Healthcare utilisation and costs associated with adding montelukast to current therapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and co-morbid allergic rhinitis: PRAACTICAL study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the healthcare resource use and costs associated with adding montelukast to therapy in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma and co-morbid seasonal allergic rhinitis whose asthma is inadequately controlled by their current asthma therapy. METHODS: A multicentre, pre-post retrospective cohort study was conducted in three European countries (Italy, Poland and Spain). Consecutive patients who were receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy (monotherapy or combination therapy with long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists) and who started concomitant treatment with montelukast between January 1999 and December 2002 were identified from clinical charts. Asthma/seasonal allergic rhinitis-related concomitant medications and asthma-related outpatient care, ED visits and hospitalisations for the periods 12 months before and 12 months after montelukast initiation were recorded from patient charts and combined with country-specific published unit costs (adjusted to 2004 values). The analysis was performed from a third-party-payer perspective and thus direct healthcare resource utilisation due to asthma/seasonal allergic rhinitis and associated costs for each country were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 98 physicians provided data for 696 asthmatic patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (Italy: n = 158; Poland: n = 334; and Spain: n = 204). The mean age of patients was 32.7 years, 57.5% were female and patients had asthma that was considered either mild-persistent (54.5%) or moderate-persistent (45.5%) according to the Global Initiative for Asthma classifications. The introduction of montelukast (10 mg/day daily cost range euro0.8-1.68) was associated with increases in the total annual mean healthcare cost per patient of 11.9%, 60.4% and 5.5% for Italy, Poland and Spain, respectively. However, mean annual costs for asthma-related outpatient care, ED visits and hospitalisations dropped significantly in all three countries (Italy: from euro805.00 to euro281.60 [p < 0.01]; Poland: from euro127.10 to euro99.00 [p < 0.01]; and Spain: from euro463.40 to euro119.70 [p < 0.01]). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of montelukast to therapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and concomitant seasonal allergic rhinitis whose asthma was inadequately controlled by current asthma therapy significantly reduced the use of concomitant asthma-allergy medications, ED visits, outpatient care visits and hospitalisation. The total direct healthcare cost obtained after the addition of montelukast increased only as a result of the montelukast treatment cost.

Asthma and allergy medication use and costs among pediatric primary care patients on asthma controller therapy.

As observational studies in children initiating GINA-Step 3 therapies are scarce, we evaluated outcomes and costs in a primary care cohort. Two-yr retrospective cohort study included French children (age: 6-14) continuously followed in BKL-Thalès database who received > or =2 consecutive prescriptions for GINA-Step 3 therapy (=addition of montelukast or other controllers ('other'), such as increasing inhaled-corticosteroid dose (hICS), adding long-acting beta agonist (LABA), or ICS + LABA). After matching on gender and propensity score, medication use [rescue (short-acting beta agonists), acute (antibiotics (AB), oral corticosteroids (OCS)), allergy (antihistamines, nasal steroids) and other respiratory] was estimated via mean number of prescriptions and mean cost (per child/per month), and cost trends. During 12-month follow-up, children adding montelukast (n = 71) vs. 'other' (n = 213) had similar asthma rescue/acute and allergy medication use. Subgroup with asthma and allergic rhinitis (A + AR) adding montelukast used less OCS and AB (p = 0.014). Two-yr cost trends suggest stable asthma/allergy medication use in montelukast group (0.83 euro) compared with increase in 'other' (5.39 euro), which was driven by nasal steroid use [0.32 euro ('other') vs. -0.04 euro (montelukast), p = 0.0013]. In subgroup with A + AR decline in asthma/allergy medication use in montelukast group (-0.47 euro) vs. increase in 'other' (11.05 euro), p = 0.015, was driven by differences in AB and OCS (p = 0.04) and nasal steroid use (p = 0.001). Concomitant asthma/allergy medication use was similar in children adding montelukast or 'other' controllers (hICS, LABA, ICS + LABA), while children with allergic rhinitis on montelukast used less AB. Concomitant medication costs after addition of montelukast remained stable, while 'other' group experienced increase, especially in children with concomitant allergic rhinitis.

Burden of concomitant allergic rhinitis in adults with asthma.

Asthma (A) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common conditions with evidence of shared epidemiological and patho-physiological backgrounds. A systematic review of the literature in the last three decades was performed to summarize both the prevalence and the economic burden of concomitant AR in adult patients with asthma. The reported prevalence estimates of concomitant AR in patients with asthma in the United States and in Europe studies is in excess of 50%, with up to 100% prevalence reported in patients with allergic asthma. In these populations, asthma-related medical resource use, including asthma attacks, emergency room visits, physician visits, and prescription medication use, is higher among asthmatic patients with concomitant AR compared to those without AR. These patients also experience more frequent absence from work and decreased productivity. A low prevalence (6.2%) of comorbid AR in people with asthma has been reported in a single study from Asia. A combined treatment strategy as recommended by international guidelines may improve asthma outcomes in asthmatic patients with concomitant AR.