Registry-based trials: a potential model for cost savings?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Registry-based trials have emerged as a potentially cost-saving study methodology. Early estimates of cost savings, however, conflated the benefits associated with registry utilisation and those associated with other aspects of pragmatic trial designs, which might not all be as broadly applicable. In this study, we sought to build a practical tool that investigators could use across disciplines to estimate the ranges of potential cost differences associated with implementing registry-based trials versus standard clinical trials. METHODS: We built simulation Markov models to compare unique costs associated with data acquisition, cleaning, and linkage under a registry-based trial design versus a standard clinical trial. We conducted one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, varying study characteristics over broad ranges, to determine thresholds at which investigators might optimally select each trial design. RESULTS: Registry-based trials were more cost effective than standard clinical trials 98.6% of the time. Data-related cost savings ranged from $4300 to $600,000 with variation in study characteristics. Cost differences were most reactive to the number of patients in a study, the number of data elements per patient available in a registry, and the speed with which research coordinators could manually abstract data. Registry incorporation resulted in cost savings when as few as 3768 independent data elements were available and when manual data abstraction took as little as 3.4 seconds per data field. CONCLUSIONS: Registries offer important resources for investigators. When available, their broad incorporation may help the scientific community reduce the costs of clinical investigation. We offer here a practical tool for investigators to assess potential costs savings.

Hospital Costs Related to Early Extubation After Infant Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Heart Network Collaborative Learning Study (PHN CLS) increased early extubation rates after infant tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and coarctation of the aorta (CoA) repair across participating sites by implementing a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The impact of the CPG on hospital costs has not been studied. METHODS: PHN CLS clinical data were linked to cost data from Children's Hospital Association by matching on indirect identifiers. Hospital costs were evaluated across active and control sites in the pre- and post-CPG periods using generalized linear mixed-effects models. A difference-in-difference approach was used to assess whether changes in cost observed in active sites were beyond secular trends in control sites. RESULTS: Data were successfully linked on 410 of 428 eligible patients (96%) from four active and four control sites. Mean adjusted cost per case for TOF repair was significantly reduced in the post-CPG period at active sites ($42,833 vs $56,304, p < 0.01) and unchanged at control sites ($47,007 vs $46,476, p = 0.91), with an overall cost reduction of 27% in active versus control sites (p = 0.03). Specific categories of cost reduced in the TOF cohort included clinical (-66%, p < 0.01), pharmacy (-46%, p = 0.04), lab (-44%, p < 0.01), and imaging (-32%, p < 0.01). There was no change in costs for CoA repair at active or control sites. CONCLUSIONS: The early extubation CPG was associated with a reduction in hospital costs for infants undergoing repair of TOF but not CoA. This CPG represents an opportunity to both optimize clinical outcome and reduce costs for certain infant cardiac surgeries.

Comparison between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients status post atrial switch procedure.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares image quality, cost, right ventricular ejection fraction analysis, and baffle visualization between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in those status post atrial switch for transposition of the great arteries. BACKGROUND: This population requires imaging for serial evaluations. Transthoracic echocardiography is often first line but has drawbacks, many of which are addressed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Twelve patients (mean age 25 years) with relatively concurrent (mean 157 days) studies were included. Three separate echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging physicians independently analyzed baffles, image quality, and right ventricular ejection fractions. Institutional and Medicaid charges were compared. RESULTS: For right ventricular ejection fraction, echocardiography (36.1%) underestimated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (47.8%, P = .002). Image quality for transthoracic echocardiography was significantly rated lower than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (P = .002). Baffles were better seen in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (transthoracic echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: superior vena cava 86% vs. 100% [P = .063]; inferior vena cava 33% vs. 97% [P = .002]; pulmonary vein 92% vs. 100% [P = .250]). Comparing hospital charges and Medicaid reimbursement, transthoracic echocardiography respectively costs 18% and 38% less than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiography underestimated right ventricular ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging had consistently higher image quality and better visualization of the baffles. Cost differences are minimal. We propose that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging be considered first line for imaging in certain patients' status post atrial switch procedure.

Increase of B-type natriuretic peptide from baseline increases the risk of death or retransplant in pediatric cardiac transplant patients, midterm results.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND; Several studies have demonstrated the utility of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in the months following cardiac transplant. The purpose of this study was to analyze longitudinal BNP data in pediatric cardiac transplant patients and determine the efficacy of BNP in routine follow-up of transplant to help predict the adverse event of death or re-transplant. METHODS: From October 2002 to July 2007, 53 pediatric cardiac transplant patients were treated in an unmatched case-control study. Along with routine studies, BNP values were obtained at regular intervals. Six patients were excluded due to recent transplant, and three patients were excluded due to poor compliance. A baseline BNP was established for each subject utilizing the mean of all BNP values during year 2 post-transplant, or the first year of measured BNP in those patients whose transplant preceded the study by more than 1 year (time from transplant to first BNP 7.0 +/- 3.5 years). The median BNP of all data points since transplant was utilized as an additional surrogate baseline. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate BNP versus other covariates on cardiac death. RESULTS: Forty-four patients provided 1254 BNP data points spanning 173 patient years. Nine (20.5%) had an adverse event. Patients who experienced an adverse event had a higher baseline BNP (mean 365 +/- 290; median 375 +/- 352)) when compared to patients without an event (mean 128 +/- 78; median 121 +/- 62; p = 0.04 and p = 0.06)). All subjects with adverse events had a BNP value >or= 250 during the 90 days preceding the event compared to 32.4% of those who did not (odds ratio: 23.13, p < 0.01). A log fold increase in the BNP value compared to the baseline median BNP is a risk for cardiac death in the subsequent 90-day period (OR: 6.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-37.11, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Routine BNP monitoring in the post-cardiac transplant pediatric patient allows for the determination of a median BNP, which can be used as a baseline. A log fold increase from the median BNP, or a BNP value >or= 250, increases the risk of death or re-transplant and suggests a 90-day period of heightened clinical surveillance, perhaps necessitating increased medication or re-listing for repeat transplant.