RESUMO
This manuscript describes the functional status trajectory of older (age 65 or older) and younger (age 18-64) adults after lung transplantation (LT). After the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) in 2005, older adults became the fastest growing subgroup of recipients. Yet the impact of LT on physical function, a main determinant of quality of life in older adults, is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using United Network for Organ Sharing data on 4805 adults who received a LT during 2005-2009. We divided them into older (≥65; n = 774) and younger (18-64; n = 4031) cohorts. Functional status was measured by Karnofsky performance score (KPS). Mixed models estimated the impact of age group on the rate of functional decline starting at 1 year posttransplantation. We controlled for KPS at transplantation, gender, race, diagnosis, LAS and LT type. Age group was not associated with different rates of decline in KPS over time. On average, recipients who were older, received a single LT, or had a low KPS at transplantation had worse functional status posttransplantation when compared to their counterparts, but rarely reached disability at 48 months. Overall, LT had a positive and durable effect on physical function for both older and younger recipients.
Assuntos
Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Transplante de Pulmão , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
An increasing number of patients older than 65 years are referred for and have access to organ transplantation, and an increasing number of older adults are donating organs. Although short-term outcomes are similar in older versus younger transplant recipients, older donor or recipient age is associated with inferior long-term outcomes. However, age is often a proxy for other factors that might predict poor outcomes more strongly and better identify patients at risk for adverse events. Approaches to transplantation in older adults vary across programs, but despite recent gains in access and the increased use of marginal organs, older patients remain less likely than other groups to receive a transplant, and those who do are highly selected. Moreover, few studies have addressed geriatric issues in transplant patient selection or management, or the implications on health span and disability when patients age to late life with a transplanted organ. This paper summarizes a recent trans-disciplinary workshop held by ASP, in collaboration with NHLBI, NIA, NIAID, NIDDK and AGS, to address issues related to kidney, liver, lung, or heart transplantation in older adults and to propose a research agenda in these areas.
Assuntos
Transplante de Órgãos , Idoso , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Seleção de Pacientes , Justiça Social , Doadores de Tecidos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Shingles Prevention Study (SPS; Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study 403) demonstrated that zoster vaccine was efficacious through 4 years after vaccination. The Short-Term Persistence Substudy (STPS) was initiated after the SPS to further assess the persistence of vaccine efficacy. METHODS: The STPS re-enrolled 7320 vaccine and 6950 placebo recipients from the 38 546-subject SPS population. Methods of surveillance, case determination, and follow-up were analogous to those in the SPS. Vaccine efficacy for herpes zoster (HZ) burden of illness, incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and incidence of HZ were assessed for the STPS population, for the combined SPS and STPS populations, and for each year through year 7 after vaccination. RESULTS: In the STPS as compared to the SPS, vaccine efficacy for HZ burden of illness decreased from 61.1% to 50.1%, vaccine efficacy for the incidence of PHN decreased from 66.5% to 60.1%, and vaccine efficacy for the incidence of HZ decreased from 51.3% to 39.6%, although the differences were not statistically significant. Analysis of vaccine efficacy in each year after vaccination for all 3 outcomes showed a decrease in vaccine efficacy after year 1, with a further decline thereafter. Vaccine efficacy was statistically significant for the incidence of HZ and the HZ burden of illness through year 5. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine efficacy for each study outcome was lower in the STPS than in the SPS. There is evidence of the persistence of vaccine efficacy through year 5 after vaccination but, vaccine efficacy is uncertain beyond that point.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/administração & dosagem , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The incidence and severity of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia increase with age in association with a progressive decline in cell-mediated immunity to varicella-zoster virus (VZV). We tested the hypothesis that vaccination against VZV would decrease the incidence, severity, or both of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among older adults. METHODS: We enrolled 38,546 adults 60 years of age or older in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of an investigational live attenuated Oka/Merck VZV vaccine ("zoster vaccine"). Herpes zoster was diagnosed according to clinical and laboratory criteria. The pain and discomfort associated with herpes zoster were measured repeatedly for six months. The primary end point was the burden of illness due to herpes zoster, a measure affected by the incidence, severity, and duration of the associated pain and discomfort. The secondary end point was the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia. RESULTS: More than 95 percent of the subjects continued in the study to its completion, with a median of 3.12 years of surveillance for herpes zoster. A total of 957 confirmed cases of herpes zoster (315 among vaccine recipients and 642 among placebo recipients) and 107 cases of postherpetic neuralgia (27 among vaccine recipients and 80 among placebo recipients) were included in the efficacy analysis. The use of the zoster vaccine reduced the burden of illness due to herpes zoster by 61.1 percent (P<0.001), reduced the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia by 66.5 percent (P<0.001), and reduced the incidence of herpes zoster by 51.3 percent (P<0.001). Reactions at the injection site were more frequent among vaccine recipients but were generally mild. CONCLUSIONS: The zoster vaccine markedly reduced morbidity from herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among older adults.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Neuralgia/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Herpes Zoster/complicações , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Humanos , Memória Imunológica , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia/virologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Ativação ViralRESUMO
We estimated the cost and cost-effectiveness of a clinical pharmacist intervention known to improve the appropriateness of drug prescribing. Elderly veteran outpatients prescribed at least five drugs were randomized to an intervention (105 patients) or control (103) group and followed for 1 year. The intervention pharmacist provided advice to patients and their physicians during all general medicine visits. Mean fixed and variable costs/intervention patient were $36 and $84, respectively Health services use and costs were comparable between groups. Intervention costs ranged from $7.50-30/patient/unit change in drug appropriateness. The cost to improve the appropriateness of drug prescribing is thus relatively low.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/economia , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Farmacêuticos , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Aconselhamento/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Tratamento Farmacológico/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of drug utilization evaluation (DUE) applied to medications commonly used by the ambulatory elderly. METHODS: A DUE model was developed for four domains: (1) justification for use, (2) critical process indicators, (3) complications, and (4) clinical outcomes. DUE criteria specific to use in the elderly were developed for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and histamine2 (H2)-antagonists, and consensus was reached by an external expert panel. After pilot testing, two clinical pharmacists independently evaluated these medications, applying the DUE criteria and rating each item as appropriate or inappropriate. Interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed by using kappa statistics. RESULTS: In a sample of 208 ambulatory elderly veterans, 42 (20.2%) were taking an ACE inhibitor and 56 (26.9%) an H2-antagonist. The interrater agreement for individual domains, represented by kappa statistics, were 0.10-0.58 and 0-0.83 for ACE inhibitors and H2-antagonists, respectively. The kappa statistic for overall agreement, which considered ratings from all criteria across all domains, was 0.24 for ACE inhibitors and 0.18 for H2-antagonists. Intrarater reliability was assessed 3 months later, and kappa statistics were 0.61-0.65 (0.49 overall) and 0-0.96 (0.81 overall) for ACE inhibitors and H2-antagonists, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intrarater reliability for DUE was good to excellent. However, interrater reliability exhibited only marginal reproducibility, particularly where evaluators were required to use subjective judgement (i.e., complications, clinical outcomes). DUE may not be a suitable standard for assessing medication appropriateness in ambulatory elderly patients.
Assuntos
Idoso , Tratamento Farmacológico/normas , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Feminino , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Farmacêuticos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento , VeteranosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of a medication appropriateness index (MAI) modified for elderly outpatients in a non-Veterans Affairs setting. DESIGN: Reliability study. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Ten community-dwelling elderly (> 65 y) taking five or more regularly scheduled medications and participating in a university-based health service intervention study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interrater reliability of MAI ratings of 65 medications made by two clinical pharmacists for individual items and for an overall summed score was calculated by use of kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The interrater agreement for each of the individual MAI items was high for both appropriate and inappropriate ratings and ranged from 80% to 100% (overall kappa = 0.64). Overall agreement for the summed score was good (intraclass correlation = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The modified MAI is a reliable instrument for evaluation of medication appropriateness in a non-Veterans Affairs, ambulatory, elderly population and may provide pharmacists with a practical and standard method to evaluate patients' drug regimens and identify some potential drug-related problems.
Assuntos
Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Tratamento Farmacológico/normas , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Interações Medicamentosas , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Tratamento Farmacológico/economia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Pain typically accompanies acute herpes zoster and, in a proportion of patients, it persists well beyond rash healing. Pain must therefore be analyzed in trials of antiviral agents in herpes zoster, but different methods have been used to analyze pain in recent published trials. These reports are reviewed and their methodological strengths and weaknesses examined. Based on this review, recommendations for the design and analysis of future trials of antiviral agents in herpes zoster are proposed. The principal recommendation is that antiviral efficacy should be evaluated both by distinguishing post-herpetic neuralgia from acute pain and by considering pain as a continuum. The primary endpoint should address both the prevalence and duration of post-herpetic neuralgia and should be examined in those patients who have post-herpetic neuralgia. Adopting the proposed recommendations in design and analysis of future trials should facilitate comparison across trials of the efficacy of antiviral agents in the treatment of herpes zoster.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Herpes Zoster/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Previsões , Humanos , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
Inappropriate medication prescribing is an important problem in the elderly, but is difficult to measure. As part of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist intervention among elderly veterans using many medications, we developed the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), which uses implicit criteria to measure elements of appropriate prescribing. This paper describes the development and validation of a weighting scheme used to produce a single summated MAI score per medication. Using this weighting scheme, two clinical pharmacists rated 105 medications prescribed to 10 elderly veterans from a general medicine clinic. The summated score demonstrated acceptable reliability (intraclass correlation co-efficient = 0.74). In addition, the summated MAI adequately reflected the putative heterogeneity in prescribing appropriateness among 1644 medications prescribed to 208 elderly veterans in the same general medicine clinic. These data support the content validity of the summated MAI. The MAI appears to be a relatively reliable, valid measure of prescribing appropriateness and may be useful for research studies, quality improvement programs, and patient care.