Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 78(12): 1112-1117, 2021 06 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617630

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) therapy is used in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia to lower the risk of infections. IVIG and subcutaneous IVIG (SCIG) therapy have been to shown to be safe and effective when administered as clinic-based infusions. Concern from both patients and providers for increased transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus to immunosuppressed patients with scheduled medical visits and procedures made it necessary for us to reassess our process of how we manage patient care in general and chronic clinic infusions in particular. Here we describe our experience of transitioning patients from clinic-based to home based IVIG and/or SCIG infusions to decrease the risk of COVID-19 exposure. METHODS: Criteria were developed to identify high-risk immunosuppressed patients who would be appropriate candidates for potential conversion to home based IVIG infusions. Data were collected via chart review, and cost analysis was performed using Medicare Part B reimbursement data. A patient outcome questionnaire was developed for administration through follow-up phone calls. RESULTS: From March to May 2020, 45 patients met criteria for home-based infusion, with 27 patients (60%) agreeing to home-based infusion. Posttransition patient outcomes assessment, conducted in 26 patients (96%), demonstrated good patient understanding of the home-based infusion process. No infusion-related complications were reported, and 24 patients (92%) had no concerns about receiving future IVIG and/or SCIG doses at home. No patient tested positive for COVID-19 during the study period. Clinic infusion visits decreased by 26.6 visits per month, resulting in a total of 106 hours of additional available infusion chair time per month and associated cost savings of $12,877. CONCLUSION: Transition of clinic based to home based IVIG/SCIG infusion can be successfully done to decrease potential exposure during a pandemic in a high-risk immunosuppressed population, with no impact on patient satisfaction, adherence, or efficacy. The home-based infusion initiative was associated with a reduction in costs to patients and an increase in available chair time in the infusion clinic.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(4): 902-906, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32715917

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Proteinuria monitoring is required for patients receiving bevacizumab. Nonetheless, the frequency of monitoring is not specified in the package insert. A 2014 quality improvement study performed at Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS) found that proteinuria occurred in 15% (all grade) of the 162 patients evaluated. These results led to decreasing the frequency of proteinuria monitoring from every treatment to every other treatment. The objective of this study is to assess the safety of the extended interval for urine protein (UP) monitoring. METHODS: Patients receiving at least four bevacizumab treatments at YNHHS from January to June 2017 were randomly selected and retrospectively reviewed. The following data were collected: baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, medication history, and proteinuria monitoring. The grade, prevalence and management of proteinuria were evaluated. The minimum necessary sample size was determined to be 384 treatments to achieve a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients and 388 bevacizumab treatments were evaluated. Urine protein was assessed in 52.5% of treatments. The incidence of proteinuria among patients was 7.2% (grade 2) and 0% (grade 3). Cumulative dose and the number of total bevacizumab doses did not affect the timing for onset or severity of proteinuria. Two patients with UP ≥ 2+ were further monitored using a 24-h urine collection test with negative results. No treatments were held due to proteinuria. CONCLUSION: Monitoring proteinuria every other treatment does not increase the frequency of adverse events. Urine protein is now monitored prior to every third bevacizumab treatment, reducing unnecessary labs and chair time.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Bevacizumab/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Proteinúria/induzido quimicamente , Proteinúria/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Proteinúria/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA