Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Virol Methods ; 254: 18-20, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29407208

RESUMO

Classically, detection of human enterovirus (EV) infections is based on virus isolation in tissue culture, proper sample collection and handling that optimizes virus viability. Samples are collected in virus transport medium (VTM) to ensure virus stability. High sensitivity and rapid results have made polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis increasingly popular for routine diagnosis. The PCR method enables simple sample collection and storage for EV diagnostics, which may eventually allow self-sampling at home. Our aim was to test a modification of the conventional clinical swab sample collection method for molecular diagnosis of EV infection. We compared swabs (cotton or synthetic) without VTM and the classical standard synthetic swabs with VTM. Effects of storage temperature (+4 °C or -80 °C) and duration were studied. EV-RNA could be detected by reverse transcriptase and nested PCR in both swab types without VTM. Differences depended on the storage duration and temperature. Optimum conditions were immediate processing or storage at -80 °C. Storage without VTM at +4 °C for longer periods is not advisable. We conclude that swabs without VTM can be considered for clinical EV-diagnostics based on PCR, and ultimately for epidemiological sample collection.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coxsackievirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coxsackievirus/virologia , Enterovirus/genética , Enterovirus/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Humanos , RNA Viral , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Manejo de Espécimes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA