Quality Assessment of the Preanalytical Workflow in Liquid Biobanking: Taurine as a Serum-Specific Quality Indicator for Preanalytical Process Variations.

The scientific impact of translational biomedical research largely depends on the availability of high-quality biomaterials. However, evidence-based and robust quality indicators (QIs) covering the most relevant preanalytical variations are still lacking. The aim of this study was to identify and validate a QI suitable for assessing time-to-centrifugation (TTC) delays in human liquid biospecimens originating from both healthy and diseased individuals. Serum and plasma samples with varying TTCs were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in a pilot cohort of healthy individuals to identify a suitable QI candidate. Taurine (TAU), as a TTC QI candidate, was validated in healthy individuals and patients with rheumatologic and cardiologic diseases, considering the (1) preanalytical handling temperature, (2) platelet count, and (3) postcentrifugation delay. For discrimination of high TTC (TTC >60 minutes) from low TTC serum specimens, a probability calculation tool was developed (Triple-T-cutoff-model). TTC-dependent changes in healthy individuals were observed for amino acids, particularly TAU. Validation of the TAU levels in an independent cohort of healthy individuals revealed a time-dependent increase in serum, but not in plasma, for a TTC delay of 30-240 minutes. TAU increases were dependent on the handling temperature and platelet count and volume. By contrast, no changes in TAU concentrations were observed for additional postcentrifugation delays. Validation of TAU and the Triple-T-cutoff-model, in rheumatologic/cardiologic patient collectives, allowed the discrimination of samples with TTC ≤60 min/>60 min with estimated AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) values of 89% [78%-100%]/86% [71%-100%] and 91% [79%-100%]/84% [68%-100%], respectively. Considering the preanalytical handling temperature and platelet count and volume, TAU and the Triple-T-cutoff-model represent reliable QIs for TTC >60 minutes in serum samples from healthy individuals and selected rheumatologic/cardiologic patients. However, further studies in larger patient collectives with various diseases are needed to assess the robustness and potential of the QIs presented in this article as biobanking quality assurance/quality control tools to support high-quality biomedical research.

[Current challenges in the assessment of ethical proposals-aspects of digitalization and personalization in the healthcare system]. / Aktuelle Herausforderungen bei der Bewertung von Ethikanträgen ­ Aspekte der Digitalisierung und Personalisierung im Gesundheitswesen.

The global aim of medical ethics committees is to judge the scientific quality and the integrity of the content of medical research projects (studies), thereby assessing the benefit-risk profile. Apart from judging content-related aspects and the legal correctness, the study design and the analysis strategy must also be assessed from a biostatistical point of view. This very sophisticated task is further complicated by the fact that medical research constantly faces new challenges.Within this work, current developments in medical research that directly impact the assessability of ethical proposals will be identified and discussed. The aim is to sensitize researchers to the opportunities and challenges of new developments.The work focusses on the topics of digitalization in the healthcare system and individualized medicine. The authors illustrate some problems resulting from these developments that affect the ethical justification of medical research projects. Problems related to medical as well as biostatistical aspects are presented and their direct implications on the legal justification and ethical and moral conceptual integrity are highlighted.New developments in medical research such as digitalization and individualized medicine offer new perspectives for optimized therapies. These promising developments must be further advanced. A critical view on the so far only poorly investigated consequences of embedding new data sources and study designs must urgently accompany this process. Transparency and clarity in formulating ethical proposals is thereby of utmost importance.

Estimating extra length of stay due to healthcare-associated infections before and after implementation of a hospital-wide infection control program.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a major health concern and have substantial effects on morbidity and mortality and increase healthcare costs. We investigated the effect of a hospital-wide program for the prevention of HAIs on additional length of stay (LOS). METHODS: We analyzed data from a prospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study with two surveillance periods before and after implementation of an infection prevention intervention program. HAI diagnosis was made according to surveillance definition criteria established by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A multistate model was used to estimate additional LOS for patients with HAI in both surveillance periods. RESULTS: During the first and second periods, 1,568 and 2,336 HAIs were identified among 26,943 and 35,211 patients, respectively. For HAI patients exclusively treated in a general ward, additional LOS was 8.4 (95% confidence interval, CI: 6.8-10.0) days in the first period and 9.6 (95% CI: 8.3-11.0) days in the second period (p = 0.26). For HAI patients treated in both an intensive care unit (ICU) and a general ward, additional LOS was 8.1 (95% CI: 6.3-9.9) days in the first period to 7.3 (95% CI: 6.1-8.5) days in the second period (p = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare-associated infections prolong LOS. A hospital-wide infection control program did not alter the prolongation of LOS.

Hospital-related cost of sepsis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This article systematically reviews research on the costs of sepsis and, as a secondary aim, evaluates the quality of economic evaluations reported in peer-reviewed journals. METHODS: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, National Health Service (Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment), Cost-effectiveness Analysis Registry and Web of Knowledge databases for studies published between January 2005 and June 2015. We selected original articles that provided cost and cost-effectiveness analyses, defined sepsis and described their cost calculation method. Only studies that considered index admissions and re-admissions in the first 30 days were published in peer-reviewed journals and used standard treatments were considered. All costs were adjusted to 2014 US dollars. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for various costs of sepsis were calculated. The quality of economic studies was assessed using the Drummond 10-item checklist. RESULTS: Overall, 37 studies met our eligibility criteria. The median of the mean hospital-wide cost of sepsis per patient was $32,421 (IQR $20,745-$40,835), and the median of the mean ICU cost of sepsis per patient was $27,461 (IQR $16,007-$31,251). Overall, the quality of economic studies was low. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of the hospital-related costs of sepsis varied considerably across the included studies depending on the method used for cost calculation, the type of sepsis and the population that was examined. A standard model for conducting cost improve the quality of studies on the costs of sepsis.

Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

IMPORTANCE: The Third International Consensus Definitions Task Force defined sepsis as "life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection." The performance of clinical criteria for this sepsis definition is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of clinical criteria to identify patients with suspected infection who are at risk of sepsis. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND POPULATION: Among 1.3 million electronic health record encounters from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, at 12 hospitals in southwestern Pennsylvania, we identified those with suspected infection in whom to compare criteria. Confirmatory analyses were performed in 4 data sets of 706,399 out-of-hospital and hospital encounters at 165 US and non-US hospitals ranging from January 1, 2008, until December 31, 2013. EXPOSURES: Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) score, and a new model derived using multivariable logistic regression in a split sample, the quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score (range, 0-3 points, with 1 point each for systolic hypotension [≤100 mm Hg], tachypnea [≥22/min], or altered mentation). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For construct validity, pairwise agreement was assessed. For predictive validity, the discrimination for outcomes (primary: in-hospital mortality; secondary: in-hospital mortality or intensive care unit [ICU] length of stay ≥3 days) more common in sepsis than uncomplicated infection was determined. Results were expressed as the fold change in outcome over deciles of baseline risk of death and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: In the primary cohort, 148,907 encounters had suspected infection (n = 74,453 derivation; n = 74,454 validation), of whom 6347 (4%) died. Among ICU encounters in the validation cohort (n = 7932 with suspected infection, of whom 1289 [16%] died), the predictive validity for in-hospital mortality was lower for SIRS (AUROC = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.62-0.66) and qSOFA (AUROC = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.68) vs SOFA (AUROC = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.73-0.76; P < .001 for both) or LODS (AUROC = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.76; P < .001 for both). Among non-ICU encounters in the validation cohort (n = 66 522 with suspected infection, of whom 1886 [3%] died), qSOFA had predictive validity (AUROC = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82) that was greater than SOFA (AUROC = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.78-0.80; P < .001) and SIRS (AUROC = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.77; P < .001). Relative to qSOFA scores lower than 2, encounters with qSOFA scores of 2 or higher had a 3- to 14-fold increase in hospital mortality across baseline risk deciles. Findings were similar in external data sets and for the secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among ICU encounters with suspected infection, the predictive validity for in-hospital mortality of SOFA was not significantly different than the more complex LODS but was statistically greater than SIRS and qSOFA, supporting its use in clinical criteria for sepsis. Among encounters with suspected infection outside of the ICU, the predictive validity for in-hospital mortality of qSOFA was statistically greater than SOFA and SIRS, supporting its use as a prompt to consider possible sepsis.

Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations.

RATIONALE: Reducing the global burden of sepsis, a recognized global health challenge, requires comprehensive data on the incidence and mortality on a global scale. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the worldwide incidence and mortality of sepsis and identify knowledge gaps based on available evidence from observational studies. METHODS: We systematically searched 15 international citation databases for population-level estimates of sepsis incidence rates and fatality in adult populations using consensus criteria and published in the last 36 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The search yielded 1,553 reports from 1979 to 2015, of which 45 met our criteria. A total of 27 studies from seven high-income countries provided data for metaanalysis. For these countries, the population incidence rate was 288 (95% confidence interval [CI], 215-386; τ = 0.55) for hospital-treated sepsis cases and 148 (95% CI, 98-226; τ = 0.99) for hospital-treated severe sepsis cases per 100,000 person-years. Restricted to the last decade, the incidence rate was 437 (95% CI, 334-571; τ = 0.38) for sepsis and 270 (95% CI, 176-412; τ = 0.60) for severe sepsis cases per 100,000 person-years. Hospital mortality was 17% for sepsis and 26% for severe sepsis during this period. There were no population-level sepsis incidence estimates from lower-income countries, which limits the prediction of global cases and deaths. However, a tentative extrapolation from high-income country data suggests global estimates of 31.5 million sepsis and 19.4 million severe sepsis cases, with potentially 5.3 million deaths annually. CONCLUSIONS: Population-level epidemiologic data for sepsis are scarce and nonexistent for low- and middle-income countries. Our analyses underline the urgent need to implement global strategies to measure sepsis morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Extra length of stay and costs because of health care-associated infections at a German university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections (HAIs) can be associated with increased health care costs. We examined extra length of hospital stay (LOS) and associated per diem costs attributable to HAIs in a large academic medical center. METHODS: Data for analysis were acquired in a preinterventional phase of a prospective cohort study (ALERTS) conducted over 12 months in 27 general and 4 intensive care units at Jena University Hospital. HAIs were identified among patients hospitalized for ≥48 hours with at least 1 risk factor for HAI and new antimicrobial therapy; the diagnosis was confirmed by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Extra LOS was estimated by multistate modeling, and associated extra costs were based on average per diem costs for clinical units sampled. RESULTS: Of a total of 22,613 patients hospitalized for ≥48 hours, 893 (3.95%) experienced 1,212 episodes of HAI during 12 months. The associated mean extra LOS ± SEM in general units was 8.45 ± 0.80 days per case and 8.09 ± 0.91 days for patients treated in both general and intensive care units. Additional costs attributable to HAIs were €5,823-€11,840 ($7,453-$15,155) per infected patient. CONCLUSION: HAIs generated substantial extra costs by prolonging hospitalization. Potential clinical and financial savings may be realized by implementing effective infection prevention programs.

Exploring genetic variants predisposing to diabetes mellitus and their association with indicators of socioeconomic status.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of disease-related genetic variants for the explanation of social inequalities in complex diseases is unclear and empirical analyses are largely missing. The aim of our study was to examine whether genetic variants predisposing to diabetes mellitus are associated with socioeconomic status in a population-based cohort. METHODS: We genotyped 11 selected diabetes-related single nucleotide polymorphisms in 4655 participants (age 45-75 years) of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. Diabetes status was self-reported or defined by blood glucose levels. Education, income and paternal occupation were assessed as indicators of socioeconomic status. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine the association of socioeconomic status and diabetes by estimating sex-specific and age-adjusted prevalence ratios and their corresponding 95%-confidence intervals. To explore the relationship between individual single nucleotide polymorphisms and socioeconomic status sex- and age-adjusted odds ratios were computed. We adjusted the alpha-level for multiple testing of 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms using Bonferroni's method (α(BF) ~ 0.005). In addition, we explored the association of a genetic risk score with socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Social inequalities in diabetes were observed for all indicators of socioeconomic status. However, there were no significant associations between individual diabetes-related risk alleles and socioeconomic status with odds ratios ranging from 0.87 to 1.23. Similarly, the genetic risk score analysis revealed no evidence for an association. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide no evidence for an association between 11 diabetes-related risk alleles and different indicators of socioeconomic status in a population-based cohort, suggesting that the explored genetic variants do not contribute to health inequalities in diabetes.

Day-patient treatment after short inpatient care versus continued inpatient treatment in adolescents with anorexia nervosa (ANDI): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: In-patient treatment (IP) is the treatment setting of choice for moderately-to-severely ill adolescents with anorexia nervosa, but it is costly, and the risks of relapse and readmissions are high. Day patient treatment (DP) is less expensive and might avoid problems of relapse and readmission by easing the transition from hospital to home. We investigated the safety and efficacy of DP after short inpatient care compared with continued IP. METHODS: For this multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled female patients (aged 11-18 years) with anorexia nervosa from six centres in Germany. Patients were eligible if they had a body-mass index (BMI) below the tenth percentile and it was their first admission to hospital for anorexia nervosa. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly assign patients to continued IP or DP after 3 weeks of inpatient care (1:1; stratified for age and BMI at admission). The treatment programme and treatment intensity in both study groups were identical. The primary outcome was the increase in BMI between the time of admission and a 12-month follow-up adjusted for age and duration of illness (non-inferiority margin of 0·75 kg/m(2)). Analysis was done by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register, number ISRCTN67783402, and the Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, number DRKS00000101. FINDINGS: Between Feb 2, 2007, to April 27, 2010, we screened 660 patients for eligibility, 172 of whom we randomly allocated to treatment: 85 to IP and 87 to DP. DP was non-inferior to IP with respect to the primary outcome, BMI at the 12-month follow-up (mean difference 0·46 kg/m(2) in favour of DP (95% CI, -0·11 to 1·02; pnon-inferiority<0·0001). The number of treatment-related serious adverse events was similar in both study groups (eight in the IP group, seven in the DP group). Three serious adverse events in the IP group and two in the DP group were related to suicidal ideation; one patient in the DP attempted suicide 3 months after she was discharged. INTERPRETATION: DP after short inpatient care in adolescent patients with non-chronic anorexia nervosa seems no less effective than IP for weight restoration and maintenance during the first year after admission. Thus, DP might be a safe and less costly alternative to IP. Our results justify the broad implementation of this approach. FUNDING: German Ministry for Education and Research.

Medical and psychosocial implications of adolescent extreme obesity - acceptance and effects of structured care, short: Youth with Extreme Obesity Study (YES).

BACKGROUND: Prevalence rates of overweight and obesity have increased in German children and adolescents in the last three decades. Adolescents with extreme obesity represent a distinct risk group. On the basis of data obtained by the German Child and Youth Survey (KiGGS) and the German district military offices we estimate that the group of extremely obese adolescents (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) currently encompasses approximately 200.000 adolescents aged 14 to 21 yrs. Conventional approaches focusing on weight reduction have largely proven futile for them. In addition, only a small percentage of adolescents with extreme obesity seek actively treatment for obesity while contributing disproportionately strong to health care costs. Because of somatic and psychiatric co-morbidities and social problems adolescents with extreme obesity require special attention within the medical care system. We have initiated the project "Medical and psychosocial implications of adolescents with extreme obesity--acceptance and effects of structured care, short: 'Youths with Extreme Obesity Study (YES)'", which aims at improving the medical care and social support structures for youths with extreme obesity in Germany. METHODS/DESIGN: We focus on identification of these subjects (baseline examination) and their acceptance of diagnostic and subsequent treatment procedures. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) we will investigate the effectiveness of a low key group intervention not focusing on weight loss but aimed at the provision of obesity related information, alleviation of social isolation, school and vocational integration and improvement of self-esteem in comparison to a control group treated in a conventional way with focus on weight loss. Interested individuals who fulfill current recommended criteria for weight loss surgery will be provided with a structured preparation and follow-up programs. All subjects will be monitored within a long-term observational study to elucidate medical and psychosocial outcomes. Our aim is to evaluate realistic treatment options. Therefore inclusion and exclusion criteria are minimized. We will recruit adolescents (age range 14-21 years) with extreme obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) (extreme group) within 24 months (120 per centre, 5 centres) as well as obese adolescents being at risk for developing extreme obesity (BMI ≥ 30-34.9 kg/m2) (at risk group). Follow-up evalutations will be performed biannually after inclusion for several years depending on additional funding. In sum, we aim at establishing evaluated health care structures for extremely obese adolescents. DISCUSSION: The results of YES will be of importance for a frequently neglected group of individuals, for whom current medicine has little to offer in terms of structured access to empirically evaluated therapeutic programs. Thus, the results will be both a help for the adolescents within the study and for others in the future given that the trial will lead to a positive finding. Moreover, it will help practitioners and therapists to deal with this neglected group of individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Project registration numbers for each subproject: 1.) ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01625325, NCT01703273, NCT01662271, NCT01632098; 2.) Germanctr.de: DRKS00004172, DRKS00004195, DRKS00004198, DRKS00004197.

Multiscale assessment of treatment efficacy in adults with ADHD: a randomized placebo-controlled, multi-centre study with extended-release methylphenidate.

OBJECTIVES: This trial was performed to test the efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of methylphenidate (MPH ER). METHODS: A total of 162 adults with ADHD according to DSM-IV were treated for 8 weeks with either two daily individually body weight-adjusted doses of MPH ER up to 1 mg/kg per day (N = 84) or placebo (N = 78). The primary efficacy outcome was the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS) 8 weeks after randomization. Secondary efficacy measures were the ADHD Diagnostic Checklist (ADHD-DC), the Conners Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (CAARS-S:L), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). RESULTS: At week 8 a significantly higher decline of the total WRAADDS score was found in the MPH ER group as compared to the placebo group (P = 0.0003). The rates of responders were 50% in the MPH ER and 18% in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, similar effects were observed for the secondary efficacy variable: ADHD-DC score (P = 0.004), CAARS-S:L score (P = 0.008) and the SDS score (P = 0.017). 50% of the MPH ER group and 24.4% of the placebo group were improved "much" or "very much" according to the CGI rating (P = 0.0001). MPH ER treatment was well tolerated. At week 2 also the mean heart rate was significantly higher in the MPH ER group as compared to the placebo group (P = 0.01). No differences between the study groups were observed regarding mean blood pressure at any visit. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial demonstrated statistically significant and clinical relevant effects of MPH ER in adults with ADHD for several self- and investigator-rated ADHD psychopathology and also functional efficacy measures.

Assessment of a chloride-poor versus a chloride-containing version of a modified histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution in a rat liver transplantation model.

Recent in vitro studies of cold-induced cell injury have revealed the detrimental effects of extracellular chloride on cold-stored isolated rat hepatocytes; however, its influence on endothelial cells is beneficial. To determine which of these effects is predominant in vivo, we tested both a chloride-poor variant of a new histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK)-based preservation solution and a chloride-containing variant in a rat liver transplantation model. The study, which was carried out in a blinded fashion with 7 or 8 rats per group, was divided into 2 parts: (1) a comparison of survival in 3 series under different conditions [different microsurgeons, rat strains, cold ischemia times (3, 12, and 24 hours), and warm ischemia times] and (2) an assessment of the microcirculation (30-90 minutes after reperfusion), laboratory data, bile production, and histology. In each of the survival experiments, a (strong) tendency toward prolonged survival was observed with the new chloride-containing solution (50% versus 12.5%, 75% versus 37.5%, and 100% versus 71.4% [chloride-containing vs. chloride-poor], overall P < 0.05). Additionally, the sinusoidal perfusion rates (83.9% ± 4.0% versus 69.2% ± 10.8%, P < 0.01) and the red blood cell velocities in sinusoids (147.7 ± 26.7 versus 115.5 ± 26.0 µm/second, P < 0.05) and in postsinusoidal venules (332.4 ± 87.3 versus 205.5 ± 53.5 µm/second, P < 0.01) were clearly higher with chloride. Moreover, the serum activities of liver enzymes were slightly reduced (not significantly), and bile production was significantly increased. These results suggest an overall beneficial effect of chloride in HTK-based liver preservation solutions.

Data adaptive interim modification of sample sizes for candidate-gene association studies.

OBJECTIVES: The use of conventional Transmission/Disequilibrium tests in the analysis of candidate-gene association studies requires the precise and complete pre-specification of the total number of trios to be sampled to obtain sufficient power at a certain significance level (type I error risk). In most of these studies, very little information about the genetic effect size will be available beforehand and thus it will be difficult to calculate a reasonable sample size. One would therefore wish to reassess the sample size during the course of a study. METHOD: We propose an adaptive group sequential procedure which allows for both early stopping of the study with rejection of the null hypothesis (H0) and for recalculation of the sample size based on interim effect size estimates when H0 cannot be rejected. The applicability of the method which was developed by Müller and Schäfer [Biometrics 2001;57:886-891] in a clinical context is demonstrated by a numerical example. Monte Carlo simulations are performed comparing the adaptive procedure with a fixed sample and a conventional group sequential design. RESULTS: The main advantage of the adaptive procedure is its flexibility to allow for design changes in order to achieve a stabilized power characteristic while controlling the overall type I error and using the information already collected. CONCLUSIONS: Given these advantages, the procedure is a promising alternative to traditional designs.

Confidence intervals for genotype relative risks and allele frequencies from the case parent trio design for candidate-gene studies.

OBJECTIVES: Confidence intervals for genotype relative risks, for allele frequencies and for the attributable risk in the case parent trio design for candidate-gene studies are proposed which can be easily calculated from the observed familial genotype frequencies. METHODS: Likelihood theory and the delta method were used to derive point estimates and confidence internals. We used Monte Carlo simulations to show the validity of the formulae for a variety of given modes of inheritance and allele frequencies and illustrated their usefulness by applying them to real data. RESULTS: Generally these formulae were found to be valid for 'sufficiently large' sample sizes. For smaller sample sizes the estimators for genotype relative risks tended to be conservative whereas the estimator for attributable risk was found to be anti-conservative for moderate to high allele frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: Since the proposed formulae provide quantitative information on the individual and epidemiological relevance of a genetic variant they might be a useful addition to the traditional statistical significance level of TDT results.