Caregiver-based perception of disease burden in Schaaf-Yang syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Schaaf-Yang syndrome (SYS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by truncating variants in the paternally expressed MAGEL2 gene in the Prader-Willi syndrome-region on chromosome 15q. In addition to hypotonia and intellectual disability, individuals with SYS are frequently affected by neonatal contractures and autism spectrum disorder. In this study, we focus on the burden of disease on patients and their families for the first time. METHODS: Based on the online SYS Patient Voices Survey the perspective of 81 primary caregivers on SYS was assessed. RESULTS: The perceived severity of muscular and developmental manifestations dominated the evaluation of the phenotype in early childhood, while behavioral issues were considered more impactful later in life. Importantly, an apprehension toward symptoms with a later onset was observed in caregivers of younger children. Available therapeutic options, while mostly effective, did not sufficiently alleviate the total burden of disease. Overall, parents stated that caring for an individual with SYS was very challenging, affecting their daily lives and long-term planning. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the necessity for treatments that, adapted to age and in accordance with the caregivers' prioritization, improve the patients' medical condition and thus facilitate their and their families' social participation.

BRCA1/2 potential founder variants in the Jordanian population: an opportunity for a customized screening panel.

A founder variant is a genetic alteration, that is inherited from a common ancestor together with a surrounding chromosomal segment, and is observed at a high frequency in a defined population. This founder effect occurs as a consequence of long-standing inbreeding of isolated populations. For high-risk cancer predisposition genes, such as BRCA1/2, the identification of founder variants in a certain population could help designing customized cost-effective cancer screening panels. This advantage has been best utilized in designing a customized breast cancer BRCA screening panel for the Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) population, composed of the three BRCA founder variants which account for approximately 90% of identified BRCA alterations. Indeed, the high prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants among AJ (~ 2%) has additionally contributed to make population-based screening cost-effective in comparison to family-history-based screening. In Jordan there are multiple demographic characteristics supporting the proposal of a founder effect. A high consanguinity rate of ~ 57% in the nineties of the last century and ~ 30% more recently is a prominent factor, in addition to inbreeding which is often practiced by different sub-populations of the country.This review explains the concept of founder effect, then applies it to analyze published Jordanian BRCA variants, and concludes that nine pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) BRCA2 variants together with one pathogenic BRCA1 variant are potential founder variants. Together they make up 43% and 55% of all identified BRCA1/2 alterations in the two largest studied cohorts of young patients and high-risk patients respectively. These variants were identified based on being recurrent and either specific to ethnic groups or being novel. In addition, the report highlights the required testing methodologies to validate these findings, and proposes a health economic evaluation model to test cost-effectiveness of a population-based customized BRCA screening panel for the Jordanian population. The aim of this report is to highlight the potential utilization of founder variants in establishing customized cancer predisposition services, in order to encourage more population-based genomic studies in Jordan and similar populations.

aRgus: Multilevel visualization of non-synonymous single nucleotide variants & advanced pathogenicity score modeling for genetic vulnerability assessment.

The widespread use of high-throughput sequencing techniques is leading to a rapidly increasing number of disease-associated variants of unknown significance and candidate genes. Integration of knowledge concerning their genetic, protein as well as functional and conservational aspects is necessary for an exhaustive assessment of their relevance and for prioritization of further clinical and functional studies investigating their role in human disease. To collect the necessary information, a multitude of different databases has to be accessed and data extraction from the original sources commonly is not user-friendly and requires advanced bioinformatics skills. This leads to a decreased data accessibility for a relevant number of potential users such as clinicians, geneticist, and clinical researchers. Here, we present aRgus (https://argus.urz.uni-heidelberg.de/), a standalone webtool for simple extraction and intuitive visualization of multi-layered gene, protein, variant, and variant effect prediction data. aRgus provides interactive exploitation of these data within seconds for any known gene of the human genome. In contrast to existing online platforms for compilation of variant data, aRgus complements visualization of chromosomal exon-intron structure and protein domain annotation with ClinVar and gnomAD variant distributions as well as position-specific variant effect prediction score modeling. aRgus thereby enables timely assessment of protein regions vulnerable to variation with single amino acid resolution and provides numerous applications in variant and protein domain interpretation as well as in the design of in vitro experiments.

Clinical validity assessment of genes frequently tested on intellectual disability/autism sequencing panels.

PURPOSE: Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), exhibit genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, making them difficult to differentiate without a molecular diagnosis. The Clinical Genome Resource Intellectual Disability/Autism Gene Curation Expert Panel (GCEP) uses systematic curation to distinguish ID/ASD genes that are appropriate for clinical testing (ie, with substantial evidence supporting their relationship to disease) from those that are not. METHODS: Using the Clinical Genome Resource gene-disease validity curation framework, the ID/Autism GCEP classified genes frequently included on clinical ID/ASD testing panels as Definitive, Strong, Moderate, Limited, Disputed, Refuted, or No Known Disease Relationship. RESULTS: As of September 2021, 156 gene-disease pairs have been evaluated. Although most (75%) were determined to have definitive roles in NDDs, 22 (14%) genes evaluated had either Limited or Disputed evidence. Such genes are currently not recommended for use in clinical testing owing to the limited ability to assess the effect of identified variants. CONCLUSION: Our understanding of gene-disease relationships evolves over time; new relationships are discovered and previously-held conclusions may be questioned. Without periodic re-examination, inaccurate gene-disease claims may be perpetuated. The ID/Autism GCEP will continue to evaluate these claims to improve diagnosis and clinical care for NDDs.

A Comprehensive Assessment of Co-occurring Birth Defects among Infants with Non-Syndromic Anophthalmia or Microphthalmia.

PURPOSE: Infants with anophthalmia or microphthalmia frequently have co-occurring birth defects. Nonetheless, there have been few investigations of birth defect patterns among these children. Such studies may identify novel multiple malformation syndromes, which could inform future research into the developmental processes that lead to anophthalmia/microphthalmia and assist physicians in determining whether further testing is appropriate. METHODS: This study includes cases with anophthalmia/microphthalmia identified by the Texas Birth Defects Registry from 1999 to 2014 without clinical or chromosomal diagnoses of recognized syndromes. We calculated adjusted observed-to-expected ratios for two - through five-way birth defect combinations involving anophthalmia/microphthalmia to estimate whether these combinations co-occur more often than would be expected if they were independent. We report combinations observed in ≥5 cases. RESULTS: We identified 653 eligible cases with anophthalmia/microphthalmia (514 [79%] with co-occurring birth defects), and 111 birth defect combinations, of which 44 were two-way combinations, 61 were three-way combinations, six were four-way combinations and none were five-way combinations. Combinations with the largest observed-to-expected ratios were those involving central nervous system (CNS) defects, head/neck defects, and orofacial clefts. We also observed multiple combinations involving cardiovascular and musculoskeletal defects. CONCLUSION: Consistent with previous reports, we observed that a large proportion of children diagnosed with anophthalmia/microphthalmia have co-occurring birth defects. While some of these defects may be part of a sequence involving anophthalmia/microphthalmia (e.g., CNS defects), other combinations could point to as yet undescribed susceptibility patterns (e.g., musculoskeletal defects). Data from population-based birth defect registries may be useful for accelerating the discovery of previously uncharacterized malformation syndromes.

Assessment of Cognitive Outcome Measures in Teenagers with 15q13.3 Microdeletion Syndrome.

15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome causes a spectrum of cognitive disorders, including intellectual disability and autism. We aimed to determine if any or all of three cognitive testing systems (the KiTAP, CogState, and Stanford-Binet) are suitable for assessment of cognitive function in affected individuals. These three tests were administered to ten individuals with 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome (14-18 years of age), and the results were analyzed to determine feasibility of use, potential for improvement, and internal consistency. It was determined that the KiTAP, CogState, and Stanford-Binet are valid tests of cognitive function in 15q13.3 microdeletion patients. Therefore, these tests may be considered for use as objective outcome measures in future clinical trials, assessing change in cognitive function over a period of pharmacological treatment.