Pharmacoeconomic analysis of biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on real-world data from the IORRA observational cohort study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting in Japan. METHODS: We used a state-transition model and parameters were determined from RA patients registered in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort study on 421 patients who had failed at least one DMARD and started either 1 of 4 bDMARDs (bDMARD group; adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and tocilizumab) or methotrexate (control group). bDMARD group was evaluated as two groups: sequence of any 1 of 4 bDMARDs with and without tocilizumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for bDMARD group were estimated using base-case analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and scenario sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: ICERs of bDMARD group with or without tocilizumab were $38,179 and $48,855, respectively. By PSA, these sequences had respective probabilities of 86.8% and 75.1% of falling below the assumed cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 in Japan. Scenario sensitivity analyses showed that the best population for initiating bDMARD was RA patients less than 50 years old with Japanese version of HAQ between 1.1 and 1.6 and using tocilizumab as the bDMARD. CONCLUSION: bDMARDs were cost-effective for RA patients based on a real-world setting in Japan.

Cost-effectiveness of tocilizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, versus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using real-world data from the IORRA observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting in Japan. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness was determined using a Markov model-based probabilistic simulation. Data from RA patients registered in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort study between April 2007 and April 2011 were extracted using a pair-matching method: tocilizumab group (n = 104), patients who used at least 1 disease-modifying anti- rheumatic drug and in whom tocilizumab treatment was initiated; methotrexate group (n = 104), patients in whom methotrexate treatment was initiated for the first time or after an interruption of 6 or more months. Assuming a 6-month cycle length, health benefits and costs were measured over a lifetime and discounted at an annual rate of 3%. RESULTS: Compared with methotrexate treatment, lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for tocilizumab treatment were approximately 1.5- and 1.3-times higher, respectively. Incremental cost per QALY gained with tocilizumab was $49,359, which was below the assumed cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY. The probability of tocilizumab being cost- effective was 62.2%. CONCLUSION: The simulation model using real-world data from Japan showed that tocilizumab (at a certain price) may improve treatment cost-effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe RA by enhancing quality-adjusted life expectancy.

Assessment of the effectiveness of golimumab 50-mg and 100-mg regimens in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of the golimumab (GLM) 50-mg and 100-mg regimens in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed RA patients who started GLM between September 2011 and July 2012. Patients were divided into three groups: a 50-mg group; a 50/100-mg group (had a dose increase to 100 mg); and a 100-mg group (started GLM at 100 mg). We assessed Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and treatment continuation rate. Risk factors associated with time to discontinuation of the 50-mg regimen were determined with proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 74 patients: 43 in the 50-mg group, 23 in the 50/100-mg group, and 8 in the 100-mg group. DAS28 improved from 4.0 ± 1.0, 4.8 ± 1.0, and 4.7 ± 1.9, respectively, at baseline to 2.4 ± 1.2, 3.3 ± 1.5, and 2.5 ± 0.7, respectively, at week 52. Treatment continuation rates at week 52 were 73.7%, 60.9%, and 87.5%, respectively. In the 50/100-mg group, the mean DAS28 improved significantly from 4.4 ± 1.2 before to 3.6 ± 1.3 12 weeks after the dose increase. Oral corticosteroid therapy ≥ 5 mg/day, previous use of two biologic agents, and DAS28 > 5.1 at initiation of GLM were significantly associated with discontinuation of the 50-mg regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Both GLM 50-mg and 100-mg regimens are effective in patients with RA in daily practice.

Analysis of direct medical and nonmedical costs for care of rheumatoid arthritis patients using the large cohort database, IORRA.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to determine the annual direct medical and nonmedical costs for the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using data from a large cohort database in Japan. METHODS: Direct medical costs [out of pocket to hospitals and pharmacies and for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)] and nonmedical costs (caregiving, transportation, self-help devices, house modifications) were determined for RA patients who were participants in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) studies conducted in October 2007 and April 2008. Correlations between these costs and RA disease activity, disability level, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 5,204 and 5,265 RA patients in October 2007 and April 2008, respectively. The annual direct medical costs were JPY132,000 [out of pocket to hospital (US$1 = JPY90 in 2007)], JPY84,000 (out of pocket to pharmacy), and JPY146,000 (CAM). Annual direct nonmedical costs were JPY105,000 (caregiving), JPY22,000 (transportation), JPY30,000 (self-help devices), and JPY188,000 (house modifications). Based on the utilization rate for each cost component, the annual medical and nonmedical costs for each RA patient were JPY262,136 and JPY61,441, respectively. Costs increased with increasing RA disease activity and disability level or worsening quality of life (QOL). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the IORRA database, patients with RA bear heavy economic burdens that increase as the disease is exacerbated. The results also suggest that the increase in medical and nonmedical costs may be ameliorated by the proactive control of disease activity.