Assessment of task-based image quality for abdominal CT protocols linked with national diagnostic reference levels.

OBJECTIVES: To assess task-based image quality for two abdominal protocols on various CT scanners. To establish a relationship between diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and task-based image quality. METHODS: A protocol for the detection of focal liver lesions was used to scan an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom containing 8- and 5-mm low-contrast (20 HU) spheres at five CTDIvol levels (4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 mGy) on 12 CTs. Another phantom with high-contrast calcium targets (200 HU) was scanned at 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15 mGy using a renal stones protocol on the same CTs. To assess the detectability, a channelized Hotelling observer was used for low-contrast targets and a non-prewhitening observer with an eye filter was used for high contrast targets. The area under the ROC curve and signal to noise ratio were used as figures of merit. RESULTS: For the detection of 8-mm spheres, the image quality reached a high level (mean AUC over all CTs higher than 0.95) at 11 mGy. For the detection of 5-mm spheres, the AUC never reached a high level of image quality. Variability between CTs was found, especially at low dose levels. For the search of renal stones, the AUC was nearly maximal even for the lowest dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable task-based image quality cannot be reached at the same dose level on all CT scanners. This variability implies the need for scanner-specific dose optimization. KEY POINTS: • There is an image quality variability for subtle low-contrast lesion detection in the clinically used dose range. • Diagnostic reference levels were linked with task-based image quality metrics. • There is a need for specific dose optimization for each CT scanner and clinical protocol.

Clinical evaluation of a novel multibolus contrast agent injection protocol for thoraco-abdominal CT angiography: Assessment of homogeneity of arterial contrast enhancement.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vivo feasibility of a multibolus contrast agent (CA) injection protocol with a reduced CA volume for thoraco-abdominal CT angiography (CTA) and to compare it to a single-bolus CA injection protocol. METHOD: 63 patients who underwent CTA with the multibolus protocol (60 ml CA) were divided in two groups either without (group 1, n = 48) or with (group 2, n = 15) aortic dissection. The aortic contrast enhancement was measured in group 1 using manual ROI analysis (10 segments), as well as semi-automated linear attenuation profiles. A subgroup (n = 18) of group 1, who also underwent imaging with the single-bolus protocol (94 ml CA), was used to compare both protocols. In group 2, differences in attenuation of the true and the false lumen for both the single- and the multibolus protocol were assessed with ROI attenuation measurements in both lumina. Comparisons were made using Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Average attenuation was above 200 HU for 98 % of cases using the multibolus protocol. There was superior contrast homogeneity for the multibolus protocol with a lower standard deviation of attenuation values along the length of the scan (p = 0.003), while average attenuation was higher for the single-bolus protocol (p = 0.002). Prolonged enhancement plateau lead to a more uniform opacification of the true and the false lumen in patients with aortic dissection using the multibolus protocol (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The multibolus protocol in thoraco-abdominal CTA is feasible in patients. It shows consistently high arterial enhancement with superior contrast homogeneity compared to a single-bolus protocol in patients with and without aortic dissection.

Systematic radiation dose optimization of abdominal dual-energy CT on a second-generation dual-source CT scanner: assessment of the accuracy of iodine uptake measurement and image quality in an in vitro and in vivo investigations.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of iodine quantification in a phantom study at different radiation dose levels with dual-energy dual-source CT and to evaluate image quality and radiation doses in patients undergoing a single-energy and two dual-energy abdominal CT protocols. METHODS: In a phantom study, the accuracy of iodine quantification (4.5-23.5 mgI/mL) was evaluated using the manufacturer-recommended and three dose-optimized dual-energy protocols. In a patient study, 75 abdomino-pelvic CT examinations were acquired as follows: 25 CT scans with the manufacturer-recommended dual-energy protocol (protocol A); 25 CT scans with a dose-optimized dual-energy protocol (protocol B); and 25 CT scans with a single-energy CT protocol (protocol C). CTDIvol and objective noise were measured. Five readers scored each scan according to six subjective image quality parameters (noise, contrast, artifacts, visibility of small structures, sharpness, overall diagnostic confidence). RESULTS: In the phantom study, differences between the real and measured iodine concentrations ranged from -8.8% to 17.0% for the manufacturer-recommended protocol and from -1.6% to 20.5% for three dose-optimized protocols. In the patient study, the CTDIvol of protocol A, B, and C were 12.5 ± 1.9, 7.5 ± 1.2, and 6.5 ± 1.7 mGycm, respectively (p < 0.001), and the average image noise values were 6.6 ± 1.2, 7.8 ± 1.4, and 9.6 ± 2.2 HU, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences in the six subjective image quality parameters were observed between the dose-optimized dual-energy and the single-energy protocol. CONCLUSION: A dose reduction of 41% is feasible for the manufacturer-recommended, abdominal dual-energy CT protocol, as it maintained the accuracy of iodine measurements and subjective image quality compared to a single-energy protocol.

Initial Results of a Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Technique Using a Split-Filter: Assessment of Image Quality, Radiation Dose, and Accuracy of Dual-Energy Applications in an In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the image quality, radiation dose, and accuracy of virtual noncontrast images and iodine quantification of split-filter dual-energy computed tomography (CT) using a single x-ray source in a phantom and patient study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phantom study, objective image quality and accuracy of iodine quantification were evaluated for the split-filter dual-energy mode using a tin and gold filter. In a patient study, objective image quality and radiation dose were compared in thoracoabdominal CT of 50 patients between the standard single-energy and split-filter dual-energy mode. The radiation dose was estimated by size-specific dose estimate. To evaluate the accuracy of virtual noncontrast imaging, attenuation measurements in the liver, spleen, and muscle were compared between a true noncontrast premonitoring scan and the virtual noncontrast images of the dual-energy scans. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. RESULTS: In the phantom study, differences between the real and measured iodine concentration ranged from 2.2% to 21.4%. In the patient study, the single-energy and dual-energy protocols resulted in similar image noise (7.4 vs 7.1 HU, respectively; P = 0.43) and parenchymal contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values for the liver (29.2 vs 28.5, respectively; P = 0.88). However, the vascular CNR value for the single-energy protocol was significantly higher than for the dual-energy protocol (10.0 vs 7.1, respectively; P = 0.006). The difference in the measured attenuation between the true and the virtual noncontrast images ranged from 3.1 to 6.7 HU. The size-specific dose estimate of the dual-energy protocol was, on average, 17% lower than that of the single-energy protocol (11.7 vs 9.7 mGy, respectively; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Split-filter dual-energy compared with single-energy CT results in similar objective image noise in addition to dual-energy capabilities at 17% lower radiation dose. Because of beam hardening, split-filter dual-energy can lead to decreased CNR values of iodinated structures.

Assessment of image quality and low-contrast detectability in abdominal CT of obese patients: comparison of a novel integrated circuit with a conventional discrete circuit detector at different tube voltages.

OBJECTIVES: To compare image quality and low-contrast detectability of an integrated circuit (IC) detector in abdominal CT of obese patients with conventional detector technology at low tube voltages. METHODS: A liver phantom with 45 lesions was placed in a water container to mimic an obese patient and examined on two different CT systems at 80, 100 and 120 kVp. The systems were equipped with either the IC or conventional detector. Image noise was measured, and the contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was calculated. Low-contrast detectability was assessed independently by three radiologists. Radiation dose was estimated by the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). RESULTS: The image noise was significantly lower, and the CNR was significantly higher with the IC detector at 80, 100 and 120 kVp, respectively (P = 0.023). The IC detector resulted in an increased lesion detection rate at 80 kVp (38.1 % vs. 17.2 %) and 100 kVp (57.0 % vs. 41.0 %). There was no difference in the detection rate between the IC detector at 100 kVp and the conventional detector at 120 kVp (57.0 % vs. 62.2 %). The CTDIvol at 80, 100 and 120 kVp measured 4.5-5.2, 7.3-7.9 and 9.8-10.2 mGy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The IC detector at 100 kVp resulted in similar low-contrast detectability compared to the conventional detector with a 120-kVp protocol at a radiation dose reduction of 37 %.

Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for abdominal CT protocols in obese patients: assessment of image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability in a phantom.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a noise reduction technique on image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability in abdominal CT for obese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A liver phantom with 12 different tumors was designed, and fat rings were added to mimic intermediately sized and large patients. The intermediate and large phantoms were scanned with our standard abdominal CT protocol (image noise level of 15 HU and filtered back projection [FBP]). The large phantom was scanned with five different noise levels (10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, and 20 HU). All datasets for the large phantom were reconstructed with FBP and the noise reduction technique. The image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed. Tumor detection was independently performed by three radiologists in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: The application of the noise reduction method to the large phantom decreased the measured image noise (range, -14.5% to -37.0%) and increased the CNR (range, 26.7-70.6%) compared with FBP at the same noise level (p < 0.001). However, noise reduction was unable to improve the sensitivity for tumor detection in the large phantom compared with FBP at the same noise level (p > 0.05). Applying a noise level of 15 HU, the overall sensitivity for tumor detection in the intermediate and large phantoms with FBP measured 75.5% and 87.7% and the radiation doses measured 42.0 and 23.7 mGy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although noise reduction significantly improved the quantitative image quality in simulated large patients undergoing abdominal CT compared with FBP, no improvement was observed for low-contrast detectability.

Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose of an iterative reconstruction algorithm compared with a filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm for abdominal computed tomography (CT) at different tube voltages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A custom liver phantom with 45 simulated hypovascular liver tumors (diameters of 5, 10, and 15 mm; tumor-to-liver contrast of 10, 25, and 50 HU) was placed in a cylindrical water container that mimicked an intermediate-sized patient. The phantom was scanned at 120, 100, and 80 kVp. The CT data sets were reconstructed with FBP and iterative reconstruction. The image noise was measured, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the tumors was calculated. The radiation dose was assessed with the volume CT dose index. Tumor detection was independently performed by three radiologists. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance. RESULTS: Compared with the FBP data set at 120 kVp, the iterative reconstruction data set collected at 100 kVp demonstrated significantly lower mean image noise (20.9 and 16.7 HU, respectively; P < .001) and greater mean CNRs for the simulated tumors (P < .001). The iterative reconstruction data set collected at 120 kVp yielded the highest sensitivity for tumor detection, while the FBP data set at 80 kVp yielded the lowest. The sensitivity for the iterative reconstruction data set at 100 kVp was comparable with that for the FBP data set at 120 kVp (79.3% and 74.9%, respectively; P > .99). The volume CT dose index decreased by 39.8% between the 120-kVp protocol and the 100-kVp protocol and by 70.3% between the 120-kVp protocol and the 80-kVp protocol. CONCLUSION: Results of this phantom study suggest that a 100-kVp abdominal CT protocol with an iterative reconstruction algorithm for simulated intermediate-sized patients increases the image quality and maintains the diagnostic accuracy at a reduced radiation dose when compared with a 120-kVp protocol with an FBP algorithm.

Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.

OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality and radiation dose of thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) angiography at 80 and 100 kVp and to assess the feasibility of reducing contrast medium volume from 60 to 45 mL at 80 kVp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was waived. Seventy-five patients who had undergone thoracoabdominal 64-section multidetector-row CT angiography were divided into 3 groups of 25 patients each. Patients of groups A (tube voltage, 100 kVp) and B (tube voltage, 80 kVp) received 60 mL of contrast medium at 4 mL/s. Patients of group C (tube voltage, 80 kVp) received 45 mL of contrast medium at 3 mL/s. Mean aortoiliac attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed. The measurement of radiation dose was based on the volume CT dose index. Three independent readers assessed the diagnostic image quality. RESULTS: Mean aortoiliac attenuation for group B (621.1 +/- 90.5 HU) was significantly greater than for groups A and C (485.2 +/- 110.5 HU and 483.1 +/- 119.8 HU; respectively) (P < 0.001). Mean image noise was significantly higher for groups B and C than for group A (P < 0.05). The contrast-to-noise ratio did not significantly differ between the groups (group A, 35.0 +/- 13.8; group B, 31.7 +/- 10.1; group C, 27.3 +/- 11.5; P = 0.08). Mean volume CT dose index in groups B and C (5.2 +/- 0.4 mGy and 4.9 +/- 0.3 mGy, respectively) were reduced by 23.5% and 27.9%, respectively, compared with group A (6.8 +/- 0.8 mGy) (P < 0.001). The average overall diagnostic image quality for the 3 groups was graded as good or better. The score for group A was significantly higher than that for group C (P < 0.01), no difference was seen between group A and B (P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of tube voltage from 100 to 80 kVp for thoracoabdominal CT angiography significantly reduces radiation dose without compromising image quality. Reduction of contrast medium volume to 45 mL at 80 kVp resulted in lower but still diagnostically acceptable image quality.

Assessment of the optimal temporal window for intravenous CT cholangiography.

The optimal temporal window of intravenous (IV) computed tomography (CT) cholangiography was prospectively determined. Fifteen volunteers (eight women, seven men; mean age, 38 years) underwent dynamic CT cholangiography. Two unenhanced images were acquired at the porta hepatis. Starting 5 min after initiation of IV contrast infusion (20 ml iodipamide meglumine 52%), 15 pairs of images at 5-min intervals were obtained. Attenuation of the extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) and the liver parenchyma was measured. Two readers graded visualization of the higher-order biliary branches. The first biliary opacification in the EBD occurred between 15 and 25 min (mean, 22.3 min +/- 3.2) after initiation of the contrast agent. Biliary attenuation plateaued between the 35- and the 75-min time points. Maximum hepatic parenchymal enhancement was 18.5 HU +/- 2.7. Twelve subjects demonstrated poor or non-visualization of higher-order biliary branches; three showed good or excellent visualization. Body weight and both biliary attenuation and visualization of the higher-order biliary branches correlated significantly (P<0.05). For peak enhancement of the biliary tree, CT cholangiography should be performed no earlier than 35 min after initiation of IV infusion. For a fixed contrast dose, superior visualization of the biliary system is achieved in subjects with lower body weight.

Intrahepatic tumor recurrence after partial hepatectomy: value of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.

PURPOSE: To determine the risks and benefits of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of recurrent hepatic tumors in patients who have undergone hepatic resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of the institutional RF ablation database yielded 35 patients with recurrent hepatic tumor after hepatectomy. Sixty-one recurrent hepatic tumors (mean diameter +/- SD, 1.7 +/- 1.1 cm; range, 0.5-5.3 cm) were ablated percutaneously under sonographic guidance or combined guidance with sonographic and fluoroscopic computed tomography (CT). Follow-up CT, magnetic resonance imaging, or both were used for assessment of the primary and secondary therapeutic effectiveness rate and failure of RF ablation. Patients' survival status was determined by contacting the primary care physician or searching the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: Complete ablation was accomplished in 54 of 61 hepatic tumors (primary therapeutic effectiveness rate, 88.5%). During a mean follow-up time of 18 months (range, 1-65 months), 14.8% of the tumors (n = 9) were incompletely ablated. Three of the nine incompletely ablated tumors were treated with a second RF ablation, all three of which failed (secondary therapeutic effectiveness rate, 0%). Distant intrahepatic tumor progression appeared in 23 of 35 patients (65.7%). One major complication (2.1%, one of 48 sessions) and eight minor complications (16.7%, eight of 48 sessions) were reported. The major complication was hepatic abscess formation. The overall survival rates for all patients at 1, 2, and 3 years were 76%, 68%, and 45%, respectively. For patients with metastases from colorectal cancer (n = 14), the overall survival rates were 72%, 60%, and 60% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively; and for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 8), the overall survival rates were 72%, 58%, and 44% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous RF ablation offers a safe and effective treatment option for recurrent hepatic tumors after previous partial hepatectomy.