Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(11): 1513-1525, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351214

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs) can be treated with surgical excision or radiation; however, approximately 1% of patients develop advanced disease. In 2018, the FDA approved cemiplimab-rwlc as the first programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody for the treatment of patients with metastatic CSCC or locally advanced CSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. In June 2020, pembrolizumab, another PD-1 monoclonal antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic CSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation. We previously reported on the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab vs historical standard of care for the treatment of advanced CSCC from a US perspective. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for patients with advanced CSCC in the United States. METHODS: A "partitioned survival" framework was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab. Clinical inputs were based on the most recent data cut of the phase 2 trials for cemiplimab (EMPOWER-CSCC-1; NCT02760498) and pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-629). Progression-free survival and overall survival were extrapolated using parametric models until all patients had progressed or died. Health state utilities were derived from data collected in the EMPOWER-CSCC-1 trial. Costs included drug acquisition, drug administration, disease management, terminal care, and adverse events and were based on published 2020 US list prices. To assess model uncertainty, 1-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted, alongside scenario analyses evaluating key modeling assumptions. RESULTS: In the base case, cemiplimab resulted in an incremental gain of 3.44 life-years (discounted) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $130,329 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) vs pembrolizumab. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY, PSA indicated a 71% probability that cemiplimab is cost-effective when compared with pembrolizumab. Scenario analysis resulted in ICERs ranging from $115,909 to $187,374. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that cemiplimab is a cost-effective treatment for patients with advanced CSCC, compared with pembrolizumab. These results should be interpreted cautiously in the absence of head-to-head trials; however, in the absence of such data, these results can be used to inform health care decisions over resource allocation. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Paul, Cope, Keeping, Mojebi, and Ayers are employees of PRECISIONheor, which received funding to produce this work. Chen, Kuznik, and Xu are employees and stockholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Sasane is an employee and stockholder of Sanofi, Inc. Konidaris, Atsou, and Guyot are employees of Sanofi, Inc. The authors were responsible for all content and editorial decisions and received no honoraria related to the development of this publication.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/economia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estados Unidos
2.
Value Health ; 24(3): 377-387, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641772

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) from a payer perspective in the United States. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab versus historical standard of care (SOC). All inputs were identified based on a systematic literature review, supplemented by expert opinion where necessary. Clinical inputs for cemiplimab were based on individual patient data from a cemiplimab phase 2 single-arm trial (NCT27060498). For SOC, analysis was based on a pooled analysis of single-arm clinical trials and retrospective studies evaluating chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab, erlotinib, and gefitinib) identified via a systematic literature review (6 of the 27 included studies). Overall survival and progression-free survival were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon. Costs were included for drug acquisition, drug administration, management of adverse events, subsequent therapy, disease management, and terminal care. Unit costs were based on published 2019 US list prices. RESULTS: In the base case, cemiplimab versus SOC resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $99 447 per quality adjusted-life year (QALY), where incremental costs and QALYs were $372 108 and 3.74, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000/QALY, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggests a 90% probability that cemiplimab is cost-effective compared to SOC. Scenario analyses resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $90 590 to $148 738. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with historical SOC, cemiplimab is a cost-effective use of US payer resources for the treatment of advanced CSCC and is expected to provide value for money.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/economia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Econométricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
3.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 3: 1-9, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35100695

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to assess the economic impact of using next-generation sequencing (NGS) versus single-gene testing strategies among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) from the perspective of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and US commercial payers. METHODS: A decision analytic model considered patients who were newly diagnosed with mNSCLC who received programmed death ligand 1 and genomic alteration tests-EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, HER2, RET, and NTRK1-using upfront NGS (all alterations tested simultaneously plus KRAS), sequential testing (sequence of single-gene tests), exclusionary testing (KRAS plus sequential testing), and hotspot panels (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF tested simultaneously plus single-gene tests or NGS for MET, HER2, RET, and NTRK1). Model outcomes for each strategy were time-to-test results, the proportion of patients identified harboring alterations with or without US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, and total testing costs. A budget impact analysis assessed the economic effects of increasing the proportion of NGS-tested patients. RESULTS: In a hypothetical 1,000,000-member health plan, 2,066 Medicare-insured patients and 156 commercially insured patients were estimated to have mNSCLC and to be eligible for testing. Time-to-test results were 2.0 weeks for NGS and the hotspot panel, faster than exclusionary and sequential testing by 2.7 and 2.8 weeks, respectively. NGS was associated with cost savings for both CMS ($1,393,678; $1,530,869; and $2,140,795 less than exclusionary, sequential testing, and hotspot panels, respectively) and commercial payers ($3,809; $127,402; and $250,842 less than exclusionary, sequential testing, and hotspot panels, respectively). Increasing the proportion of NGS-tested patients translated into substantial cost savings for both CMS and commercial payers. CONCLUSION: Use of upfront NGS testing in patients with mNSCLC was associated with substantial cost savings and shorter time-to-test results for both CMS and commercial payers.

4.
J Med Econ ; 19(3): 292-303, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26618853

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sub-optimal patient adherence to iron chelation therapy (ICT) may impact patient outcomes and increase cost of care. This study evaluated the economic burden of ICT non-adherence in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) or thalassemia. METHODS: Patients with SCD or thalassemia were identified from six state Medicaid programs (1997-2013). Adherence was estimated using the medication possession ratio (MPR) of ≥0.80. All-cause and disease-specific resource utilization per-patient-per-month (PPPM) was assessed and compared between adherent and non-adherent patients using adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR). All-cause and disease-specific healthcare costs were computed using mean cost PPPM. Regression models adjusting for baseline characteristics were used to compare adherent and non-adherent patients. RESULTS: A total of 728 eligible patients treated with ICT in the SCD cohort, 461 (63%) adherent, and 218 in the thalassemia cohort, 137 (63%) adherent, were included in this study. In SCD patients, the adjusted rate of all-cause outpatient visits PPPM was higher in adherent patients vs non-adherent patients (aIRR [95% CI]: 1.05 [1.01-1.08], p < 0.0001). Conversely, adherent patients incurred fewer all-cause inpatients visits (0.87 [0.81-0.94], p < 0.001) and ER visits (0.86 [0.78-0.93], p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed in SCD-related resource utilization rates and in thalassemia patients. Total all-cause costs were similar between adherent and non-adherent patients, but inpatient costs (adjusted cost difference = -$1530 PPPM, p = 0.0360) were lower in adherent patients. CONCLUSION: Patients adherent to ICT had less acute care need and lower inpatient costs than non-adherent patients, although they had more outpatient visits. Improved adherence may be linked to better disease monitoring and has the potential to avoid important downstream costs associated with acute care visits and reduce the financial burden on health programs and managed care plans treating SCD and thalassemia patients.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia por Quelação/economia , Quelantes de Ferro/economia , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Medicaid/economia , Adesão à Medicação , Talassemia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbidade , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
5.
J Comp Eff Res ; 4(4): 327-40, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26274794

RESUMO

AIMS: Iron overload adversely affects patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but benefits of iron chelation therapy have not been clearly demonstrated. We examined the association between deferasirox (DFX) therapy and mortality in transfusion-receiving Medicare patients. PATIENTS & METHODS: MDS patients from 2005 to 2008 were identified using ICD-9 codes from 100% Medicare claims. Patients receiving ≥20 blood units were observed until death or end of study. Marginal structural models were used for estimation. RESULTS: 3926 patients (10.1% used DFX) were observed for a mean of 48.8 weeks. Each incremental week of DFX was associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.989; 95% CI: 0.983-0.996; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: DFX therapy is associated with a reduced mortality risk among older MDS patients who received a minimum transfusion threshold.


Assuntos
Benzoatos/uso terapêutico , Transfusão de Sangue , Sobrecarga de Ferro/tratamento farmacológico , Sobrecarga de Ferro/mortalidade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/mortalidade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/terapia , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Deferasirox , Feminino , Humanos , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
J Emerg Med ; 49(4): 513-522.e1, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25910824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department Reliance (EDR: total emergency department [ED] visits/total ambulatory [outpatient + ED] visits) differentiates acute episodic ED users from those who may not have adequate access to outpatient care. OBJECTIVE: This study's aim was to investigate age-related patterns of EDR and associated health-care costs in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and those transitioning from pediatric to adult care. METHODS: State Medicaid data were used for this study. Patients with two or more SCD diagnoses and one or more blood transfusion were included. Quarterly rates of ED visits, EDR, SCD complications associated with ED visits, and ED visits resulting in hospitalization were evaluated. Risk factors associated with high EDR and the association between high EDR and health-care costs were explored through regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 3208 patients were included. The most common SCD complications associated with ED visits were pain, infection, and pneumonia. Beginning at the age of 15 years, EDR rose from 0.17 to 0.29 visits per quarter at age 22 years, and remained high throughout adulthood. Regression analyses indicated that patients were most likely to have high EDR during the post-transition period and when experiencing an SCD complication. Patients with high EDR incurred statistically significantly higher inpatient and ED costs, resulting in significantly higher total health-care costs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to children, patients transitioning to adulthood relied more on the ED for their care. In addition, patients with high EDR incurred more days in the hospital and significantly higher health-care costs, highlighting the need to improve transition-related support, including better access to primary care and increased engagement with patients with SCD.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Anemia Falciforme/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Transição para Assistência do Adulto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 56(10): 2803-11, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676036

RESUMO

Iron chelation therapies (ICTs) can help eliminate iron surplus in erythrocyte transfusion-dependent (TD) patients with myelofibrosis (MF). The study assessed adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of MF-related complications and resource utilization (RU) and adjusted mean monthly inpatient cost differences in patients with TD MF treated with versus without ICT (ICT+ vs. ICT-) using data from two healthcare claims databases. Patients with ≥ 2 MF International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes ≥ 30 days apart were included. Among 571 patients with TD MF, 103 (18%) were ICT+ and 468 (82%) were ICT-. ICT+ patients had lower rates of thrombocytopenia (aIRR: 0.55; p < 0.001), pancytopenia (0.53; p < 0.001), emergency room visits (0.84 [95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.96]) and inpatient stays (0.75 [0.64-0.87]), but higher rates of outpatient visits (1.21 [1.18-1.23]). Adjusted mean complication-related inpatient cost difference per month was lower in ICT+ patients (-$1804 [$570]; p = 0.004). ICT+ patients had significantly lower rates of acute care, but higher rates of outpatient care.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue , Terapia por Quelação , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Recursos em Saúde , Quelantes de Ferro , Mielofibrose Primária/complicações , Mielofibrose Primária/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Terapia por Quelação/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/efeitos adversos , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/economia , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Seguro Saúde , Quelantes de Ferro/economia , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Mielofibrose Primária/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reação Transfusional , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Med Econ ; 18(4): 312-22, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25565443

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases (BM) are highly prevalent among anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; yet little is known about their real-world treatment patterns and clinical and economic burdens. This study aimed to describe these patients' treatment patterns, symptoms, and costs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective study pooling data from three large administrative databases in the US (08/2011-06/2013). ALK+ NSCLC patients with BM and continuous enrollment for ≥ 60 days before and ≥ 30 days after the first observed BM diagnosis were identified by pharmacy records for crizotinib among patients with lung cancer and BM diagnostic codes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment patterns, symptoms, healthcare resource utilization, and costs, before and after BM diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 213 crizotinib patients with BM diagnoses meeting the selection criteria, 23.0% had BM prior to NSCLC diagnosis; 47.4% had BM prior to crizotinib initiation; 19.2% during crizotinib treatment; and 10.3% post-crizotinib treatment. For those diagnosed with BM after NSCLC diagnosis, the median time between the NSCLC and BM diagnoses was 88 days. Following the first observed BM diagnosis, 88.7% used chemotherapy, 63.4% had radiotherapy, and 31.9% had stereotactic radiosurgery. The prevalence of BM-related symptoms substantially increased post-BM-diagnosis: fatigue (from 15% to 39%), headaches (from 5% to 24%), and depression (from 5% to 15%). Monthly costs per patient averaged $5983 before the BM diagnosis and $22,645 after diagnosis. Patients' resource utilization increased significantly post-BM-diagnosis, with a 3-fold increase in OP visits and a 6-fold increase in IP stays. Post-BM-diagnosis costs were driven by pharmacy (42.0%), inpatient (29.6%), and outpatient costs (26.0%). LIMITATIONS: The study sample was limited to crizotinib-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Post-BM-diagnosis, patients experience high symptom burden. Post-BM-diagnosis, treatment is highly variable and costly: average monthly costs per patient almost quadrupled post-BM-diagnosis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/economia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/economia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economia , Pirazóis/economia , Piridinas/economia , Quinase do Linfoma Anaplásico , Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Comorbidade , Crizotinibe , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Receptores Proteína Tirosina Quinases/análise , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
J Med Econ ; 18(3): 241-8, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25422992

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic burden of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) recurrence in patients who received imatinib adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Data from the MarketScan and PharmMetrics databases between January 2000 and March 2013 were extracted. Patients who had received at least one diagnosis of GIST, had undergone a primary surgery for GIST, and had received at least one prescription for imatinib were included in the analysis. An algorithm was applied to identify those who had a subsequent GIST recurrence. Patients who experienced a recurrence and those who did not have a recurrence were compared for differences in healthcare utilization measures and healthcare costs within 6 months after the recurrence, while adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 540 patients with primary resectable GIST who received imatinib adjuvant therapy were identified, including 444 (82.2%) patients who did not experience GIST recurrence and 96 (17.8%) patients who did experience recurrence. Patients who experienced GIST recurrence utilized significantly more healthcare resources in all categories than patients who did not have a recurrence, including the number of hospitalizations, days of hospitalization, emergency room visits, outpatient visits, and other medical services (all p-values <0.01). The total healthcare cost was significantly higher for patients with GIST recurrence, with a difference of $4464 per patient per month (p < 0.01). Both the medical and pharmacy costs were significantly higher with adjusted differences of $3488 and $1423 per patient per month, respectively (both p-values <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had GIST recurrence after surgical resection incurred significantly more healthcare resource utilization and greater healthcare costs within 6 months after the recurrence than patients who did not have recurrence. These findings suggest that GIST recurrence is associated with a substantial economic burden.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/economia , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Antineoplásicos/economia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 14: 298, 2014 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25008431

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated survival, treatment, resource use, and costs among women with stage IV ER + breast cancer (BC) who did not receive HER2 targeted therapy. METHODS: Using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Medicare data from 2006-2009, women aged 66+ years with an incident diagnosis of stage IV ER + BC (index date) in 2007 and no HER2 targeted therapy were identified. A comparison cohort without cancer was created from the SEER 5% Medicare sample and matched 1:1 to the study cohort based on age, sex, and race. All patients had continuous enrollment for a 12-month baseline period prior to index and were followed until the end of the study window, disenrollment, or death, whichever came first. Resource utilization and costs (by place of service, reported per patient per month, PPPM) were compared across cohorts. Treatment patterns including receipt of surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, aromatase inhibitors (AI), and non-AI hormonal therapy were evaluated for study cohort patients with at least 2 months of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: 325 women with stage IV ER + BC without HER2 targeted therapy were identified and matched to 325 women without cancer. Mean age was 77 years for both cohorts, with average follow-up of 18 months for study patients and 26 months for comparison patients. Compared to the comparison cohort, study patients had significantly higher mortality (60.3% versus 31.1%, P < 0.001), shorter survival (survival at 36 months 28% vs. 62%) and higher resource utilization across all settings except for oral prescription drugs. Total PPPM healthcare costs were also significantly higher among study patients ($7,271 vs. $1,778, P < 0.001). Approximately 57% of study patients with 2+ months of follow-up received chemotherapy and over 62% received an AI during follow-up. Within 4 months of cancer diagnosis, surgery and radiation were received by 39% and 32% of study patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant excess clinical and economic burden among women with stage IV ER + breast cancer who did not receive HER2 targeted therapy. Future studies with more precise and recent data are warranted to confirm and extend these results.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Lapatinib , Medicare , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Quinazolinas/administração & dosagem , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER , Trastuzumab , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 60(5): 828-35, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23335275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study explored the blood transfusion patterns, SCD complications, utilization of iron chelation therapies (ICT), healthcare resource use, and costs in pediatric, transitioning (18 years old) and adult patients with SCD. PROCEDURE: Data from Florida (1998-2009), New Jersey (1996-2009), Missouri (1997-2010), Kansas (2001-2009), and Iowa (1998-2010) state Medicaid were used. Patients with ≥2 SCD diagnoses and ≥1 transfusion event were included. Rates of transfusion events, SCD complications, and proportion of eligible patients receiving ICT were calculated. ICT eligibility was defined as receiving ≥10 transfusions over lifetime. SCD complications included pain, pulmonary event, infection event, renal, cardiovascular, stroke, leg ulcers, and avascular necrosis. Regressions were used to assess risk factors for transfusion and identify the main drivers of costs. RESULTS: The sample included 3,208 patients. The transfusion rate increased from 1-year-old to a peak at 16 years old, then dropped until age 26 and remained stable thereafter. In contrast the frequency of diagnoses for SCD complications increased markedly after age 16. Post-transition patients (≥18 years old) were significantly associated with fewer transfusions (odds ratio: 0.80, P = 0.002). Among eligible patients for ICT, there was no statistically significant difference in total cost between the ICT and no ICT groups (adjusted cost difference, $136, P = 0.114). CONCLUSIONS: Patients transitioning to adult care received less transfusions and hydroxyurea, less ICT when eligible for chelation therapy, had higher healthcare costs and suffered from more frequent SCD related complications than pediatric patients. These findings highlight the changes in treatment patterns corresponding to transition to adult care.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Transfusão de Sangue , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia Falciforme/economia , Anemia Falciforme/epidemiologia , Terapia por Quelação , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Hidroxiureia/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Quelantes de Ferro/economia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Medicaid , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Med Econ ; 16(1): 10-8, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22947171

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study evaluated iron chelating therapy (ICT) discontinuation and costs in Sickle cell disease (SCD) Medicaid recipients using healthcare claims from 2006-2010. METHODS: Patients with ≥1 SCD diagnosis claim, ≥2 claims for deferoxamine (DFO) or deferosirox (DFX), and continuous enrollment ≥6 months prior to and 18 months following ICT initiation were included. Outcomes included treatment discontinuation, persistence (i.e., refill gaps ≥6 weeks), and total healthcare costs. RESULTS: The average age among 404 SCD patients meeting study inclusion criteria was 18.7 (±11.0) years, with 45.8% being males and 66.7% being Blacks. Switches or combinations from DFO at index occurred in 124 (74.7%) patients compared to 10 (4.2%) with DFX at index. The Cox regression model that assessed long-term medication persistence indicated a 1.30-times higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation with DFO compared to DFX (95% CI: 1.06-1.61). Some 19.7% of patient remained on DFX relative to 4.8% on DFO. Both inpatient and total costs were similar in DFX and DFO treatment groups. Following 1 year of treatment, 37.4% remained on DFX compared to 15.7% on DFO. Meaningful differences in treatment discontinuation between the two treatment groups did not occur until 220+ days during the study period. At 18-months, treatment discontinuation rates were high in both groups; 95% for DFO and 80% for DFX. CONCLUSION: This study of SCD Medicaid patients found more therapeutic switches from DFO to DFX and a higher medication persistency rate with DFX than DFO. The conclusions are limited by the study's retrospective nature, which depends on multivariate statistics to account for patient heterogeneity and risk factors.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Benzoatos/economia , Desferroxamina/economia , Quelantes de Ferro/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Triazóis/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Anemia Falciforme/economia , Anemia Falciforme/epidemiologia , Benzoatos/uso terapêutico , Transfusão de Sangue , Criança , Deferasirox , Desferroxamina/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos
13.
J Med Econ ; 16(1): 150-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22762291

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trial data have demonstrated that 3 years vs 1 year of adjuvant imatinib therapy for patients with surgically resected Kit+ Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) leads to a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival and overall survival. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of treating patients with 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib from a US payer's perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to predict GIST recurrence and treatment costs. Patients enter the model after surgery and transition among three health states: free of recurrence, recurrence, and death. Recurrence, mortality, costs, and utilities were derived from clinical trial and published literature. Expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated and discounted at 3%/year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Patients receiving 3 years of imatinib had higher QALYs (8.53 vs 7.18) than those receiving 1 year of imatinib. Total lifetime per-patient cost was $302,100 for 3 years vs $217,800 for 1 year of imatinib. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib was $62,600/QALY. Model results were sensitive to long-term rate of GIST recurrence (beyond 5 years) and cost of imatinib. At a threshold of $100,000/QALY, 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib was cost-effective in 100% of simulations. LIMITATIONS: The model is a simplified representation of disease natural history and may not account for all possible health states and complications associated with disease. Resource utilization on treatment was estimated using the resource use data from previous trials, therefore calculated medical costs might be over-estimated compared to the real-world setting. CONCLUSIONS: Model results suggest that treatment with 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib is cost-effective at a $100,000/QALY threshold. Clinical and economic results suggest treating surgically resected Kit+ GIST patients with 3 years of imatinib would result in improved quality-adjusted survival.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/economia , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Piperazinas/economia , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/economia , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Análise Custo-Benefício , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econométricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Transfusion ; 52(10): 2131-8, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22486790

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent retrospective studies suggest myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are more common than previously recognized and patients who develop transfusional dependence may be at risk for increased comorbid complications. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of Medicare claims focusing on costs associated with patients with a new claim listing ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Code 238.7 in first quarter of 2003. Patients were followed until 2005 to assess resource use and costs. RESULTS: A total of 512 patients aged 65 years or more with newly diagnosed MDS were identified. Forty percent had received red blood cell transfusions between 2003 and 2005. During the 3-year follow-up, transfused patients experienced increased prevalence of cardiac diseases, dyspnea, and infections. Cumulative 3-year mean Medicare costs for MDS patients were $49,156. Transfused patients had greater use of hospital inpatient and outpatient services and incurred significantly higher mean costs than nontransfused patients ($88,824 vs. $29,519, p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and clinical complications, transfusion was independently associated with a 48% increase in monthly costs in addition to the cost of transfusion administration. CONCLUSION: MDS places a significant economic burden on the US Medicare system. MDS patients requiring transfusions experience higher prevalence of new comorbid conditions and incur significantly higher Medicare costs than nontransfused patients during the initial 3 years after diagnosis.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Fatores de Crescimento de Células Hematopoéticas/economia , Fatores de Crescimento de Células Hematopoéticas/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/epidemiologia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/terapia , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 29(6): 461-74, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21452907

RESUMO

Patients with ß-thalassaemia, sickle cell disease (SCD) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) require chronic blood transfusions, which can lead to iron overload and substantial morbidity and mortality. To reduce the excess iron and its deleterious effects, available iron chelation therapy (ICT) in the US includes oral deferasirox or infusional deferoxamine (DFO). The aim of this study was to review and synthesize the available pharmacoeconomic evidence on ICT in patients with ß-thalassaemia, SCD and MDS in the US. We systematically identified and reviewed pharmacoeconomic studies of ICT in patients with ß-thalassaemia, SCD and MDS that either were published in MEDLINE-indexed, English-language journals from 1999 to 2009, or appeared in medical society websites and scientific meeting abstracts. We assessed available cost-of-illness, cost-of-treatment, cost-consequence, cost-effectiveness, utility and patient-satisfaction studies. The majority of the 20 identified studies assessed cost of treatment, mainly focusing on acquisition and administration costs of ICTs. Gaps in the published literature include current data on direct medical costs for patients with MDS, direct medical costs associated with complications of iron overload, direct non-medical costs, indirect costs and patient utilities. Different underlying model assumptions, methodologies and comparators were found in the cost-effectiveness studies, which yielded a broad range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for different ICTs. Comprehensive cost-of-illness studies are needed to address data gaps in the published literature regarding the economic burden of iron overload. Comparative-effectiveness studies that evaluate clinical, economic and patient-reported outcomes would help the medical community to better understand the value of different ICTs.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/economia , Sobrecarga de Ferro/economia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/economia , Talassemia beta/economia , Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Farmacoeconomia , Humanos , Sobrecarga de Ferro/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , Talassemia beta/tratamento farmacológico
16.
Dig Dis Sci ; 47(8): 1705-15, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12184519

RESUMO

This study uses national databases to examine the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on resource utilization in the United States. Approximately 1.5-2.7 million physician visits (599-1,043 per 100,000) yearly were related to IBS, with 45.3% seen by gastroenterologists, and 89% prescribed medications. Rates of physician visits by women were approximately 2.4-3.3 times higher than that for men. The average number of medication prescribed per visit was 1.83. Approximately 89% of the visits were prescribed with medications. The rate of hospitalization (5.1 per 100,000 in 1997) decreased by 60% and length of stay decreased from 5.5 to 3.1 days in the past decade. The average charges of IBS-related hospitalization were US$7,882. Our study found an apparent decreasing trend of IBS-related hospitalizations and no marked increase in office consultations in the past decade. However, a better case identification criterion is necessary to estimate the true disease burden.


Assuntos
Doenças Funcionais do Colo/terapia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA