Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Pediatrics ; 126(6): e1461-8, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21078738

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of continuous incident reporting and subsequent prevention strategies on the incidence of severe iatrogenic events and targeted priorities in admitted neonates. METHODS: We performed preintervention (January 1 to September 1, 2005) and postintervention (January 1, 2008, to January 1, 2009) prospective investigations based on continuous incident reporting. Patient-safety initiatives were implemented for a period of 2 years. The main outcome was a reduction in the incidence of severe iatrogenic events. Secondary outcomes were improvements in 5 targeted priorities: catheter-related infections; invasive procedures; unplanned extubations; 10-fold drug infusion-rate errors; and severe cutaneous injuries. RESULTS: The first and second study periods included totals of 388 and 645 patients (median gestational ages: 34 and 35 weeks, respectively; P = .015). In the second period the incidence of severe iatrogenic events was significantly reduced from 7.6 to 4.8 per 1000 patient-days (P = .005). Infections related to central catheters decreased significantly from 13.9 to 8.2 per 1000 catheter-days (P < .0001), as did exposure to central catheters, which decreased from 359 to 239 days per 1000 patient-days (P < .0001). Tenfold drug-dosing errors were reduced significantly (P = .022). However, the number of unplanned extubations increased significantly from 5.6 to 15.5 per 1000 ventilation-days (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective, continuous incident reporting followed by the implementation of prevention strategies are complementary procedures that constitute an effective system to improve the quality of care and patient safety.


Assuntos
Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 26(4): 369-73, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15865273

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of repeated point-prevalence surveys in measuring the trend in nosocomial infections after adjustment for case mix. SETTING: A 3,500-bed teaching facility composed of 4 acute care hospitals. METHODS: From May 1992 to June 1996, eight point-prevalence surveys of nosocomial infections were performed in the hospitals using a sampling process. The trend of adjusted nosocomial infection rates was studied for the four surveys that collected data on indwelling catheters. Adjusted rates were calculated using a logistic regression model and a direct standardization method. RESULTS: From 1992 to 1996, a total of 20,238 patients were included in the 8 point-prevalence surveys. The nosocomial infection rate decreased from 8.6% in 1992 to 5% in 1996 (P < .001). The analysis of adjusted nosocomial infection rates included 9,600 patients. Four independent risk factors were identified: length of stay greater than 12 days, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, and history of a surgical procedure. After adjustment for case mix, the nosocomial infection rate still showed a downward trend (from 7.2% in 1993 to 5.1% in 1996; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Adjusted prevalence rates of nosocomial infections showed a significant downward trend during the period of this study.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Idoso , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/tendências , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fatores de Risco , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA