43% of SPIDER SG and 62% LSG. Despite a shorter hospital stay in SPIDER SG, the total cost was significantly higher ($2 041 477) compared with LSG ($1 773 834). The mean score of scar satisfaction was significantly more in SPIDER SG. Conclusions. SPIDER SG was safe with long-term effects on weight loss comparable to LSG. Despite the higher cost of SPIDER SG, a shorter hospital stay and better cosmesis were observed.

Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery in the Asia-Pacific Region: APMBSS 2018 Survey.

INTRODUCTION: The Asia-Pacific Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Society (APMBSS) held its congress in Tokyo at the end of March, 2018, and representatives from Asia-Pacific countries presented the current status of bariatric/metabolic surgery in the "National Reports" session. The data are summarized here to show the current status and problems in the Asia-Pacific region in 2017. METHODS: A questionnaire including data of 2016 and 2017 and consisting of eight general questions was prepared and sent to representatives in 18 Asia-Pacific countries by e-mail before the congress. After the congress, the data were analyzed and summarized. RESULTS: Seventeen of 18 countries responded to the survey. The frequency of obesity (BMI ≥ 30) in the 4 Gulf countries was > 30%, much higher than that in the other countries. In total, 1640 surgeons and 869 institutions were engaging in bariatric/metabolic surgery. In many East and Southeast Asian countries, the indication for bariatric surgery was BMI ≥ 35 or ≥ 37, whereas in many Gulf countries and Australia, it was BMI ≥ 40 or ≥ 35 with obesity-related disease. Ten of the 17 countries (58.8%) but only one of the 5 Southeast Asian countries (20.0%) had public health insurance coverage for bariatric surgery. In 2017, 95,125 patients underwent bariatric/metabolic surgery, with sleeve gastrectomy accounting for 68.0%, bypass surgery for 19.5%, and others for 12.5%. Current problems included public insurance coverage, training system, national registry, and lack of awareness and comprehension. CONCLUSION: This summary showed that bariatric/metabolic surgery is rapidly developing along with various problems in Asia-Pacific countries.