Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg ; 256(3): 476-86, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22868371

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Injury and shock lead to alterations in conventional coagulation tests (CCTs). Recently, rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) has become recognized as a comprehensive assessment of coagulation abnormalities. We have previously shown that admission r-TEG results are available faster than CCTs and predict pulmonary embolism. We hypothesized that r-TEGs more reliably predict blood component transfusion than CCTs. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted between September 2009 and February 2011 who met the highest-level trauma activations were included. All had admission r-TEG and CCTs. We correlated r-TEG values [activated clotting time (ACT), r, k, α, maximal amplitude (MA), LY30] with their corresponding CCTs [prothrombin time (PT)/activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), international normalized ratio (INR), platelet count and fibrinogen] for transfusion requirements. Charges were calculated for each test. Demographics, vital signs, and injury severity were recorded. RESULTS: We studied 1974 major trauma activations. The median injury severity score was 17 [interquartile range 9-26]; 25% were in shock; 28% were transfused; and 6% died within 24 hours. Overall, r-TEG correlated with CCTs. When controlling for age, injury mechanism, weighted-Revised Trauma Score, base excess and hemoglobin, ACT-predicted red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and the α-angle predicted massive RBC transfusion better than PT/aPTT or INR (P < 0.001). The α-angle was superior to fibrinogen for predicting plasma transfusion (P < 0.001); MA was superior to platelet count for predicting platelet transfusion (P < 0.001); and LY-30 (rate of amplitude reduction 30 minutes after the MA is reached) documented fibrinolysis. These correlations improved for transfused, shocked or head injured patients. The charge for r-TEG ($317) was similar to the 5 CCTs ($286). CONCLUSIONS: The r-TEG data was clinically superior to results from 5 CCTs. In addition, r-TEG identified patients with an increased risk of early RBC, plasma and platelet transfusions, and fibrinolysis. Admission CCTs can be replaced with r-TEG.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Transfusão de Componentes Sanguíneos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemorragia/terapia , Tromboelastografia , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Adulto , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/etiologia , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Texas , Tromboelastografia/economia , Tromboelastografia/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA