Assessment of safety, accuracy, and human CD34+ cell retention after intramyocardial injections with a helical needle catheter in a porcine model.

OBJECTIVES: Assess accuracy of Helix injections via fluoroscopic-mapping and evaluate delivery safety. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous intramyocardial-delivery of agents must be safe and accurate; retention is also important. A delivery system (Helical Infusion/Morph Guide-Catheter, Biocardia Inc) has been developed to improve maneuverability and stability of catheter-needle-myocardium intersection. METHODS: Accuracy and safety: 12 swine underwent LV and coronary angiography via 8F sheath. Targeted delivery was assigned into LAD, LCX, or RCA. System was advanced into LV and 6 targeted intramyocardial dye injections (5 mm apart) delivered using fluoroscopy. After euthanization, hearts underwent gross and histologic evaluation. Retention was assessed by iron-oxide and fluorochrome labeled CD34+ cells. Cells were injected into 6 swine using same techniques. Delivery system was advanced into LV, and injections delivered using fluoroscopy. Euthanization was performed at 2 hr and hearts formalin fixed. MRI was performed on 6 treated hearts and 4 untreated controls. Blinded analysis performed by 2 radiologists. Two treated hearts underwent immunohistological analysis. RESULTS: Accuracy and safety evaluation: 71/72 injections (98.6%) were within prespecified zone; 7/72 (9.7%) less than 5 mm apart. No adverse events occurred. MRI-presence of iron-oxide labeled CD34+ cells were correctly identified in 95% (19/20) of imaged injections. Anti-CD34+ antibody staining and fluorescence microscopy confirmed CD34+ cells in myocardium. Histology confirmed cell viability at fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Helix system was accurate and safe. Retention of CD34+ cells was confirmed by MRI and immunohistology. Further preclinical studies are needed to characterize retention over time and quantify efficiency. Studies are needed to confirm accuracy, safety, and retention in humans.

Visual assessment of procedural results following treatment with Sr-90 beta-radiation for instent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Visual assessment (VA) of postprocedural % diameter stenosis (DS) is used routinely in clinical practice to determine the adequacy of coronary intervention. Although VA has been shown to underestimate final %DS after balloon angioplasty compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the impact of this effect on clinical outcomes following treatment with intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) with Sr-90 for instent restenosis (ISR) is unknown. METHODS: To determine the effect of VA on the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after IRT for ISR, we compared the clinical outcomes of 102 consecutive patients based on postprocedural %DS by QCA vs. %DS by VA. MACE was defined as death, M1 or need for target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: MACE rates for the 102 consecutive patients grouped according to postprocedural %DS by QCA and VA were compared. The mean %DS by QCA was 30.7%, while the mean %DS by VA was 12.5%. The mean %DS by VA across the QCA subgroups were 13.67%, 10.71% and 13.37%, respectively (P = .244). Fifty-two patients (51.0%) had %DS > 30% by QCA with the highest MACE percentage occurring in this subgroup. CONCLUSION: VA underestimated the %DS compared to QCA, and it was associated with worse MACE following treatment with Sr-90 for ISR.