MOG-IgG testing strategies in accordance with the 2023 MOGAD criteria: a clinical-laboratory assessment.

BACKGROUND: Live cell-based assay (LCBA) is the gold standard for MOG-IgG detection, and fixed CBA (FCBA) is a widely used commercial alternative. Recent criteria attributed a diagnostic value to MOG-IgG titration with both LCBA and FCBA, with low-titre samples requiring additional supporting features for MOGAD diagnosis. However, FCBA titration is not validated. We aimed to assess the impact of the criteria-based MOG-IgG testing in MOGAD diagnosis. METHODS: Thirty-eight serum samples of LCBA MOG-IgG1-positive MOGAD patients were titred on MOG-IgG LCBA and FCBA, and the presence of supporting features for MOGAD assessed. MOGAD criteria were evaluated in four testing scenarios: (a) FCBA without titration; (b) FCBA with titration; c) LCBA without titration; (d) LCBA with titration. RESULTS: FCBA without titration failed to reach MOGAD diagnosis in 11/38 patients (28.9%, negative results in 5, lack of supporting features in 6). Patients with unconfirmed diagnosis had optic neuritis (ON, n = 8), or transverse myelitis (TM, n = 3). FCBA with titration allowed MOGAD diagnosis in 4 additional patients. Correlation between LCBA and FCBA titres was moderate (Spearman's rho 0.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FCBA yields high rate of misdiagnosis mainly due a lower analytical sensitivity. FCBA titration provides a moderate diagnostic advantage in FCBA positive patients.

Autoantibody Diagnostics in Neuroimmunology: Experience From the 2018 Italian Neuroimmunology Association External Quality Assessment Program.

Background: Neuroimmunology has impressively expanded in the past decade. Novel assays, especially cell-based assays (CBAs) can detect conformational antibodies (Abs) recognizing antigens in their native conformation. Generally, the availability of in-house and of commercial tests has improved the diagnostics, but introduced demanding laboratory tasks. Hence, standardization and quality controls represent a key step to promote accuracy. We report on the results of the 2018 external quality assessment program (EQAP) organized by the Italian Neuroimmunology Association. Methods: EQAP regarded 10 schemes, including oligoclonal bands (OCBs), intracellular-neuronal (ICN)-Abs, neuronal-surface (NS)-Abs, aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-Abs, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-Abs, myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG)-Abs, ganglioside-Abs, acetylcholine-receptor (AChR)-Abs, and muscle-specific-kinase (MuSK)-Abs, and 34 laboratories. Assays were classified as tissue-based assays (TBAs), solid-phase assays (SPAs), liquid-phase assays (LPAs), and CBAs. Thirty-three samples were provided. Results: Three-quarter of the tests were commercial. Median accuracy for the laboratories was 75% (range 50-100). In 8/10 schemes, at least one sample provided discrepant results. Inter-laboratory "substantial agreement" was found in 6/10 schemes (AChR, MuSK, MAG, AQP4, MOG, and NS-Abs), whereas the worst agreements regarded OCBs and ganglioside-Abs. Both commercial and in-house assays performed better in experienced laboratories. Conclusions: Assays could be divided in (a) robust commercial tests with substantial inter-laboratory agreement (MAG-Abs; AChR- and MuSK-Abs); commercial/"in-house" tests with (b) partial inter-laboratory agreement (AQP4-Abs, MOG-Abs, NS-Abs, ICN-Abs), and (c) with large inter-laboratory disagreement (OCBs, ganglioside-Abs). This real-life snapshot of the neuroimmunology test performances highlights shortcomings attributable to technician-dependent performances, assay structural limitations, and errors in test interpretations.