Delaying the Fellowship Start Date in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate residents planning fellowship, their preferences for fellowship start date, and the acceptability of resultant gaps in pay and insurance coverage. METHODS: A survey was conducted during the 2022 in-service training examination querying obstetrics and gynecology residents about their desire to pursue fellowship, their preferred fellowship start date (understanding the salary gap), and the acceptability of a medical insurance gap. RESULTS: Survey analysis of respondents planning to pursue fellowship demonstrated that, acknowledging the pay gap that would occur, 93.9% preferred a fellowship start date after July 1, with the majority (65.1%, 593/911) preferring an August 1 fellowship start date. Most respondents (87.7%, 798/910) found the potential resultant gap in medical insurance coverage acceptable. Survey data showed that racial and ethnic identity was not a determining factor in either of these issues. CONCLUSION: The majority of current residents planning to pursue fellowship prefer a delayed fellowship start date, even if it means a gap in salary and insurance coverage. The results of this study, requested by a specialty-wide, consensus-building workgroup, informed a statement signed by the majority (88.9%) of workgroup constituents supporting an August 1 clinical fellowship start date.

Inconsistent Mandated Access to Fertility Preservation: A Review of Relevant State Legislation.

With improvement in cancer therapies, there has been an increasing emphasis on survivorship, including options for fertility preservation. Fertility preservation is the process of either protecting or saving gametes or reproductive tissues for potential future procreation. Methods and outcomes of fertility preservation have similarly been rapidly advancing. Before initiation of gonadotoxic therapy, health care providers must consider future fertility of patients and provide options for fertility preservation. Nonetheless, the cost of fertility preservation can be prohibitory. Depending on a patient's state of residence, insurance may be mandated to cover, or offer to cover, the cost of fertility preservation. State legislation continues to change; however, legislation at the federal level has been proposed to make this coverage more cohesive. This commentary reviews current state legislation regarding mandates to cover the cost of fertility preservation for patients at risk for iatrogenic infertility and outlines the importance of developing federal legislation to improve patient access to care.