Systematic Review of Racial/Ethnic Outcome Disparities in Home Health Care.

INTRODUCTION: Though extensive evidence demonstrates that U.S. minority patients suffer health care disparities, the incidence of disparities among the 3.3 million adult patients receiving skilled intermittent home health care services annually is unclear. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the relationship of race/ethnicity on home health care patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: PRISMA guidelines were used to perform a systematic search of the literature within the CINHAL, Medline, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included variations on the terms: home health, minority race/ethnicity, and patient outcomes. Included studies evaluated adult patient outcomes to intermittent skilled home health care services from Medicare-certified agencies using federally defined race/ethnicity categories. Research quality was evaluated using the Johns Hopkins Evidence Based Practice Grading Scale. RESULTS: Seven studies were identified in the search. All studies were of good-to-high quality with the majority having large samples. All seven found a significant difference in patient outcomes related to race/ethnicity. Specifically, minority patients had more adverse events, less improvement in functional outcomes, and worse patient experiences when compared with majority patients. CONCLUSION: Home health care disparities exist and efforts should be made to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate care to all patients.

Reliability of tristimulus colourimetry in the assessment of cutaneous bruise colour.

BACKGROUND: Bruising is one of the most common types of injury clinicians observe among victims of violence and other trauma patients. However, research has shown commonly used qualitative description of cutaneous bruise colour via the naked eye is subjective and unreliable. No published work has formally evaluated the reliability of tristimulus colourimetry as an alternative for assessing bruise colour, despite its clinical and research applications in accurately assessing skin colour. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the test-retest and inter-observer reliability of tristimulus colourimetry in the assessment of cutaneous bruise colour. METHODS: Two researchers obtained repeated tristimulus colourimetry measures of cutaneous bruises with participants of diverse skin colour. Measures were obtained using the Minolta CR-400 Chomameter. Commission Internationale d'Eclairage (CIE) L*a*b* colour space was used. Data was analysed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's alpha, and minimal detectable change (MDC) on all three L*a*b* values. RESULTS: The colorimeter demonstrated excellent test-retest or intra-rater reliability (L* ICC=0.999; a* ICC=0.973; b* ICC=0.892) and inter-rater reliability (L* ICC=0.997; a* ICC=0.976; b* ICC=0.982). CONCLUSIONS: With consistent placement, the tristimulus colourimetry is reliable for the objective assessment and documentation of cutaneous bruise colour for purposes of clinical practice and research. Recommendations for use in practice/research are provided.