Esophageal dysmotility in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: pathogenesis, assessment tools, manometric characteristics, and clinical implications.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) represents a growing cause of chronic esophageal morbidity whose incidence and prevalence are increasing rapidly. The disease is characterized by eosinophilic infiltrates of the esophagus and organ dysfunction. Typical symptoms include dysphagia, chest pain, and bolus impaction, which are associated to mechanical obstructions in most patients. However, up to one in three EoE patients has no visible obstruction, suggesting that a motor disorder of the esophagus may underlie symptoms. Although potentially relevant for treatment refractoriness and symptomatic burden, esophageal dysmotility is often neglected when assessing EoE patients. The first systematic review investigating esophageal motility patterns in patients with EoE was published only recently. Accordingly, we reviewed the pathogenesis, assessment tools, manometric characteristics, and clinical implications of dysmotility in patients with EoE to highlight its clinical relevance. In summary, eosinophils can influence the amplitude of esophageal contractions via different mechanisms. The prevalence of dysmotility may increase with disease duration, possibly representing a late feature of EoE. Patients with EoE may display a wide range of motility disorders and possible disease-specific manometric pressurization patterns may be useful for raising a clinical suspicion. Intermittent dysmotility events have been found to correlate with symptoms on prolonged esophageal manometry, although high-resolution manometry studies have reported inconsistent results, possibly due to the suboptimal sensitivity of current manometry protocols. Motor abnormalities may recover following EoE treatment in a subset of patients, but invasive management of the motor disorder is required in some instances. In conclusion, esophageal motor abnormalities may have a role in eliciting symptoms, raising clinical suspicion, and influencing treatment outcome in EoE. The assessment of esophageal motility appears valuable in the EoE setting.

Appropriateness of proton pump inhibitors treatment in clinical practice: Prospective evaluation in outpatients and perspective assessment of drug optimisation.

BACKGROUND: High rates of inappropriate proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions have been reported in retrospective database analyses. Assessing the appropriateness of long-term PPIs in outpatients, with a proactive approach at drug optimisation may enhance treatment adequacy. AIMS: To describe the characteristics of outpatients who are on long-term PPIs, to assess the magnitude of inappropriate PPI prescriptions, and to evaluate the rate of drug optimisation following specialist recommendations. METHODS: Appropriateness of long-term (>8weeks) PPI prescription was prospectively assessed in 249 consecutive patients referred to a Gastroenterology outpatient clinic. We recorded reason for prescription, dose, modality, duration of therapy, and attempts at PPI optimisation. RESULTS: PPIs were inappropriately prescribed in 96/249 patients (38.6%). Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (50/143, 35.0%) and prophylaxis of anti-platelet/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (5/49, 10.2%) were the most common PPI indications and those with the lowest rate of inappropriateness, while the highest rates were observed for treatment of dyspepsia (10/12, 83.3%) and anti-coagulant therapy (21/21, 100%). PPI treatment was optimised in 112 patients (45.0%). CONCLUSIONS: PPIs are inappropriately used in about 40% of outpatients, reflecting scant attention to guidelines. A proactive approach may improve therapeutic adequacy in approximately half of patients. Educational efforts to guide PPI prescription should be further pursued.

How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery).

OBJECTIVE: Antireflux surgery can be proposed in patients with GORD, especially when proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use leads to incomplete symptom improvement. However, to date, international consensus guidelines on the clinical criteria and additional technical examinations used in patient selection for antireflux surgery are lacking. We aimed at generating key recommendations in the selection of patients for antireflux surgery. DESIGN: We included 35 international experts (gastroenterologists, surgeons and physiologists) in a Delphi process and developed 37 statements that were revised by the Consensus Group, to start the Delphi process. Three voting rounds followed where each statement was presented with the evidence summary. The panel indicated the degree of agreement for the statement. When 80% of the Consensus Group agreed (A+/A) with a statement, this was defined as consensus. All votes were mutually anonymous. RESULTS: Patients with heartburn with a satisfactory response to PPIs, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH), patients with oesophagitis Los Angeles (LA) grade B or higher and patients with Barrett's oesophagus are good candidates for antireflux surgery. An endoscopy prior to antireflux surgery is mandatory and a barium swallow should be performed in patients with suspicion of a HH or short oesophagus. Oesophageal manometry is mandatory to rule out major motility disorders. Finally, oesophageal pH (±impedance) monitoring of PPI is mandatory to select patients for antireflux surgery, if endoscopy is negative for unequivocal reflux oesophagitis. CONCLUSION: With the ICARUS guidelines, we generated key recommendations for selection of patients for antireflux surgery.

Appropriateness in prescribing PPIs: A position paper of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) - Study section "Digestive Diseases in Primary Care".

The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice about thirty years ago has greatly improved our therapeutic approach to acid-related diseases for their well-recognized efficacy and safety. Despite the well-defined indications, however, the use of PPIs continues to grow every year in both western and eastern countries and this phenomenon poses serious queries that include the onset of potential adverse effects and the increase in health care costs. The major reason explaining this worrying market expansion is the inappropriate use of PPIs. In order to re-establish a correct use of these effective drugs in daily clinical practice, the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), nominated a panel of experts who reviewed the available clinical literature and produced a series of updated position statements on the use of PPIs in clinical practice.

The appropriate use of proton-pump inhibitors.

The introduction of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice since about thirty years has greatly improved our therapeutic approach to acid-related diseases for their well recognized efficacy and safety. Accordingly, the role of surgery has been enormously reduced in this field. The main indications for PPI use are universally acknowledged by many scientific societies and are the following: treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in its various forms and complications, eradication of H. pylori infection in combination with two or more antibiotics, therapy of H. pylori-negative peptic ulcers, healing and prevention of NSAID-associated gastric ulcers, co-therapy with endoscopic procedures to control upper digestive bleeding and medical treatment of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome. Despite the above well-defined indications, however, the use of PPIs continues to grow every year in both Western and Eastern countries and this phenomenon poses serious queries about the appropriate prescription of these drugs worldwide. In fact, the endless expansion of PPI market has created important problems for many regulatory authorities for two relevant features: the progressive and irreversible increase of the costs of therapy with this class of drugs and the greater potential harms for the patients. So, there is the need for a reappraisal of PPI correct indications for both general practitioners and various specialists in order to re-establish a correct use of these effective drugs in daily clinical practice, according to the best evidence-based guidelines.

Esophagogastric junction morphology assessment by high resolution manometry in obese patients candidate to bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a strong independent risk factor of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and hiatal hernia development. Pure restrictive bariatric surgery should not be indicated in case of hiatal hernia and GERD. However it is unclear what is the real incidence of disruption of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in patients candidate to bariatric surgery. Actually, high resolution manometry (HRM) can provide accurate information about EGJ morphology. Aim of this study was to describe the EGJ morphology determined by HRM in obese patients candidate to bariatric surgery and to verify if different EGJ morphologies are associated to GERD-related symptoms presence. METHODS: All patients underwent a standardized questionnaire for symptom presence and severity, upper endoscopy, high resolution manometry (HRM). EGJ was classified as: Type I, no separation between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD); Type II, minimal separation (>1 and < 2 cm); Type III, >2 cm separation. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight obese (BMI>35) subjects were studied. Ninety-eight obese patients referred at least one GERD-related symptom, whereas 40 subjects were symptom-free. According to HRM features, EGJ Type I morphology was documented in 51 (36.9%) patients, Type II in 48 (34.8%) and Type III in 39 (28.3%). EGJ Type III subjects were more frequently associated to Symptoms than EGJ Type I (38/39, 97.4%, vs. 21/59, 41.1% p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Obese subjects candidate to bariatric surgery have a high risk of disruption of EGJ morphology. In particular, obese patients with hiatal hernia often refer pre-operative presence of GERD symptoms. Testing obese patients with HRM before undergoing bariatric surgery, especially for restrictive procedures, can be useful for assessing presence of hiatal hernia.

Gastrointestinal motility disorder assessment in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: SSc is a clinically heterogeneous and generalized disease, characterized by thickness of the connective tissue of the skin and internal organs, such as the digestive tract, impairing gastrointestinal (GI) motility. Our aim is to evaluate retrospectively abnormalities of oesophageal motility, gastric emptying, oro-cecal transit time (OCTT) and small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in a large cohort of SSc patients. METHODS: Ninety-nine SSc patients were included in the study. Forty-two patients underwent oesophageal conventional manometry, 45 performed a [(13)C]octanoic acid breath test to measure gastric emptying time and all 99 patients performed a lactulose breath test in order to evaluate OCTT and SIBO. Data were compared with healthy controls. RESULTS: In SSc patients, median lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure [14 mmHg (25th-75th; 8-19) vs 24 mmHg (19-28); P < 0.01] and median wave amplitude [30 mmHg (16-70) vs 72 mmHg (48-96); P < 0.01] were lower than in controls. Oesophageal involvement, defined as reduced LOS pressure and ineffective oesophageal motility pattern, was encountered in 70% of SSc patients. A delayed gastric emptying time was present in 38% of SSc patients: mean t½ was 141 ± 79 min vs 90 ± 40 min of controls (P < 0.01). Also, OCTT was significantly delayed in SSc: median OCTT was 160 min (25th-75th; 135-180) vs 105 min (25th-75th; 90-135) of controls (P < 0.01). SIBO was observed in 46% of SSc compared with 5% of controls (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: GI involvement is very frequent in SSc patients. Oesophagus and small bowel are more frequently impaired, whereas delayed gastric emptying is less common.

Assessment of intestinal permeability using sugar probes: influence of urinary volume.

BACKGROUND: As the accuracy of the "Sugar Test" is currently debated, this study was conducted to focus on how urine volumes may impact the test results. METHODS: Fifty-five subjects, 23 healthy and 32 with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), were enrolled. Lactulose and D-mannitol dissolved in water were administered to all the participating subjects; the urine excreted was collected and the total urine volume was measured. The urine samples were analyzed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The results were expressed as percentage of urine recovery of lactulose and D-mannitol and lactulose/D-mannitol ratio (LMR). RESULTS: All subjects were divided into two groups: subjects with urine volume < 500 mL and subjects with urine volume > or = 500 mL. Urine analysis showed that the mean LMR was significantly lower in subjects with urine volume > or = 500 mL than in subjects with urine volume < 500 mL (0.02 +/- 0.02 vs 0.04 +/- 0.04; p < 0.05). A significant increase in D-mannitol recovery was found to be associated with greater urine volumes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The urine volume may influence urinary excretion of sugar probes. Intake of liquids should therefore be carefully monitored before and during the test and the volume of urine produced over the period of collection should be precisely measured.

Assessment of dietary fiber fermentation: effect of Lactobacillus reuteri and reproducibility of short-chain fatty acid concentrations.

This investigation had two aims: (i) to determine the reproducibility of SCFA production of two fibers: wheat dextrin and inulin, in two separate in vitro batch fermentation systems, and (ii) to determine if the addition Lactobacillus reuteri, a probiotic bacterium, enhanced the fermentation of wheat dextrin, inulin, and psyllium using in vitro batch fermentation. Samples were removed at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. SCFAs were measured by GC. L. reuteri improved inulin's fermentation profile by reducing the total SCFA peak at 4 h and enhancing fermentation at 8 and 12 h. Wheat dextrin and psyllium were largely unaffected. Wheat dextrin's total SCFA and propionate production curves were steady and replicable, but concentration values varied between fermentations. Partially hydrolyzed guar gum (PHGG) and wheat dextrin had similar fermentation patterns from 0-8 h, but PHGG plateaued at 8 h for all measures. Psyllium produced peak SCFA concentrations at 8 h, similar to inulin. L. reuteri could be combined with inulin for enhancing fermentation, but it does not improve wheat dextrin or psyllium fermentation. Wheat dextrin will likely produce similar physiological within a group of individuals due to the reproducibility of fermentation.

Management strategy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison between empirical treatment with esomeprazole and endoscopy-oriented treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Whether patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and without alarm features should be treated empirically or undergo endoscopy first is a debated issue. In this study, our aim was to assess the efficacy, and to compare the direct costs and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL), of two treatment strategies (empirical vs endoscopy-oriented treatment) in a large population of patients with GERD. METHODS: In total, 612 patients were randomized to either empirical treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg once daily (od) (group 1, N = 309) or endoscopy and treatment according to endoscopic findings (group 2, N = 303, esomeprazole 40 mg od in patients with reflux esophagitis and esomeprazole 20 mg od in patients without esophagitis) for 4 wk, followed by esomeprazole 20 mg od maintenance treatment in both groups. Direct costs and HRQL were analyzed in both treatment arms. RESULTS: At the end of the acute treatment phase (week 4), 267 patients in group 1 (86.4%) and 265 patients in group 2 (87.5%) were considered responders to treatment (intention-to-treat analysis, P= 0.878). Empirical treatment proved to be cost-effective by saving 38.72 euros per treated patient. At the end of the maintenance phase (week 24), a similar proportion of patients responded to treatment in the two groups (71.8%vs 68.3%, P= 0.389). HRQL improved from baseline to week 24 in both groups (difference between study groups not significant). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GERD, empirical treatment with esomeprazole proved to be cost-effective compared with endoscopy-oriented treatment, and did not negatively affect patient HRQL. These results should be taken into account in the management of GERD patients in clinical practice.

Burden of illness in Italian patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), characterized by frequent episodes of heartburn, imposes considerable burdens on both patients and health services. In addition to both patients and health services. In addition to gastrointestinal symptoms, GORD may precipitate a variety of extra-oesophageal complications, such as asthma and chest pain, which can significantly impair patients' quality of life. This paper aims to describe the impact of heartburn on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) in Italy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Consecutive patients from general practices and gastroenterology clinics who were experiencing heartburn were invited to complete a selection of standardized patient-reported outcomes instruments, including Italian translations of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36), Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale. Frequency and severity of heartburn in the preceding week were recorded. RESULTS: Assessments were completed by 152 patients (mean age, 47 years), of whom 60% were female. Sixty-one per cent had moderate symptoms and 74% had symptoms on three or more days in the previous week. Patients were most bothered by reflux, abdominal pain and indigestion. As a result of their symptoms, patients experienced impaired vitality, sleep disturbance and other alimentary problems. This led to impaired HRQL across all but one SF-36 domain. According to the HAD scale, 21% of patients were depressed and 19% were anxious. CONCLUSION: GORD substantially impairs many aspects of HRQL, including sleep, vitality and emotional health.

Once-Daily Bedtime Dose of Roxatidine and Ranitidine in Acute Duodenal Ulcer: A Combined Assessment of Acid Inhibitory Activity and Healing Rate.

This study was carried out in order to compare the antisecretory effect of a single bedtime dose of roxatidine 150 mg and ranitidine 300 mg and to assess the relationship between the degree and the duration of acid suppression and the healing rates obtained in duodenal ulcer patients treated with the above regimens. Sixty-three patients with endoscopically proven ulcer underwent 24-h gastric pH-metry on day 0, day 1, and day 28 of treatment with both roxatidine and ranitidine. Ulcer healing was checked endoscopically after 4 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Eight patients did not complete the study, leaving 55 patients eligible for final analysis, 28 in the roxatidine group and 27 in the ranitidine group. Duodenal ulcers were healed in 24--28 (85%) patients of the former and in 22--27 (81%) patients of the latter group (p minus sign NS). Gastric pH was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than basal values on days 1 and 28 with both H2-antagonists. The 24-h pH levels did not differ between day 1 and day 28 with both roxatidine and ranitidine. There was also do difference between the two active treatments. The pattern of gastric acidity significantly differed (p < 0.01) between responder (n = 46) and nonresponder (n = 9) patients to both H2-blockers, and this difference was mainly sustained by nocturnal pH. CONCLUSIONS: A bedtime close of roxatidine 150 mg and ranitidine 300 mg was able to heal more than 80% of duodenal ulcers within 4 weeks of treatment. The lack of tolerance to H2-blockers in duodenal ulcer patients contributes to this good result. The antisecretory effect of H2-antagonists is reduced in nonresponder patients with respect to responder patients and this is mainly due to an impaired control of nocturnal acidity.